Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iraqi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Iraqis

Good
Average
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iraqi Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,376,149 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iraqis within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Iraqis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Iraqis.
Immigrants from China Integration in Iraqi Communities

Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $90,764, a difference of 31.9%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $42,760, a difference of 26.9%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $83,753, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,802, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $60,466, a difference of 14.4%).
Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaIraqi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Fair
$42,760
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Fair
$100,658
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Fair
$83,753
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Fair
$46,140
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Average
$54,182
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Poor
$38,666
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Tragic
$50,802
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Poor
$90,764
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Fair
$99,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Fair
$60,466
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Poor
26.6%

Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.020%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaIraqi
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Poor
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Poor
17.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Fair
12.2%

Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaIraqi
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.5%

Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.83%).
Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaIraqi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
82.2%

Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.3%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.27%), family households (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaIraqi
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Average
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
27.6%

Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 95.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaIraqi
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
57.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Average
19.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.2%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.21%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaIraqi
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
39.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Iraqi Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaIraqi
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
48.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%