Ukrainian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,000,950 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Ukrainian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ukrainians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ukrainians corresponds to an increase of 48.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,032 compared to $77,465, a difference of 22.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,843 compared to $58,162, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($91,456 compared to $98,496, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,015 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,451 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($50,320 compared to $48,836, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.8%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.7%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.4%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.2%), no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%).