Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Healthcare Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Maryland
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Edesville 100.0% 2.8% (+97.2)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#14
2. Hutton 51.7% 2.8% (+48.9)#2 3.3% (+48.4)#76
3. Sandy Hook 45.8% 2.8% (+43.0)#3 3.3% (+42.5)#109
4. Flintstone 35.0% 2.8% (+32.2)#4 3.3% (+31.7)#181
5. Gorman 34.5% 2.8% (+31.7)#5 3.3% (+31.2)#189
6. Yarrowsburg 33.0% 2.8% (+30.2)#6 3.3% (+29.8)#210
7. Spring Gap 32.1% 2.8% (+29.3)#7 3.3% (+28.9)#220
8. Maryland Park 26.1% 2.8% (+23.3)#8 3.3% (+22.9)#331
9. Bier 19.8% 2.8% (+17.0)#9 3.3% (+16.5)#561
10. Jugtown 19.5% 2.8% (+16.7)#10 3.3% (+16.2)#578
11. Federalsburg 16.4% 2.8% (+13.6)#11 3.3% (+13.1)#781
12. Corriganville 15.2% 2.8% (+12.3)#12 3.3% (+11.9)#929
13. Marydel 14.6% 2.8% (+11.8)#13 3.3% (+11.3)#1,010
14. Still Pond 14.5% 2.8% (+11.7)#14 3.3% (+11.3)#1,015
15. Bladensburg 14.0% 2.8% (+11.2)#15 3.3% (+10.7)#1,121
16. Woodsboro 13.8% 2.8% (+11.0)#16 3.3% (+10.6)#1,147
17. Libertytown 12.7% 2.8% (+9.87)#17 3.3% (+9.40)#1,400
18. New Carrollton 10.8% 2.8% (+7.96)#18 3.3% (+7.49)#1,982
19. Lonaconing 9.1% 2.8% (+6.33)#19 3.3% (+5.86)#2,748
20. Cedarville 9.0% 2.8% (+6.22)#20 3.3% (+5.75)#2,834
21. Crisfield 8.8% 2.8% (+5.99)#21 3.3% (+5.52)#2,948
22. East New Market 8.8% 2.8% (+5.98)#22 3.3% (+5.51)#2,959
23. Spencerville 8.8% 2.8% (+5.94)#23 3.3% (+5.47)#2,981
24. Leisure World 8.7% 2.8% (+5.92)#24 3.3% (+5.45)#2,997
25. Eldorado 8.7% 2.8% (+5.89)#25 3.3% (+5.42)#3,030
26. Williamsport 8.6% 2.8% (+5.78)#26 3.3% (+5.31)#3,101
27. White Oak 8.5% 2.8% (+5.72)#27 3.3% (+5.25)#3,144
28. West Denton 8.2% 2.8% (+5.35)#28 3.3% (+4.88)#3,419
29. Milford Mill 8.1% 2.8% (+5.34)#29 3.3% (+4.87)#3,425
30. Clear Spring 8.1% 2.8% (+5.34)#30 3.3% (+4.86)#3,428
31. Fruitland 8.0% 2.8% (+5.17)#31 3.3% (+4.70)#3,558
32. Princess Anne 7.9% 2.8% (+5.11)#32 3.3% (+4.64)#3,605
33. Fairland 7.9% 2.8% (+5.06)#33 3.3% (+4.58)#3,647
34. Greensboro 7.7% 2.8% (+4.92)#34 3.3% (+4.45)#3,765
35. Cambridge 7.6% 2.8% (+4.83)#35 3.3% (+4.35)#3,861
36. Fairplay 7.6% 2.8% (+4.82)#36 3.3% (+4.34)#3,867
37. Romancoke 7.5% 2.8% (+4.70)#37 3.3% (+4.23)#3,972
38. Derwood 7.1% 2.8% (+4.28)#38 3.3% (+3.81)#4,393
39. Landover 7.0% 2.8% (+4.18)#39 3.3% (+3.71)#4,508
40. Lochearn 6.9% 2.8% (+4.10)#40 3.3% (+3.63)#4,584
41. Barton 6.7% 2.8% (+3.93)#41 3.3% (+3.46)#4,774
42. District Heights 6.7% 2.8% (+3.92)#42 3.3% (+3.45)#4,792
43. Drum Point 6.7% 2.8% (+3.92)#43 3.3% (+3.45)#4,793
44. Beaver Creek 6.7% 2.8% (+3.89)#44 3.3% (+3.42)#4,824
45. Mccoole 6.5% 2.8% (+3.70)#45 3.3% (+3.22)#5,072
46. Highland Beach 6.5% 2.8% (+3.64)#46 3.3% (+3.17)#5,153
47. Lake Arbor 6.4% 2.8% (+3.62)#47 3.3% (+3.15)#5,193
48. Taneytown 6.4% 2.8% (+3.61)#48 3.3% (+3.14)#5,204
49. Glenarden 6.4% 2.8% (+3.59)#49 3.3% (+3.12)#5,229
50. Potomac Park 6.4% 2.8% (+3.57)#50 3.3% (+3.10)#5,259
51. Springdale 6.3% 2.8% (+3.49)#51 3.3% (+3.02)#5,348
52. Edgemont 6.2% 2.8% (+3.36)#52 3.3% (+2.88)#5,545
53. Andrews Afb 6.1% 2.8% (+3.25)#53 3.3% (+2.78)#5,714
