Yup'ik vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Chinese

Fair
Exceptional
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,834,055 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.549% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to a decrease of 548.6 Chinese.
Yup'ik Integration in Chinese Communities

Yup'ik vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $46,098, a difference of 51.0%), median family income ($79,290 compared to $116,188, a difference of 46.5%), and median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $56,872, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($32,730 compared to $41,461, a difference of 26.7%).
Yup'ik vs Chinese Income
Income MetricYup'ikChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Average
25.9%

Yup'ik vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 267.2%), receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 234.5%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 188.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 31.8%), single female poverty (26.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 64.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (27.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 67.2%).
Yup'ik vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikChinese
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
9.8%

Yup'ik vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 261.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 236.0%), and male unemployment (16.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 234.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 101.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 112.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 115.8%).
Yup'ik vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Yup'ik vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.0%).
Yup'ik vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

Yup'ik vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 173.0%), single mother households (10.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 93.8%), and births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (72.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.3%), divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 14.2%).
Yup'ik vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Excellent
30.2%

Yup'ik vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 458.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 72.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 56.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 57.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 60.9%).
Yup'ik vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
8.8%

Yup'ik vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 98.1%), associate's degree (25.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 94.4%), and master's degree (8.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and 8th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Yup'ik vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Fair
1.8%

Yup'ik vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 296.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (37.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 74.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.5%).
Yup'ik vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%