Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Food Preparation & Serving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. La Moca Ranch 100.0% 5.4% (+94.6)#1 5.3% (+94.7)#18
2. Carrizo Hill 84.0% 5.4% (+78.7)#2 5.3% (+78.8)#39
3. La Loma De Falcon 65.4% 5.4% (+60.0)#3 5.3% (+60.1)#59
4. Amargosa 62.0% 5.4% (+56.6)#4 5.3% (+56.7)#66
5. Ranchette Estates 61.7% 5.4% (+56.4)#5 5.3% (+56.4)#67
6. Domino 60.0% 5.4% (+54.6)#6 5.3% (+54.7)#72
7. Centerville 59.5% 5.4% (+54.2)#7 5.3% (+54.2)#75
8. Marathon 58.4% 5.4% (+53.1)#8 5.3% (+53.2)#79
9. Loma Vista 54.7% 5.4% (+49.4)#9 5.3% (+49.5)#88
10. May 53.0% 5.4% (+47.7)#10 5.3% (+47.7)#98
11. Benjamin Perez 52.9% 5.4% (+47.5)#11 5.3% (+47.6)#99
12. Flowella 50.0% 5.4% (+44.6)#12 5.3% (+44.7)#115
13. Mcleod 42.5% 5.4% (+37.1)#13 5.3% (+37.2)#163
14. Tierra Bonita 40.6% 5.4% (+35.3)#14 5.3% (+35.3)#182
15. Blessing 40.0% 5.4% (+34.6)#15 5.3% (+34.7)#189
16. Miller S Cove 36.7% 5.4% (+31.3)#16 5.3% (+31.4)#228
17. Campo Verde 36.5% 5.4% (+31.1)#17 5.3% (+31.2)#230
18. Lamar 36.2% 5.4% (+30.8)#18 5.3% (+30.9)#232
19. El Quiote 33.3% 5.4% (+28.0)#19 5.3% (+28.0)#274
20. Sunrise Shores 30.6% 5.4% (+25.3)#20 5.3% (+25.3)#330
21. Petty 29.8% 5.4% (+24.5)#21 5.3% (+24.5)#353
22. Pueblo Nuevo 29.6% 5.4% (+24.2)#22 5.3% (+24.3)#359
23. Myra 29.1% 5.4% (+23.8)#23 5.3% (+23.8)#368
24. Las Lomitas 29.0% 5.4% (+23.7)#24 5.3% (+23.7)#372
25. Salineno North 28.6% 5.4% (+23.2)#25 5.3% (+23.3)#383
26. Markham 28.5% 5.4% (+23.1)#26 5.3% (+23.2)#387
27. La Tina Ranch 27.4% 5.4% (+22.0)#27 5.3% (+22.1)#417
28. Falfurrias 27.1% 5.4% (+21.8)#28 5.3% (+21.8)#424
29. Christoval 26.7% 5.4% (+21.4)#29 5.3% (+21.4)#443
30. Preston 26.0% 5.4% (+20.7)#30 5.3% (+20.7)#469
31. Valera 25.0% 5.4% (+19.6)#31 5.3% (+19.7)#509
32. Franklin 24.8% 5.4% (+19.4)#32 5.3% (+19.5)#516
33. Lueders 24.3% 5.4% (+19.0)#33 5.3% (+19.0)#536
34. Big Thicket Lake Estates 23.7% 5.4% (+18.4)#34 5.3% (+18.4)#567
35. Tenaha 23.5% 5.4% (+18.1)#35 5.3% (+18.2)#585
36. Mckinney Acres 23.0% 5.4% (+17.6)#36 5.3% (+17.7)#617
37. Goodrich 22.9% 5.4% (+17.6)#37 5.3% (+17.6)#621
38. Louise 22.7% 5.4% (+17.4)#38 5.3% (+17.4)#637
39. Hearne 22.3% 5.4% (+16.9)#39 5.3% (+17.0)#656
40. Port Mansfield 22.2% 5.4% (+16.9)#40 5.3% (+16.9)#665
41. Garza Salinas Ii 22.1% 5.4% (+16.8)#41 5.3% (+16.9)#676
42. Tornillo 22.0% 5.4% (+16.6)#42 5.3% (+16.7)#679
43. North Pearsall 21.8% 5.4% (+16.4)#43 5.3% (+16.5)#690
44. San Augustine 21.7% 5.4% (+16.3)#44 5.3% (+16.4)#699
45. Chillicothe 21.4% 5.4% (+16.0)#45 5.3% (+16.1)#717
46. Lackland Afb 21.3% 5.4% (+16.0)#46 5.3% (+16.0)#720
47. Sammy Martinez 20.9% 5.4% (+15.6)#47 5.3% (+15.6)#743
48. Batesville 20.6% 5.4% (+15.2)#48 5.3% (+15.3)#778
49. Rocksprings 20.2% 5.4% (+14.8)#49 5.3% (+14.9)#822
50. Timpson 20.1% 5.4% (+14.7)#50 5.3% (+14.8)#829
51. Westminster 20.1% 5.4% (+14.7)#51 5.3% (+14.8)#831
52. Elm Creek 19.8% 5.4% (+14.5)#52 5.3% (+14.6)#862
53. Runge 19.8% 5.4% (+14.5)#53 5.3% (+14.5)#864
54. Taft Southwest 19.8% 5.4% (+14.4)#54 5.3% (+14.5)#865
55. Welch 18.8% 5.4% (+13.5)#55 5.3% (+13.6)#964
56. Pleasant Valley 18.7% 5.4% (+13.4)#56 5.3% (+13.4)#980
57. San Pedro 18.3% 5.4% (+12.9)#57 5.3% (+13.0)#1,030
58. Aquilla 18.2% 5.4% (+12.8)#58 5.3% (+12.9)#1,043
59. Palo Pinto 18.0% 5.4% (+12.6)#59 5.3% (+12.7)#1,066
60. Wadsworth 17.7% 5.4% (+12.3)#60 5.3% (+12.4)#1,101
61. Dickens 17.6% 5.4% (+12.3)#61 5.3% (+12.4)#1,108
62. Wixon Valley 17.5% 5.4% (+12.2)#62 5.3% (+12.3)#1,121
63. Valle Vista 17.5% 5.4% (+12.2)#63 5.3% (+12.2)#1,123
64. Colorado City 17.5% 5.4% (+12.2)#64 5.3% (+12.2)#1,125
65. Oak Island 17.5% 5.4% (+12.1)#65 5.3% (+12.2)#1,133
66. San Juan 17.4% 5.4% (+12.0)#66 5.3% (+12.1)#1,152
67. San Ygnacio 17.3% 5.4% (+11.9)#67 5.3% (+12.0)#1,170
68. Novice 17.2% 5.4% (+11.9)#68 5.3% (+12.0)#1,173
69. Post 16.8% 5.4% (+11.4)#69 5.3% (+11.5)#1,227
70. Tulia 16.7% 5.4% (+11.3)#70 5.3% (+11.4)#1,244
71. South Padre Island 16.7% 5.4% (+11.3)#71 5.3% (+11.4)#1,246
72. Emhouse 16.7% 5.4% (+11.3)#72 5.3% (+11.4)#1,257
73. Rochelle 16.6% 5.4% (+11.2)#73 5.3% (+11.3)#1,285
74. Hamilton 16.5% 5.4% (+11.1)#74 5.3% (+11.2)#1,301
75. Brownsboro 16.3% 5.4% (+11.0)#75 5.3% (+11.0)#1,325
76. La Victoria 15.9% 5.4% (+10.6)#76 5.3% (+10.6)#1,424
77. Trinity 15.8% 5.4% (+10.4)#77 5.3% (+10.5)#1,456
78. Staples 15.8% 5.4% (+10.4)#78 5.3% (+10.5)#1,459
79. Rochester 15.4% 5.4% (+10.0)#79 5.3% (+10.1)#1,529
80. Canyon Creek 15.4% 5.4% (+10.0)#80 5.3% (+10.1)#1,541
81. Wheeler 15.3% 5.4% (+9.97)#81 5.3% (+10.0)#1,552
82. Fort Bliss 15.0% 5.4% (+9.61)#82 5.3% (+9.68)#1,647
83. Encinal 14.9% 5.4% (+9.56)#83 5.3% (+9.63)#1,662
84. Tira 14.9% 5.4% (+9.50)#84 5.3% (+9.57)#1,674
85. Crowell 14.8% 5.4% (+9.41)#85 5.3% (+9.47)#1,696
86. Hughes Springs 14.7% 5.4% (+9.32)#86 5.3% (+9.39)#1,716
87. Lampasas 14.6% 5.4% (+9.27)#87 5.3% (+9.34)#1,725
88. George West 14.6% 5.4% (+9.25)#88 5.3% (+9.31)#1,735
89. Garrett 14.5% 5.4% (+9.20)#89 5.3% (+9.26)#1,753
90. Karnes City 14.5% 5.4% (+9.19)#90 5.3% (+9.26)#1,757
91. South La Paloma 14.5% 5.4% (+9.14)#91 5.3% (+9.21)#1,772
92. Tilden 14.3% 5.4% (+8.93)#92 5.3% (+9.00)#1,817
93. Mertens 14.3% 5.4% (+8.93)#93 5.3% (+9.00)#1,828
94. Crosby 14.3% 5.4% (+8.91)#94 5.3% (+8.97)#1,842
95. Boling 14.1% 5.4% (+8.72)#95 5.3% (+8.79)#1,894
96. Fredericksburg 14.0% 5.4% (+8.62)#96 5.3% (+8.69)#1,926
97. Hempstead 13.9% 5.4% (+8.52)#97 5.3% (+8.58)#1,950
98. Crawford 13.9% 5.4% (+8.51)#98 5.3% (+8.57)#1,953
99. Mobeetie 13.8% 5.4% (+8.44)#99 5.3% (+8.51)#1,972
100. Fairfield 13.8% 5.4% (+8.44)#100 5.3% (+8.50)#1,974

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas?
Carrizo Hill has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas with 84.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Texas is 5.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States is 5.3%.