Alaskan Athabascan vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,454,356 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 109.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $98,496, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $77,465, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.53%), median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $41,461, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 74.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.4%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 113.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 109.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 71.2%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households (61.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 89.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 33.4%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.5%).