Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Food Preparation & Serving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Ruso 100.0% 5.2% (+94.8)#1 5.3% (+94.7)#33
2. Tolley 50.0% 5.2% (+44.8)#2 5.3% (+44.7)#117
3. Hampden 45.5% 5.2% (+40.2)#3 5.3% (+40.2)#136
4. Brinsmade 44.4% 5.2% (+39.2)#4 5.3% (+39.2)#144
5. Fortuna 41.7% 5.2% (+36.4)#5 5.3% (+36.4)#170
6. Makoti 39.4% 5.2% (+34.2)#6 5.3% (+34.1)#193
7. Ruthville 39.1% 5.2% (+33.9)#7 5.3% (+33.8)#194
8. Medora 36.0% 5.2% (+30.8)#8 5.3% (+30.7)#236
9. Bathgate 36.0% 5.2% (+30.8)#9 5.3% (+30.7)#237
10. Esmond 31.0% 5.2% (+25.7)#10 5.3% (+25.7)#323
11. Bowdon 30.2% 5.2% (+25.0)#11 5.3% (+24.9)#341
12. Butte 30.0% 5.2% (+24.8)#12 5.3% (+24.7)#347
13. Fingal 29.1% 5.2% (+23.9)#13 5.3% (+23.8)#367
14. Canton City Hensel 27.3% 5.2% (+22.0)#14 5.3% (+22.0)#421
15. Spiritwood 27.3% 5.2% (+22.0)#15 5.3% (+22.0)#422
16. Bisbee 26.9% 5.2% (+21.7)#16 5.3% (+21.6)#434
17. Alamo 26.5% 5.2% (+21.2)#17 5.3% (+21.2)#448
18. Selz 24.2% 5.2% (+19.0)#18 5.3% (+18.9)#544
19. Jud 23.8% 5.2% (+18.6)#19 5.3% (+18.5)#560
20. East Dunseith 22.6% 5.2% (+17.4)#20 5.3% (+17.4)#638
21. Four Bears Village 22.5% 5.2% (+17.3)#21 5.3% (+17.2)#641
22. Stanton 21.8% 5.2% (+16.6)#22 5.3% (+16.5)#687
23. Ayr 21.4% 5.2% (+16.2)#23 5.3% (+16.1)#715
24. Clifford 20.0% 5.2% (+14.8)#24 5.3% (+14.7)#847
25. Parshall 19.1% 5.2% (+13.9)#25 5.3% (+13.8)#934
26. Edgeley 19.0% 5.2% (+13.7)#26 5.3% (+13.7)#952
27. Litchville 18.9% 5.2% (+13.6)#27 5.3% (+13.6)#962
28. Page 18.1% 5.2% (+12.9)#28 5.3% (+12.8)#1,052
29. Flaxton 17.6% 5.2% (+12.4)#29 5.3% (+12.4)#1,113
30. Englevale 17.5% 5.2% (+12.3)#30 5.3% (+12.2)#1,136
31. Carson 17.5% 5.2% (+12.3)#31 5.3% (+12.2)#1,139
32. Pick City 16.3% 5.2% (+11.0)#32 5.3% (+11.0)#1,337
33. Deering 14.3% 5.2% (+9.06)#33 5.3% (+9.00)#1,826
34. Mchenry 14.3% 5.2% (+9.06)#34 5.3% (+9.00)#1,830
35. Hamberg 14.3% 5.2% (+9.06)#35 5.3% (+9.00)#1,839
36. Elliott 13.6% 5.2% (+8.41)#36 5.3% (+8.35)#2,028
37. Egeland 13.5% 5.2% (+8.28)#37 5.3% (+8.23)#2,064
38. Granville 13.2% 5.2% (+7.96)#38 5.3% (+7.91)#2,182
39. Powers Lake 12.2% 5.2% (+6.94)#39 5.3% (+6.89)#2,663
40. Glenburn 11.7% 5.2% (+6.42)#40 5.3% (+6.36)#2,969
41. Trenton 11.4% 5.2% (+6.18)#41 5.3% (+6.12)#3,118
42. Beulah 11.3% 5.2% (+6.12)#42 5.3% (+6.06)#3,167
43. Ellendale 11.3% 5.2% (+6.05)#43 5.3% (+5.99)#3,210
44. Regent 11.0% 5.2% (+5.76)#44 5.3% (+5.70)#3,399
45. Mott 10.4% 5.2% (+5.20)#45 5.3% (+5.15)#3,776
46. Kenmare 10.4% 5.2% (+5.17)#46 5.3% (+5.11)#3,795
47. Michigan City 10.3% 5.2% (+5.10)#47 5.3% (+5.04)#3,850
48. Center 10.2% 5.2% (+5.01)#48 5.3% (+4.95)#3,906
49. Petersburg 10.2% 5.2% (+4.97)#49 5.3% (+4.92)#3,937
50. Wimbledon 10.0% 5.2% (+4.77)#50 5.3% (+4.71)#4,111
51. Voltaire 10.0% 5.2% (+4.77)#51 5.3% (+4.71)#4,125
52. Zap 9.8% 5.2% (+4.61)#52 5.3% (+4.55)#4,233
