Afghan vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Afghan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Afghans

Chinese

Good
Exceptional
7,658
SOCIAL INDEX
74.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
108th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Afghan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,342,546 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Afghan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Afghans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Afghans corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Chinese.
Afghan Integration in Chinese Communities

Afghan vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Afghan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,951 compared to $77,465, a difference of 12.3%), median male earnings ($59,554 compared to $56,872, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($51,112 compared to $48,836, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,410 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.14%), householder income under 25 years ($58,019 compared to $58,162, a difference of 0.25%), and per capita income ($46,268 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.37%).
Afghan vs Chinese Income
Income MetricAfghanChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,268
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,971
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,026
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,112
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,554
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,077
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,019
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,410
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,676
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,951
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Average
25.9%

Afghan vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Afghan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 51.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.7%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.6%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father poverty (14.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.4%).
Afghan vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricAfghanChinese
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Good
13.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.8%

Afghan vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Afghan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Afghan vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAfghanChinese
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Afghan vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Afghan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.48%).
Afghan vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAfghanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.1%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
84.1%

Afghan vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Afghan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and family households with children (30.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.80%), family households (66.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Afghan vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAfghanChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.2%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.0%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
30.2%

Afghan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Afghan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Afghan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAfghanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.8%

Afghan vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Afghan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.5%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.31%), associate's degree (48.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and college, under 1 year (67.8% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.74%).
Afghan vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricAfghanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Poor
92.1%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.8%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Fair
1.8%

Afghan vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Afghan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.6%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Afghan vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricAfghanChinese
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Fair
17.3%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%