Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,573,440 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 81.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $77,465, a difference of 48.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,138 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($80,357 compared to $98,496, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($53,503 compared to $56,872, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,812 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 67.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 81.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 50.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.8%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 106.4%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.8%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 95.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.2%).