54. Fairmount Heights 6.0% 2.8% (+3.22)#54 3.3% (+2.75)#5,749
55. Seabrook 6.0% 2.8% (+3.18)#55 3.3% (+2.70)#5,823
56. Salisbury 6.0% 2.8% (+3.15)#56 3.3% (+2.68)#5,860
57. Mount Rainier 5.9% 2.8% (+3.12)#57 3.3% (+2.65)#5,916
58. St Leonard 5.9% 2.8% (+3.04)#58 3.3% (+2.57)#6,030
59. Lusby 5.8% 2.8% (+2.97)#59 3.3% (+2.50)#6,133
60. Cottage City 5.8% 2.8% (+2.97)#60 3.3% (+2.50)#6,139
61. Pocomoke City 5.7% 2.8% (+2.93)#61 3.3% (+2.46)#6,200
62. Church Hill 5.7% 2.8% (+2.92)#62 3.3% (+2.45)#6,223
63. Perryville 5.7% 2.8% (+2.91)#63 3.3% (+2.44)#6,235
64. Henderson 5.7% 2.8% (+2.91)#64 3.3% (+2.43)#6,252
65. Marlow Heights 5.5% 2.8% (+2.73)#65 3.3% (+2.25)#6,565
66. Berlin 5.5% 2.8% (+2.71)#66 3.3% (+2.24)#6,589
67. Rosedale 5.5% 2.8% (+2.68)#67 3.3% (+2.21)#6,615
68. Layhill 5.4% 2.8% (+2.61)#68 3.3% (+2.13)#6,752
69. Walker Mill 5.3% 2.8% (+2.54)#69 3.3% (+2.06)#6,883
70. Summerfield 5.3% 2.8% (+2.46)#70 3.3% (+1.99)#7,035
71. Chesapeake Ranch Estates 5.2% 2.8% (+2.40)#71 3.3% (+1.93)#7,148
72. South Laurel 5.2% 2.8% (+2.37)#72 3.3% (+1.90)#7,202
73. Crownsville 5.2% 2.8% (+2.36)#73 3.3% (+1.89)#7,229
74. Beltsville 5.1% 2.8% (+2.32)#74 3.3% (+1.85)#7,321
75. Halfway 5.1% 2.8% (+2.30)#75 3.3% (+1.83)#7,349
76. Cumberland 5.1% 2.8% (+2.29)#76 3.3% (+1.82)#7,391
77. Delmar 5.1% 2.8% (+2.29)#77 3.3% (+1.82)#7,396
78. Bowling Green 5.1% 2.8% (+2.28)#78 3.3% (+1.81)#7,416
79. Lansdowne 5.1% 2.8% (+2.26)#79 3.3% (+1.79)#7,447
80. Cheverly 5.0% 2.8% (+2.16)#80 3.3% (+1.69)#7,692
81. Vienna 4.9% 2.8% (+2.12)#81 3.3% (+1.65)#7,773
82. Hagerstown 4.9% 2.8% (+2.10)#82 3.3% (+1.63)#7,809
83. Woodlawn Cdp Prince George S County 4.9% 2.8% (+2.10)#83 3.3% (+1.63)#7,817
84. Chesapeake City 4.9% 2.8% (+2.09)#84 3.3% (+1.62)#7,836
85. Zihlman 4.9% 2.8% (+2.07)#85 3.3% (+1.60)#7,879
86. Adelphi 4.8% 2.8% (+2.01)#86 3.3% (+1.54)#7,990
87. Kettering 4.8% 2.8% (+2.00)#87 3.3% (+1.53)#8,025
88. Edgewood 4.7% 2.8% (+1.93)#88 3.3% (+1.46)#8,181
89. Millington 4.7% 2.8% (+1.89)#89 3.3% (+1.42)#8,277
90. Kennedyville 4.6% 2.8% (+1.81)#90 3.3% (+1.34)#8,488
91. Baltimore Highlands 4.6% 2.8% (+1.79)#91 3.3% (+1.32)#8,528
92. Hurlock 4.6% 2.8% (+1.75)#92 3.3% (+1.28)#8,610
93. Ellerslie 4.5% 2.8% (+1.74)#93 3.3% (+1.27)#8,642
94. Bowmans Addition 4.5% 2.8% (+1.66)#94 3.3% (+1.19)#8,829
95. Owings Mills 4.5% 2.8% (+1.66)#95 3.3% (+1.19)#8,831
96. Tilghman Island 4.4% 2.8% (+1.61)#96 3.3% (+1.14)#8,960
97. Rock Hall 4.4% 2.8% (+1.61)#97 3.3% (+1.14)#8,968
98. Bowleys Quarters 4.4% 2.8% (+1.57)#98 3.3% (+1.10)#9,035
99. Flower Hill 4.4% 2.8% (+1.55)#99 3.3% (+1.08)#9,090
100. Randallstown 4.3% 2.8% (+1.50)#100 3.3% (+1.03)#9,226

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland are:
#1
100.0%
#2
51.7%
#3
45.8%
#4
35.0%
#5
34.5%
#6
33.0%
#7
32.1%
#8
19.8%
#9
19.5%
#10
16.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland?
Edesville has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the State of Maryland?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Maryland is 2.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States is 3.3%.