Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Healthcare Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. New Woodville 100.0% 3.0% (+97.0)#1 3.3% (+96.7)#18
2. Bee 70.6% 3.0% (+67.6)#2 3.3% (+67.3)#36
3. Mutual 54.5% 3.0% (+51.6)#3 3.3% (+51.3)#70
4. Fairmont 35.0% 3.0% (+32.0)#4 3.3% (+31.7)#182
5. Nelagoney 33.3% 3.0% (+30.4)#5 3.3% (+30.1)#200
6. Dixon 32.9% 3.0% (+30.0)#6 3.3% (+29.7)#212
7. Bowring 31.4% 3.0% (+28.5)#7 3.3% (+28.1)#231
8. Boynton 31.4% 3.0% (+28.4)#8 3.3% (+28.1)#232
9. Tuskahoma 28.6% 3.0% (+25.6)#9 3.3% (+25.3)#279
10. Macomb 28.6% 3.0% (+25.6)#10 3.3% (+25.3)#281
11. Eldorado 24.5% 3.0% (+21.6)#11 3.3% (+21.2)#366
12. Kinta 23.6% 3.0% (+20.6)#12 3.3% (+20.3)#388
13. Murphy 21.3% 3.0% (+18.3)#13 3.3% (+18.0)#484
14. Sportmans Shores 20.8% 3.0% (+17.9)#14 3.3% (+17.6)#502
15. Castle 20.5% 3.0% (+17.6)#15 3.3% (+17.2)#517
16. St Louis 20.5% 3.0% (+17.6)#16 3.3% (+17.2)#518
17. Earl 19.5% 3.0% (+16.6)#17 3.3% (+16.2)#575
18. Grayson 19.4% 3.0% (+16.5)#18 3.3% (+16.2)#580
19. Ingalls 18.3% 3.0% (+15.3)#19 3.3% (+15.0)#646
20. Weleetka 18.2% 3.0% (+15.2)#20 3.3% (+14.9)#655
21. Ballou 18.0% 3.0% (+15.0)#21 3.3% (+14.7)#671
22. Carlisle 17.5% 3.0% (+14.5)#22 3.3% (+14.2)#706
23. Blue 17.1% 3.0% (+14.2)#23 3.3% (+13.9)#727
24. Mead 17.0% 3.0% (+14.0)#24 3.3% (+13.7)#744
25. Bridgeport 16.7% 3.0% (+13.7)#25 3.3% (+13.4)#758
26. Wickliffe 15.9% 3.0% (+13.0)#26 3.3% (+12.7)#827
27. Porum 15.2% 3.0% (+12.2)#27 3.3% (+11.9)#928
28. Perkins 14.9% 3.0% (+11.9)#28 3.3% (+11.6)#966
29. Cave Spring 14.3% 3.0% (+11.3)#29 3.3% (+11.0)#1,065
30. Skedee 14.3% 3.0% (+11.3)#30 3.3% (+11.0)#1,069
31. Lenapah 13.8% 3.0% (+10.8)#31 3.3% (+10.5)#1,153
32. Fair Oaks 13.6% 3.0% (+10.7)#32 3.3% (+10.4)#1,189
33. Nicut 13.2% 3.0% (+10.3)#33 3.3% (+9.93)#1,278
34. Tenkiller 13.1% 3.0% (+10.1)#34 3.3% (+9.80)#1,309
35. Marble City 13.0% 3.0% (+10.0)#35 3.3% (+9.68)#1,329
36. Wauhillau 12.8% 3.0% (+9.87)#36 3.3% (+9.54)#1,357
37. Stuart 12.8% 3.0% (+9.87)#37 3.3% (+9.54)#1,362
38. Taft 12.8% 3.0% (+9.87)#38 3.3% (+9.54)#1,363
39. Wann 12.8% 3.0% (+9.81)#39 3.3% (+9.49)#1,376
40. Cement 12.3% 3.0% (+9.38)#40 3.3% (+9.06)#1,494
41. Lookeba 12.2% 3.0% (+9.24)#41 3.3% (+8.92)#1,534
42. Warner 11.9% 3.0% (+8.91)#42 3.3% (+8.59)#1,618
43. Rocky Ford 11.6% 3.0% (+8.62)#43 3.3% (+8.30)#1,702
44. Lima 11.5% 3.0% (+8.58)#44 3.3% (+8.26)#1,723
45. Watova 11.5% 3.0% (+8.58)#45 3.3% (+8.26)#1,727
46. Indiahoma 11.4% 3.0% (+8.41)#46 3.3% (+8.08)#1,775
47. Redbird Smith 11.1% 3.0% (+8.19)#47 3.3% (+7.87)#1,843
48. Terlton 11.1% 3.0% (+8.16)#48 3.3% (+7.83)#1,876
49. Simms 11.0% 3.0% (+8.06)#49 3.3% (+7.74)#1,899
50. Pensacola 10.9% 3.0% (+7.91)#50 3.3% (+7.59)#1,948
51. Moffett 10.5% 3.0% (+7.57)#51 3.3% (+7.25)#2,066
52. Lahoma 10.5% 3.0% (+7.52)#52 3.3% (+7.20)#2,089
53. Milburn 10.5% 3.0% (+7.52)#53 3.3% (+7.20)#2,090
54. Bokoshe 10.4% 3.0% (+7.41)#54 3.3% (+7.09)#2,139
55. Hoffman 10.3% 3.0% (+7.39)#55 3.3% (+7.07)#2,155
56. Taloga 10.3% 3.0% (+7.36)#56 3.3% (+7.04)#2,171
57. Achille 10.3% 3.0% (+7.33)#57 3.3% (+7.01)#2,184
58. Johnson 10.1% 3.0% (+7.19)#58 3.3% (+6.87)#2,243
59. Wewoka 10.1% 3.0% (+7.18)#59 3.3% (+6.86)#2,247
60. Bennington 10.1% 3.0% (+7.15)#60 3.3% (+6.82)#2,268
61. Foyil 10.1% 3.0% (+7.13)#61 3.3% (+6.80)#2,281
62. Okemah 10.0% 3.0% (+7.07)#62 3.3% (+6.75)#2,296
63. Tamaha 10.0% 3.0% (+7.04)#63 3.3% (+6.72)#2,313
64. Council Hill 10.0% 3.0% (+7.04)#64 3.3% (+6.72)#2,321
65. White Oak 9.9% 3.0% (+6.90)#65 3.3% (+6.58)#2,399
66. Jennings 9.7% 3.0% (+6.75)#66 3.3% (+6.43)#2,465
67. Baron 9.7% 3.0% (+6.74)#67 3.3% (+6.42)#2,475
68. Mccord 9.6% 3.0% (+6.69)#68 3.3% (+6.36)#2,499
69. Greenville 9.6% 3.0% (+6.66)#69 3.3% (+6.34)#2,510
70. Pocola 9.6% 3.0% (+6.65)#70 3.3% (+6.32)#2,515
71. Calvin 9.6% 3.0% (+6.64)#71 3.3% (+6.32)#2,519
72. Erick 9.6% 3.0% (+6.60)#72 3.3% (+6.27)#2,542
73. Ryan 9.5% 3.0% (+6.59)#73 3.3% (+6.26)#2,548
74. Vinita 9.5% 3.0% (+6.58)#74 3.3% (+6.25)#2,552
75. Mallard Bay 9.5% 3.0% (+6.57)#75 3.3% (+6.24)#2,556
76. Wayne 9.4% 3.0% (+6.46)#76 3.3% (+6.14)#2,607
77. Clayton 9.4% 3.0% (+6.43)#77 3.3% (+6.11)#2,625
78. Tishomingo 9.3% 3.0% (+6.35)#78 3.3% (+6.03)#2,669
79. Dougherty 9.2% 3.0% (+6.26)#79 3.3% (+5.93)#2,709
80. Chewey 9.2% 3.0% (+6.24)#80 3.3% (+5.92)#2,717
81. Delaware 9.2% 3.0% (+6.22)#81 3.3% (+5.89)#2,727
82. Asher 9.2% 3.0% (+6.21)#82 3.3% (+5.89)#2,730
83. Sweetwater 9.1% 3.0% (+6.14)#83 3.3% (+5.81)#2,784
84. Kildare 9.1% 3.0% (+6.14)#84 3.3% (+5.81)#2,793
85. Blanco 9.1% 3.0% (+6.14)#85 3.3% (+5.81)#2,794
86. Maramec 9.1% 3.0% (+6.14)#86 3.3% (+5.81)#2,799
87. Stidham 9.1% 3.0% (+6.14)#87 3.3% (+5.81)#2,802
88. Wanette 8.9% 3.0% (+5.93)#88 3.3% (+5.61)#2,899
89. Fort Cobb 8.9% 3.0% (+5.92)#89 3.3% (+5.60)#2,912
90. Geary 8.7% 3.0% (+5.79)#90 3.3% (+5.47)#2,982
91. Amber 8.6% 3.0% (+5.69)#91 3.3% (+5.37)#3,059
92. Ochelata 8.6% 3.0% (+5.67)#92 3.3% (+5.34)#3,083
93. Watonga 8.6% 3.0% (+5.66)#93 3.3% (+5.33)#3,091
94. Boley 8.6% 3.0% (+5.65)#94 3.3% (+5.32)#3,095
95. Tupelo 8.5% 3.0% (+5.59)#95 3.3% (+5.27)#3,133
96. Langley 8.4% 3.0% (+5.49)#96 3.3% (+5.17)#3,207
97. Bluejacket 8.4% 3.0% (+5.46)#97 3.3% (+5.13)#3,228
98. Vian 8.3% 3.0% (+5.36)#98 3.3% (+5.04)#3,305
99. Valliant 8.3% 3.0% (+5.34)#99 3.3% (+5.02)#3,313
100. Billings 8.3% 3.0% (+5.33)#100 3.3% (+5.00)#3,321

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
70.6%
#3
54.5%
#4
35.0%
#5
31.4%
#6
28.6%
#7
28.6%
#8
24.5%
#9
23.6%
#10
21.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma?
New Woodville has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma is 3.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States is 3.3%.