Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas

4.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Trophy Club 0.38% 19.7% (-19.3)#1 16.9% (-16.6)#39
2. Robinson 0.42% 19.7% (-19.3)#2 16.9% (-16.5)#44
3. Steiner Ranch 0.50% 19.7% (-19.2)#3 16.9% (-16.4)#62
4. Ponder 0.54% 19.7% (-19.1)#4 16.9% (-16.4)#73
5. Paloma Creek South 0.57% 19.7% (-19.1)#5 16.9% (-16.4)#79
6. Dripping Springs 0.59% 19.7% (-19.1)#6 16.9% (-16.4)#89
7. Sienna 0.60% 19.7% (-19.1)#7 16.9% (-16.3)#95
8. Jarrell 0.66% 19.7% (-19.0)#8 16.9% (-16.3)#122
9. Highland Village 0.68% 19.7% (-19.0)#9 16.9% (-16.3)#125
10. Fulshear 0.70% 19.7% (-19.0)#10 16.9% (-16.2)#133
11. Louise 0.78% 19.7% (-18.9)#11 16.9% (-16.2)#163
12. Scotland 0.78% 19.7% (-18.9)#12 16.9% (-16.2)#164
13. Pettus 0.85% 19.7% (-18.8)#13 16.9% (-16.1)#209
14. Cross Roads 0.86% 19.7% (-18.8)#14 16.9% (-16.1)#212
15. Manvel 0.88% 19.7% (-18.8)#15 16.9% (-16.1)#224
16. Bunker Hill Village 0.98% 19.7% (-18.7)#16 16.9% (-16.0)#265
17. Sachse 1.0% 19.7% (-18.6)#17 16.9% (-15.9)#304
18. Bellaire 1.1% 19.7% (-18.6)#18 16.9% (-15.9)#321
19. Potosi 1.1% 19.7% (-18.6)#19 16.9% (-15.9)#329
20. Edom 1.1% 19.7% (-18.6)#20 16.9% (-15.8)#351
21. West University Place 1.2% 19.7% (-18.5)#21 16.9% (-15.8)#379
22. Woodcreek 1.2% 19.7% (-18.5)#22 16.9% (-15.7)#405
23. Randolph Afb 1.3% 19.7% (-18.4)#23 16.9% (-15.7)#431
24. Texhoma 1.3% 19.7% (-18.4)#24 16.9% (-15.6)#446
25. Magnolia 1.4% 19.7% (-18.3)#25 16.9% (-15.6)#485
26. Iowa Colony 1.4% 19.7% (-18.3)#26 16.9% (-15.6)#486
27. Southlake 1.4% 19.7% (-18.3)#27 16.9% (-15.6)#493
28. Shoreacres 1.4% 19.7% (-18.3)#28 16.9% (-15.5)#500
29. Hilshire Village 1.4% 19.7% (-18.3)#29 16.9% (-15.5)#504
30. Poth 1.5% 19.7% (-18.2)#30 16.9% (-15.5)#545
31. Fair Oaks Ranch 1.5% 19.7% (-18.2)#31 16.9% (-15.5)#551
32. Richwood 1.6% 19.7% (-18.1)#32 16.9% (-15.3)#634
33. Lakeside City 1.6% 19.7% (-18.1)#33 16.9% (-15.3)#639
34. China Grove 1.7% 19.7% (-18.0)#34 16.9% (-15.3)#664
35. New Hope 1.7% 19.7% (-18.0)#35 16.9% (-15.3)#668
36. Buchanan Dam 1.7% 19.7% (-18.0)#36 16.9% (-15.3)#681
37. Hill Country Village 1.7% 19.7% (-18.0)#37 16.9% (-15.2)#691
38. Benjamin 1.7% 19.7% (-18.0)#38 16.9% (-15.2)#713
39. Brushy Creek 1.8% 19.7% (-17.9)#39 16.9% (-15.2)#743
40. Tuscola 1.8% 19.7% (-17.9)#40 16.9% (-15.2)#747
41. Liverpool 1.8% 19.7% (-17.9)#41 16.9% (-15.1)#778
42. Frisco 1.9% 19.7% (-17.8)#42 16.9% (-15.0)#835
43. Ingleside On The Bay 1.9% 19.7% (-17.7)#43 16.9% (-15.0)#870
44. Prosper 2.0% 19.7% (-17.7)#44 16.9% (-15.0)#887
45. Annetta 2.0% 19.7% (-17.7)#45 16.9% (-14.9)#926
46. Lake Dallas 2.1% 19.7% (-17.6)#46 16.9% (-14.9)#960
47. Eastland 2.1% 19.7% (-17.6)#47 16.9% (-14.8)#976
48. Saginaw 2.2% 19.7% (-17.5)#48 16.9% (-14.7)#1,048
49. Nordheim 2.2% 19.7% (-17.5)#49 16.9% (-14.7)#1,057
50. Morgan S Point 2.2% 19.7% (-17.5)#50 16.9% (-14.7)#1,059
51. Paradise 2.3% 19.7% (-17.4)#51 16.9% (-14.6)#1,115
52. Runaway Bay 2.3% 19.7% (-17.3)#52 16.9% (-14.6)#1,123
53. Lago Vista 2.3% 19.7% (-17.3)#53 16.9% (-14.6)#1,124
54. Lakeway 2.4% 19.7% (-17.3)#54 16.9% (-14.6)#1,138
55. Anna 2.4% 19.7% (-17.3)#55 16.9% (-14.6)#1,139
56. Grandview 2.4% 19.7% (-17.3)#56 16.9% (-14.6)#1,156
57. Mcqueeney 2.4% 19.7% (-17.3)#57 16.9% (-14.5)#1,163
58. Wellman 2.4% 19.7% (-17.3)#58 16.9% (-14.5)#1,166
59. Weston Lakes 2.4% 19.7% (-17.3)#59 16.9% (-14.5)#1,176
60. Chandler 2.5% 19.7% (-17.2)#60 16.9% (-14.5)#1,202
61. Cut And Shoot 2.5% 19.7% (-17.2)#61 16.9% (-14.5)#1,212
62. Palm Valley 2.5% 19.7% (-17.2)#62 16.9% (-14.4)#1,248
63. Tool 2.5% 19.7% (-17.2)#63 16.9% (-14.4)#1,254
64. Liberty Hill 2.5% 19.7% (-17.2)#64 16.9% (-14.4)#1,255
65. Lorena 2.5% 19.7% (-17.2)#65 16.9% (-14.4)#1,257
66. Justin 2.5% 19.7% (-17.1)#66 16.9% (-14.4)#1,268
67. Bee Cave 2.5% 19.7% (-17.1)#67 16.9% (-14.4)#1,273
68. Hedwig Village 2.6% 19.7% (-17.1)#68 16.9% (-14.4)#1,299
69. Corinth 2.6% 19.7% (-17.1)#69 16.9% (-14.3)#1,320
70. Murphy 2.6% 19.7% (-17.1)#70 16.9% (-14.3)#1,336
71. Hudson Oaks 2.6% 19.7% (-17.1)#71 16.9% (-14.3)#1,345
72. Burke 2.7% 19.7% (-17.0)#72 16.9% (-14.3)#1,368
73. Hico 2.7% 19.7% (-17.0)#73 16.9% (-14.3)#1,372
74. Briarcliff 2.7% 19.7% (-17.0)#74 16.9% (-14.3)#1,387
75. Melissa 2.7% 19.7% (-17.0)#75 16.9% (-14.2)#1,409
76. Alamo Heights 2.7% 19.7% (-17.0)#76 16.9% (-14.2)#1,417
77. Westlake 2.7% 19.7% (-16.9)#77 16.9% (-14.2)#1,437
78. Decatur 2.8% 19.7% (-16.9)#78 16.9% (-14.2)#1,447
79. Taft Southwest 2.9% 19.7% (-16.8)#79 16.9% (-14.1)#1,504
80. University Park 2.9% 19.7% (-16.8)#80 16.9% (-14.1)#1,534
81. Lavon 2.9% 19.7% (-16.8)#81 16.9% (-14.0)#1,551
82. Val Verde Park 2.9% 19.7% (-16.8)#82 16.9% (-14.0)#1,553
83. Roman Forest 2.9% 19.7% (-16.7)#83 16.9% (-14.0)#1,573
84. Bryson 3.0% 19.7% (-16.7)#84 16.9% (-13.9)#1,615
85. Oglesby 3.0% 19.7% (-16.7)#85 16.9% (-13.9)#1,626
86. Bloomburg 3.0% 19.7% (-16.7)#86 16.9% (-13.9)#1,628
87. Helotes 3.0% 19.7% (-16.6)#87 16.9% (-13.9)#1,636
88. Rockwall 3.1% 19.7% (-16.6)#88 16.9% (-13.9)#1,641
89. Heath 3.1% 19.7% (-16.6)#89 16.9% (-13.9)#1,651
90. Hollywood Park 3.1% 19.7% (-16.6)#90 16.9% (-13.9)#1,652
91. Reid Hope King 3.1% 19.7% (-16.6)#91 16.9% (-13.8)#1,674
92. Coppell 3.1% 19.7% (-16.6)#92 16.9% (-13.8)#1,685
93. Colleyville 3.1% 19.7% (-16.6)#93 16.9% (-13.8)#1,705
94. Lackland Afb 3.2% 19.7% (-16.5)#94 16.9% (-13.8)#1,727
95. Cisco 3.2% 19.7% (-16.5)#95 16.9% (-13.8)#1,733
96. Scurry 3.2% 19.7% (-16.5)#96 16.9% (-13.7)#1,755
97. Claude 3.3% 19.7% (-16.4)#97 16.9% (-13.7)#1,788
98. Friendswood 3.3% 19.7% (-16.4)#98 16.9% (-13.7)#1,802
99. Highland Park 3.3% 19.7% (-16.4)#99 16.9% (-13.6)#1,808
100. Oak Valley 3.3% 19.7% (-16.4)#100 16.9% (-13.6)#1,834

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas are:
#1
0.38%
#2
0.42%
#3
0.54%
#4
0.57%
#5
0.59%
#6
0.66%
#7
0.68%
#8
0.70%
#9
0.78%
#10
0.78%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas?
Trophy Club has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas with 0.38%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Texas?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Texas is 19.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.