Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guamanians/Chamorros

Chinese

Fair
Exceptional
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,100,398 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.315% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 314.6 Chinese.
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Chinese Communities

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $77,465, a difference of 22.6%), median family income ($101,061 compared to $116,188, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $116,156, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.27%), median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $56,872, a difference of 6.0%), and median earnings ($45,933 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Income
Income MetricGuamanian/ChamorroChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,678
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,061
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Good
$86,255
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,933
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,661
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,717
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,423
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,569
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,170
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,187
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Average
25.9%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 35.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 17.7%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricGuamanian/ChamorroChinese
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
9.8%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.9%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.8%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuamanian/ChamorroChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.98%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuamanian/ChamorroChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.5%), family households (66.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuamanian/ChamorroChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Excellent
30.2%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.8%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.2%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.8%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricGuamanian/ChamorroChinese
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), male disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%