Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Ghanaians

Good
Fair
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,221,918 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Ghanaians.
Immigrants from China Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $90,137, a difference of 32.9%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $42,164, a difference of 28.7%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $52,810, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $52,594, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $60,043, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $40,429, a difference of 16.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 45.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaGhanaian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.0%

Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaGhanaian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.0%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 38.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.8%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaGhanaian
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
34.3%

Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 58.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from China vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaGhanaian
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%