Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Food Preparation & Serving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Wetonka 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#1 5.3% (+94.7)#30
2. Horse Creek 78.6% 5.7% (+72.9)#2 5.3% (+73.3)#42
3. Verdon 75.0% 5.7% (+69.3)#3 5.3% (+69.7)#50
4. Lebanon 59.6% 5.7% (+53.9)#4 5.3% (+54.3)#74
5. Strandburg 42.9% 5.7% (+37.2)#5 5.3% (+37.6)#160
6. Ward 35.0% 5.7% (+29.3)#6 5.3% (+29.7)#255
7. Grassland Colony 33.3% 5.7% (+27.7)#7 5.3% (+28.0)#282
8. Dallas 32.8% 5.7% (+27.1)#8 5.3% (+27.5)#286
9. Hetland 31.2% 5.7% (+25.6)#9 5.3% (+26.0)#314
10. Golden View Colony 26.9% 5.7% (+21.3)#10 5.3% (+21.6)#433
11. Conde 26.0% 5.7% (+20.3)#11 5.3% (+20.7)#472
12. Parmelee 25.0% 5.7% (+19.3)#12 5.3% (+19.7)#500
13. Two Strike 25.0% 5.7% (+19.3)#13 5.3% (+19.7)#501
14. Norris 23.5% 5.7% (+17.9)#14 5.3% (+18.2)#578
15. Fulton 22.5% 5.7% (+16.8)#15 5.3% (+17.2)#642
16. Columbia 20.6% 5.7% (+15.0)#16 5.3% (+15.3)#775
17. Java 20.2% 5.7% (+14.6)#17 5.3% (+15.0)#813
18. Raymond 20.0% 5.7% (+14.3)#18 5.3% (+14.7)#850
19. Blucksberg Mountain 19.5% 5.7% (+13.8)#19 5.3% (+14.2)#896
20. Philip 18.3% 5.7% (+12.7)#20 5.3% (+13.1)#1,024
21. Ravinia 18.2% 5.7% (+12.5)#21 5.3% (+12.9)#1,046
22. Nisland 17.9% 5.7% (+12.2)#22 5.3% (+12.6)#1,088
23. Sturgis 17.7% 5.7% (+12.1)#23 5.3% (+12.4)#1,098
24. White Lake 17.5% 5.7% (+11.9)#24 5.3% (+12.2)#1,131
25. Edgemont 17.2% 5.7% (+11.6)#25 5.3% (+11.9)#1,176
26. Stephan 17.1% 5.7% (+11.5)#26 5.3% (+11.9)#1,188
27. Hot Springs 17.0% 5.7% (+11.3)#27 5.3% (+11.7)#1,211
28. Enemy Swim 16.3% 5.7% (+10.7)#28 5.3% (+11.0)#1,326
29. Fairview 16.1% 5.7% (+10.4)#29 5.3% (+10.8)#1,395
30. Ipswich 15.3% 5.7% (+9.67)#30 5.3% (+10.0)#1,550
31. Camp Crook 15.0% 5.7% (+9.34)#31 5.3% (+9.71)#1,635
32. Spearfish 14.9% 5.7% (+9.22)#32 5.3% (+9.60)#1,668
33. Dupree 14.7% 5.7% (+9.00)#33 5.3% (+9.37)#1,717
34. Renner Corner 14.6% 5.7% (+8.90)#34 5.3% (+9.28)#1,751
35. Summit 14.2% 5.7% (+8.54)#35 5.3% (+8.91)#1,859
36. Murdo 13.9% 5.7% (+8.22)#36 5.3% (+8.59)#1,949
37. Mountain Plains 13.4% 5.7% (+7.75)#37 5.3% (+8.13)#2,101
38. Lemmon 13.2% 5.7% (+7.55)#38 5.3% (+7.93)#2,173
39. Newell 13.2% 5.7% (+7.53)#39 5.3% (+7.90)#2,190
40. Flandreau 12.9% 5.7% (+7.29)#40 5.3% (+7.66)#2,277
41. Pringle 12.9% 5.7% (+7.24)#41 5.3% (+7.62)#2,293
42. Hazel 12.9% 5.7% (+7.24)#42 5.3% (+7.62)#2,296
43. Millerdale Colony 12.5% 5.7% (+6.84)#43 5.3% (+7.21)#2,508
44. Interior 12.5% 5.7% (+6.84)#44 5.3% (+7.21)#2,515
45. Virgil 12.5% 5.7% (+6.84)#45 5.3% (+7.21)#2,523
46. Fruitdale 12.2% 5.7% (+6.53)#46 5.3% (+6.91)#2,650
47. Running Water 12.0% 5.7% (+6.34)#47 5.3% (+6.71)#2,765
48. Gregory 11.9% 5.7% (+6.28)#48 5.3% (+6.66)#2,798
49. New Effington 11.8% 5.7% (+6.10)#49 5.3% (+6.48)#2,893
50. Big Stone City 11.7% 5.7% (+6.09)#50 5.3% (+6.46)#2,908
51. Vermillion 11.7% 5.7% (+6.07)#51 5.3% (+6.44)#2,921
52. Brandt 11.7% 5.7% (+6.01)#52 5.3% (+6.38)#2,964
53. Irene 11.6% 5.7% (+5.91)#53 5.3% (+6.28)#3,029
54. Artesian 11.5% 5.7% (+5.88)#54 5.3% (+6.25)#3,048
55. Harrold 11.3% 5.7% (+5.66)#55 5.3% (+6.03)#3,186
56. Midland 11.3% 5.7% (+5.61)#56 5.3% (+5.98)#3,219
57. Morristown 10.8% 5.7% (+5.15)#57 5.3% (+5.52)#3,511
58. Twin Brooks 10.5% 5.7% (+4.87)#58 5.3% (+5.24)#3,707
59. Pukwana 10.4% 5.7% (+4.78)#59 5.3% (+5.15)#3,769
60. Selby 10.4% 5.7% (+4.71)#60 5.3% (+5.09)#3,812
61. Clark 10.3% 5.7% (+4.68)#61 5.3% (+5.06)#3,833
62. Chester 10.3% 5.7% (+4.66)#62 5.3% (+5.03)#3,855
63. De Smet 9.9% 5.7% (+4.28)#63 5.3% (+4.66)#4,154
64. Emery 9.8% 5.7% (+4.16)#64 5.3% (+4.53)#4,250
65. Chamberlain 9.8% 5.7% (+4.09)#65 5.3% (+4.47)#4,312
66. Johnson Siding 9.7% 5.7% (+4.03)#66 5.3% (+4.40)#4,363
67. Lead 9.7% 5.7% (+4.00)#67 5.3% (+4.38)#4,380
68. Colome 9.6% 5.7% (+3.92)#68 5.3% (+4.29)#4,462
69. Wood 9.5% 5.7% (+3.86)#69 5.3% (+4.24)#4,519
70. Fort Thompson 9.5% 5.7% (+3.83)#70 5.3% (+4.21)#4,542
71. Henry 9.4% 5.7% (+3.71)#71 5.3% (+4.09)#4,664
72. Bullhead 9.3% 5.7% (+3.64)#72 5.3% (+4.02)#4,744
73. Wessington 9.2% 5.7% (+3.51)#73 5.3% (+3.89)#4,863
74. Pollock 9.2% 5.7% (+3.49)#74 5.3% (+3.87)#4,884
75. St Lawrence 8.8% 5.7% (+3.11)#75 5.3% (+3.49)#5,346
76. Whitewood 8.4% 5.7% (+2.72)#76 5.3% (+3.09)#5,810
77. Webster 8.3% 5.7% (+2.67)#77 5.3% (+3.05)#5,857
78. Lake Andes 8.3% 5.7% (+2.67)#78 5.3% (+3.05)#5,861
79. Buffalo 8.3% 5.7% (+2.67)#79 5.3% (+3.05)#5,872
80. Lake Preston 8.3% 5.7% (+2.64)#80 5.3% (+3.01)#5,936
81. Madison 8.2% 5.7% (+2.54)#81 5.3% (+2.92)#6,050
82. Mitchell 8.2% 5.7% (+2.49)#82 5.3% (+2.87)#6,134
83. Letcher 8.1% 5.7% (+2.48)#83 5.3% (+2.85)#6,153
84. Rapid Valley 8.1% 5.7% (+2.43)#84 5.3% (+2.81)#6,209
85. Aberdeen 8.0% 5.7% (+2.35)#85 5.3% (+2.72)#6,318
86. Toronto 7.9% 5.7% (+2.25)#86 5.3% (+2.63)#6,468
87. Deadwood 7.9% 5.7% (+2.24)#87 5.3% (+2.62)#6,481
88. Winner 7.9% 5.7% (+2.20)#88 5.3% (+2.58)#6,552
89. Belle Fourche 7.6% 5.7% (+1.90)#89 5.3% (+2.27)#7,053
90. North Eagle Butte 7.6% 5.7% (+1.89)#90 5.3% (+2.26)#7,059
91. Frederick 7.5% 5.7% (+1.89)#91 5.3% (+2.26)#7,066
92. Scotland 7.5% 5.7% (+1.85)#92 5.3% (+2.22)#7,120
93. Bryant 7.4% 5.7% (+1.70)#93 5.3% (+2.08)#7,340
94. Hecla 7.2% 5.7% (+1.59)#94 5.3% (+1.96)#7,529
95. Crooks 7.2% 5.7% (+1.57)#95 5.3% (+1.95)#7,558
96. Brookings 7.2% 5.7% (+1.54)#96 5.3% (+1.92)#7,612
97. Mina 7.1% 5.7% (+1.48)#97 5.3% (+1.86)#7,715
98. Wallace 7.1% 5.7% (+1.48)#98 5.3% (+1.86)#7,746
99. Altamont 7.1% 5.7% (+1.48)#99 5.3% (+1.86)#7,750
100. Pierre 7.1% 5.7% (+1.47)#100 5.3% (+1.84)#7,767

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
75.0%
#3
59.6%
#4
42.9%
#5
35.0%
#6
32.8%
#7
31.2%
#8
26.0%
#9
25.0%
#10
25.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota?
Wetonka has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in South Dakota is 5.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States is 5.3%.