Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Jordan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Jordan
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,031
SOCIAL INDEX
87.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
33rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Jordan Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,974,500 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Immigrants from Jordan.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $97,185, a difference of 23.2%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $45,066, a difference of 20.4%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $57,145, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $63,041, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,370, a difference of 12.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Excellent $45,066 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $107,715 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $89,412 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $48,673 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $57,145 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $40,977 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Poor $51,370 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Excellent $97,185 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $106,164 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Excellent $63,041 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Fair 26.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.8%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Good 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Excellent 15.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 27.1% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.25%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.85%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Average 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Excellent 83.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.52%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 75.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Good 19.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 41.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Excellent 89.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 86.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 67.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 61.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 40.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Jordan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.4%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.25%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Jordan |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |