Immigrants from China vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,764,391 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $76,362, a difference of 60.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $66,974, a difference of 57.3%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $81,385, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 14.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $54,096, a difference of 27.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $45,275, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 108.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 95.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 91.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 133.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 113.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 92.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 67.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 59.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.33%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.47, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 37.2%), no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 94.6%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 89.5%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 88.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.40%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 68.7%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.2%).