Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,221,918 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $90,137, a difference of 32.9%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $42,164, a difference of 28.7%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $52,810, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $52,594, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $60,043, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $40,429, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 45.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.0%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 38.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.8%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 58.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.4%).