Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Austria
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Immigrants from Austria

Good
Excellent
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,557
SOCIAL INDEX
83.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
65th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Austria Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,767,052 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Austria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Immigrants from Austria.
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Austria Communities

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $106,103, a difference of 12.9%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $95,277, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $52,400, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $68,208, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $52,503, a difference of 3.4%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Austria
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Exceptional
$52,503
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Exceptional
$116,830
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Exceptional
$95,277
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Exceptional
$51,826
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Exceptional
$62,164
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Exceptional
$42,824
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Good
$52,400
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Exceptional
$106,103
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Exceptional
$113,140
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Exceptional
$68,208
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Tragic
28.1%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 17.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.82%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Austria
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Austria
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 21.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Austria
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Good
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Good
82.9%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.0%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Austria
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
25.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Austria
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.8%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.97%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Austria
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Exceptional
70.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
64.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Exceptional
52.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
44.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Austria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.8%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Austria Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Austria
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.4%