French Canadian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,054,535 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $77,465, a difference of 33.6%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $98,496, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $116,156, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $56,872, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($46,026 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $46,098, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 16.5%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 89.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.0%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (48.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.2%), associate's degree (44.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.6%).