Iraqi vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,233,285 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Iraqi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iraqis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iraqis corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,466 compared to $77,465, a difference of 28.1%), median household income ($83,753 compared to $98,496, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,387 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.8%), median male earnings ($54,182 compared to $56,872, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($46,140 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 60.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 67.7%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.1%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.9%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (48.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.64%).