Immigrants from China vs Slovene Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,107,391 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Slovenes within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Slovenes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Slovenes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $96,439, a difference of 24.2%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $85,562, a difference of 23.1%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $45,581, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,886, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $60,241, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.6%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 40.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 26.3%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.55%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 88.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 88.2%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.8%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slovene communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.8%).