Israeli vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Israeli
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Israelis
Chinese
6,737
SOCIAL INDEX
64.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
145th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Israeli Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,641,299 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.907. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to an increase of 36.8 Chinese.
Israeli vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $77,465, a difference of 16.3%), per capita income ($52,596 compared to $46,098, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($63,228 compared to $56,872, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,186 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($96,552 compared to $98,496, a difference of 2.0%), and median family income ($118,577 compared to $116,188, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Israeli | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,596 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,577 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,552 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,937 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,228 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,852 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,335 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,579 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,186 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,636 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Average 25.9% |
Israeli vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 45.1%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.3%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.8%).
Poverty Metric | Israeli | Chinese |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Fair 11.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Average 12.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Israeli vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Israeli | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Israeli vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.85%).
Labor Participation Metric | Israeli | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.4% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Israeli vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%), family households (63.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Israeli | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
Israeli vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 69.2%), no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 42.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Israeli | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Israeli vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.4%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.1%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Israeli | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.3% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.9% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Israeli vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.6%), male disability (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Israeli | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.4% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |