Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Personal Care and Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Ball Club 39.4% 2.5% (+36.9)#1 2.6% (+36.8)#63
2. Williams 18.5% 2.5% (+16.0)#2 2.6% (+15.9)#285
3. Minneiska 18.2% 2.5% (+15.7)#3 2.6% (+15.6)#301
4. Squaw Lake 16.7% 2.5% (+14.2)#4 2.6% (+14.1)#349
5. Norcross 16.0% 2.5% (+13.5)#5 2.6% (+13.4)#381
6. Hackensack 15.0% 2.5% (+12.6)#6 2.6% (+12.5)#424
7. Florence 14.3% 2.5% (+11.8)#7 2.6% (+11.7)#475
8. Beltrami 13.5% 2.5% (+11.0)#8 2.6% (+10.9)#527
9. Crown College 12.7% 2.5% (+10.2)#9 2.6% (+10.1)#587
10. Kerrick 12.5% 2.5% (+10.0)#10 2.6% (+9.94)#613
11. Ironton 12.1% 2.5% (+9.64)#11 2.6% (+9.56)#643
12. Quamba 12.1% 2.5% (+9.64)#12 2.6% (+9.56)#648
13. Marion 12.0% 2.5% (+9.54)#13 2.6% (+9.46)#663
14. Orr 11.9% 2.5% (+9.45)#14 2.6% (+9.37)#673
15. Watson 11.8% 2.5% (+9.35)#15 2.6% (+9.27)#682
16. Silver Bay 11.6% 2.5% (+9.10)#16 2.6% (+9.02)#706
17. Cromwell 11.1% 2.5% (+8.63)#17 2.6% (+8.55)#766
18. Pease 11.1% 2.5% (+8.63)#18 2.6% (+8.55)#769
19. Ronneby 11.1% 2.5% (+8.63)#19 2.6% (+8.55)#775
20. South Haven 10.4% 2.5% (+7.90)#20 2.6% (+7.81)#864
21. Evansville 10.1% 2.5% (+7.65)#21 2.6% (+7.57)#909
22. Milaca 9.3% 2.5% (+6.80)#22 2.6% (+6.72)#1,082
23. St. John's University 8.8% 2.5% (+6.28)#23 2.6% (+6.20)#1,216
24. Naytahwaush 8.6% 2.5% (+6.09)#24 2.6% (+6.01)#1,268
25. Brookston 8.6% 2.5% (+6.09)#25 2.6% (+6.01)#1,273
26. Elizabeth 8.3% 2.5% (+5.85)#26 2.6% (+5.77)#1,334
27. Whalan 8.3% 2.5% (+5.85)#27 2.6% (+5.77)#1,340
28. Waite Park 8.0% 2.5% (+5.54)#28 2.6% (+5.45)#1,430
29. Waubun 7.9% 2.5% (+5.47)#29 2.6% (+5.38)#1,457
30. Moose Lake 7.8% 2.5% (+5.37)#30 2.6% (+5.29)#1,492
31. Longville 7.8% 2.5% (+5.36)#31 2.6% (+5.28)#1,496
32. Argyle 7.8% 2.5% (+5.33)#32 2.6% (+5.25)#1,511
33. Bluffton 7.8% 2.5% (+5.28)#33 2.6% (+5.20)#1,529
34. Vineland 7.7% 2.5% (+5.21)#34 2.6% (+5.13)#1,539
35. Brooks 7.7% 2.5% (+5.21)#35 2.6% (+5.13)#1,550
36. Evan 7.7% 2.5% (+5.21)#36 2.6% (+5.13)#1,557
37. Round Lake 7.5% 2.5% (+4.97)#37 2.6% (+4.89)#1,649
38. St Rosa 7.4% 2.5% (+4.93)#38 2.6% (+4.84)#1,664
39. Winger 7.3% 2.5% (+4.84)#39 2.6% (+4.75)#1,691
40. Remer 7.2% 2.5% (+4.71)#40 2.6% (+4.63)#1,737
41. Red Lake 7.1% 2.5% (+4.65)#41 2.6% (+4.57)#1,773
42. Lyle 7.1% 2.5% (+4.63)#42 2.6% (+4.55)#1,776
43. Foxhome 7.0% 2.5% (+4.54)#43 2.6% (+4.46)#1,821
44. Hallock 7.0% 2.5% (+4.47)#44 2.6% (+4.39)#1,854
45. Morgan 6.9% 2.5% (+4.44)#45 2.6% (+4.36)#1,872
46. Felton 6.9% 2.5% (+4.42)#46 2.6% (+4.33)#1,892
47. Montgomery 6.8% 2.5% (+4.31)#47 2.6% (+4.23)#1,946
48. St Marys Point 6.8% 2.5% (+4.31)#48 2.6% (+4.22)#1,947
49. Hokah 6.7% 2.5% (+4.24)#49 2.6% (+4.15)#1,982
50. Bingham Lake 6.7% 2.5% (+4.19)#50 2.6% (+4.10)#2,008
51. Lake Wilson 6.6% 2.5% (+4.12)#51 2.6% (+4.04)#2,038
52. Fountain 6.6% 2.5% (+4.09)#52 2.6% (+4.01)#2,055
53. Nett Lake 6.6% 2.5% (+4.08)#53 2.6% (+3.99)#2,069
54. Garden City 6.5% 2.5% (+3.97)#54 2.6% (+3.89)#2,130
55. Kilkenny 6.5% 2.5% (+3.97)#55 2.6% (+3.89)#2,133
56. Bellingham 6.4% 2.5% (+3.93)#56 2.6% (+3.85)#2,163
57. Preston 6.3% 2.5% (+3.83)#57 2.6% (+3.75)#2,230
58. Lake Benton 6.3% 2.5% (+3.81)#58 2.6% (+3.72)#2,252
59. Mora 6.2% 2.5% (+3.77)#59 2.6% (+3.69)#2,278
60. Marble 6.2% 2.5% (+3.77)#60 2.6% (+3.69)#2,282
61. Milroy 6.1% 2.5% (+3.61)#61 2.6% (+3.52)#2,403
62. Whipholt 6.1% 2.5% (+3.58)#62 2.6% (+3.50)#2,431
63. Kinney 6.0% 2.5% (+3.52)#63 2.6% (+3.44)#2,469
64. New Richland 6.0% 2.5% (+3.49)#64 2.6% (+3.41)#2,487
65. Goodhue 5.9% 2.5% (+3.47)#65 2.6% (+3.38)#2,503
66. Glyndon 5.8% 2.5% (+3.31)#66 2.6% (+3.23)#2,647
67. Chisholm 5.7% 2.5% (+3.27)#67 2.6% (+3.19)#2,683
68. Wright 5.7% 2.5% (+3.23)#68 2.6% (+3.15)#2,716
69. Rushford 5.7% 2.5% (+3.22)#69 2.6% (+3.14)#2,726
70. Nevis 5.7% 2.5% (+3.22)#70 2.6% (+3.14)#2,727
71. Lonsdale 5.7% 2.5% (+3.20)#71 2.6% (+3.12)#2,740
72. Granite Falls 5.7% 2.5% (+3.18)#72 2.6% (+3.09)#2,772
73. Breckenridge 5.6% 2.5% (+3.17)#73 2.6% (+3.09)#2,780
74. Dundas 5.6% 2.5% (+3.16)#74 2.6% (+3.08)#2,785
75. Cass Lake 5.6% 2.5% (+3.13)#75 2.6% (+3.05)#2,816
76. Clearbrook 5.6% 2.5% (+3.08)#76 2.6% (+2.99)#2,859
77. New York Mills 5.5% 2.5% (+3.04)#77 2.6% (+2.95)#2,908
78. Grey Eagle 5.5% 2.5% (+3.04)#78 2.6% (+2.95)#2,909
79. Stewartville 5.5% 2.5% (+3.00)#79 2.6% (+2.92)#2,934
80. Cook 5.5% 2.5% (+2.98)#80 2.6% (+2.90)#2,950
81. Henderson 5.4% 2.5% (+2.94)#81 2.6% (+2.86)#2,992
82. Hinckley 5.4% 2.5% (+2.92)#82 2.6% (+2.84)#3,001
83. Hollandale 5.4% 2.5% (+2.90)#83 2.6% (+2.82)#3,027
84. Echo 5.3% 2.5% (+2.86)#84 2.6% (+2.78)#3,061
85. White Earth 5.3% 2.5% (+2.86)#85 2.6% (+2.78)#3,063
86. Falcon Heights 5.3% 2.5% (+2.85)#86 2.6% (+2.77)#3,074
87. Wheaton 5.3% 2.5% (+2.82)#87 2.6% (+2.74)#3,101
88. Elko New Market 5.3% 2.5% (+2.82)#88 2.6% (+2.73)#3,106
89. Mcgregor 5.2% 2.5% (+2.76)#89 2.6% (+2.67)#3,174
90. Goodview 5.1% 2.5% (+2.64)#90 2.6% (+2.56)#3,295
91. Elbow Lake 5.1% 2.5% (+2.62)#91 2.6% (+2.53)#3,328
92. Circle Pines 5.1% 2.5% (+2.60)#92 2.6% (+2.52)#3,351
93. Osage 5.1% 2.5% (+2.58)#93 2.6% (+2.50)#3,369
94. Northfield 5.0% 2.5% (+2.55)#94 2.6% (+2.47)#3,416
95. Jackson 5.0% 2.5% (+2.54)#95 2.6% (+2.46)#3,425
96. Columbus 5.0% 2.5% (+2.53)#96 2.6% (+2.45)#3,441
97. Erhard 5.0% 2.5% (+2.52)#97 2.6% (+2.44)#3,468
98. Revere 5.0% 2.5% (+2.52)#98 2.6% (+2.44)#3,479
99. Newfolden 5.0% 2.5% (+2.50)#99 2.6% (+2.42)#3,504
100. Ogilvie 5.0% 2.5% (+2.50)#100 2.6% (+2.41)#3,506

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota are:
#1
39.4%
#2
18.5%
#3
18.2%
#4
16.7%
#5
16.0%
#6
15.0%
#7
14.3%
#8
13.5%
#9
12.5%
#10
12.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota?
Ball Club has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota with 39.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Minnesota is 2.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States is 2.6%.