Immigrants from Mexico vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,659,157 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $77,465, a difference of 46.7%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $116,188, a difference of 38.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $116,156, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $58,162, a difference of 15.3%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $41,461, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 107.8%), family poverty (12.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 88.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 81.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 58.8%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.1%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.52 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.070%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 147.4%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 68.7%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.9%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.2%).