Burmese vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Burmese
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Burmese
Chinese
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Burmese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,970,838 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Chinese.
Burmese vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $56,872, a difference of 14.7%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $46,098, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $48,836, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $116,156, a difference of 4.5%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $98,496, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Burmese | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,005 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $123,369 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $103,145 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,559 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $65,236 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,911 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,800 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $113,701 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $121,444 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,139 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Average 25.9% |
Burmese vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.41%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Poverty Metric | Burmese | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Burmese vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.51%).
Unemployment Metric | Burmese | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Burmese | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Burmese vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.7%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Burmese | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.4% | Excellent 30.2% |
Burmese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.7%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Burmese | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Burmese vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.3%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Burmese | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.3% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.9% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Burmese vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.4%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Disability Metric | Burmese | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |