Kiowa vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Kiowa
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Kiowa
Chinese
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Kiowa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,331,600 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Chinese.
Kiowa vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $116,156, a difference of 55.3%), householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $77,465, a difference of 51.5%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $98,496, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.7%), median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $41,461, a difference of 21.7%), and median earnings ($39,232 compared to $48,836, a difference of 24.5%).
Income Metric | Kiowa | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,102 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $80,885 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $65,914 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,232 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,094 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,074 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,733 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,776 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,815 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,140 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.6% | Average 25.9% |
Kiowa vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 91.9%), family poverty (12.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 88.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.0%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 44.1%), and single father poverty (22.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 45.9%).
Poverty Metric | Kiowa | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 23.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Kiowa vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 55.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Kiowa | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Kiowa vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Kiowa | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.2% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Kiowa vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 42.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.4%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (61.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 11.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Kiowa | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 43.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Kiowa vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.1%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 40.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Kiowa | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Kiowa vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.7%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Kiowa | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.8% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.0% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Kiowa vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 68.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.3%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.5%).
Disability Metric | Kiowa | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |