Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nigerian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Nigerians

Good
Poor
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nigerian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,298,202 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.725. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 11.8 Nigerians.
Immigrants from China Integration in Nigerian Communities

Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $87,730, a difference of 36.5%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $41,026, a difference of 32.3%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $52,039, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $49,416, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $58,992, a difference of 17.3%).
Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaNigerian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Tragic
$41,026
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Tragic
$97,522
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Poor
$81,725
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Tragic
$52,039
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Average
$39,641
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Tragic
$49,416
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$87,730
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Tragic
$95,492
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Poor
$58,992
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
23.0%

Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 40.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaNigerian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaNigerian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%

Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaNigerian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Average
82.7%

Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaNigerian
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
35.3%

Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.39%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaNigerian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 70.5%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 59.2%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaNigerian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Average
14.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.8%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.65%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from China vs Nigerian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaNigerian
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
2.4%