53. Streeter 9.8% 5.2% (+4.53)#53 5.3% (+4.47)#4,308
54. Abercrombie 9.4% 5.2% (+4.17)#54 5.3% (+4.12)#4,638
55. Oakes 9.2% 5.2% (+4.02)#55 5.3% (+3.96)#4,795
56. Richardton 9.2% 5.2% (+4.01)#56 5.3% (+3.96)#4,802
57. Mayville 9.2% 5.2% (+3.94)#57 5.3% (+3.88)#4,869
58. Sentinel Butte 9.1% 5.2% (+3.86)#58 5.3% (+3.80)#4,974
59. Halliday 9.0% 5.2% (+3.76)#59 5.3% (+3.70)#5,071
60. Regan 8.9% 5.2% (+3.66)#60 5.3% (+3.60)#5,213
61. Belfield 8.9% 5.2% (+3.65)#61 5.3% (+3.60)#5,224
62. Elgin 8.9% 5.2% (+3.64)#62 5.3% (+3.59)#5,230
63. St Thomas 8.8% 5.2% (+3.61)#63 5.3% (+3.56)#5,262
64. Frontier 8.8% 5.2% (+3.59)#64 5.3% (+3.54)#5,289
65. Emerado 8.7% 5.2% (+3.42)#65 5.3% (+3.37)#5,487
66. Lakota 8.5% 5.2% (+3.28)#66 5.3% (+3.22)#5,643
67. Fessenden 8.5% 5.2% (+3.26)#67 5.3% (+3.20)#5,674
68. New Rockford 8.5% 5.2% (+3.24)#68 5.3% (+3.18)#5,701
69. Fordville 8.5% 5.2% (+3.23)#69 5.3% (+3.18)#5,712
70. Glen Ullin 8.4% 5.2% (+3.17)#70 5.3% (+3.11)#5,792
71. Drake 8.3% 5.2% (+3.10)#71 5.3% (+3.05)#5,874
72. Buchanan 8.3% 5.2% (+3.10)#72 5.3% (+3.05)#5,898
73. Rolla 8.3% 5.2% (+3.05)#73 5.3% (+2.99)#5,963
74. Cooperstown 8.3% 5.2% (+3.03)#74 5.3% (+2.98)#5,982
75. Wahpeton 8.2% 5.2% (+3.01)#75 5.3% (+2.96)#6,005
76. Hatton 8.2% 5.2% (+2.95)#76 5.3% (+2.90)#6,087
77. Willow City 8.2% 5.2% (+2.93)#77 5.3% (+2.88)#6,122
78. Noonan 8.1% 5.2% (+2.83)#78 5.3% (+2.78)#6,252
79. Mandan 8.1% 5.2% (+2.83)#79 5.3% (+2.78)#6,256
80. Haynes 8.0% 5.2% (+2.77)#80 5.3% (+2.71)#6,346
81. Arthur 7.7% 5.2% (+2.51)#81 5.3% (+2.46)#6,759
82. Grenora 7.7% 5.2% (+2.51)#82 5.3% (+2.46)#6,760
83. Reeder 7.7% 5.2% (+2.46)#83 5.3% (+2.41)#6,852
84. Valley City 7.6% 5.2% (+2.41)#84 5.3% (+2.36)#6,925
85. Jamestown 7.6% 5.2% (+2.40)#85 5.3% (+2.35)#6,944
86. Lincoln 7.6% 5.2% (+2.40)#86 5.3% (+2.34)#6,949
87. St John 7.6% 5.2% (+2.39)#87 5.3% (+2.33)#6,965
88. Maxbass 7.5% 5.2% (+2.32)#88 5.3% (+2.26)#7,068
89. Aneta 7.4% 5.2% (+2.12)#89 5.3% (+2.07)#7,368
90. Riverdale 7.3% 5.2% (+2.06)#90 5.3% (+2.01)#7,457
91. Crary 7.3% 5.2% (+2.04)#91 5.3% (+1.99)#7,487
92. Almont 7.2% 5.2% (+2.02)#92 5.3% (+1.96)#7,531
93. Cayuga 7.1% 5.2% (+1.91)#93 5.3% (+1.86)#7,749
94. Bowman 7.1% 5.2% (+1.90)#94 5.3% (+1.84)#7,773
95. Underwood 7.1% 5.2% (+1.89)#95 5.3% (+1.84)#7,774
96. Colfax 7.0% 5.2% (+1.77)#96 5.3% (+1.71)#8,006
97. Portland 6.9% 5.2% (+1.68)#97 5.3% (+1.62)#8,161
98. Killdeer 6.9% 5.2% (+1.64)#98 5.3% (+1.58)#8,246
99. Hettinger 6.8% 5.2% (+1.58)#99 5.3% (+1.52)#8,393
100. Mcclusky 6.6% 5.2% (+1.40)#100 5.3% (+1.34)#8,789

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
50.0%
#3
45.5%
#4
44.4%
#5
41.7%
#6
39.4%
#7
39.1%
#8
36.0%
#9
36.0%
#10
31.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota?
Ruso has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in North Dakota is 5.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States is 5.3%.