Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,025,210 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $106,888, a difference of 12.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $95,319, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $111,914, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $66,376, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $51,770, a difference of 4.8%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.83%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 28.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.7%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.2%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |