Romanian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Chinese
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,092,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.872. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 57.8 Chinese.
Romanian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $77,465, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $58,162, a difference of 8.5%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($50,244 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.9%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Average 25.9% |
Romanian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.1%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Romanian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Romanian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Romanian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Chinese |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Romanian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.8%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Romanian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.22%), college, 1 year or more (62.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Romanian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Chinese |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |