Costa Rican vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,974,547 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.762. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 29.5 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $116,156, a difference of 13.0%), and median household income ($87,262 compared to $98,496, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($44,090 compared to $46,098, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $41,461, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 41.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.0%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.5%), college, 1 year or more (58.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and college, under 1 year (64.4% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.2%).