Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Immigrants from Belarus

Good
Good
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,099,619 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Belarus.
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($105,335 compared to $94,399, a difference of 11.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $107,393, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $62,162, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,743, a difference of 3.9%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $44,757, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Belarus
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Exceptional
$50,303
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Exceptional
$114,586
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Exceptional
$94,399
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Exceptional
$53,043
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Exceptional
$62,658
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Exceptional
$44,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Exceptional
$55,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Exceptional
$107,393
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Exceptional
$111,430
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Good
$62,162
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Average
25.7%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Belarus
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Good
11.5%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Belarus
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.3%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Belarus
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
33.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Tragic
73.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.60%), single father households (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Belarus
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
25.6%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Belarus
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
16.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Tragic
83.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
47.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
15.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
4.7%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.2%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.8%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.3%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Belarus
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
87.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Exceptional
69.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaImmigrants from Belarus
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%