Immigrants from China vs Panamanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,455,192 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Panamanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Panamanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $90,193, a difference of 32.8%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $42,035, a difference of 29.1%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $97,683, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,611, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $58,266, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.7%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 38.6%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.20%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 86.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 62.5%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.2%).