Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 18-24
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Belterra 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#1 21.6% (+78.4)#1
2. Carrizo Springs 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#2 21.6% (+78.4)#6
3. Farmersville 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#3 21.6% (+78.4)#15
4. Holly Lake Ranch 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#4 21.6% (+78.4)#44
5. South Padre Island 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#5 21.6% (+78.4)#48
6. Van Horn 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#6 21.6% (+78.4)#64
7. Crosby 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#7 21.6% (+78.4)#67
8. Center Point 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#8 21.6% (+78.4)#78
9. Milam 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#9 21.6% (+78.4)#102
10. Fifth Street 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#10 21.6% (+78.4)#105
11. Martindale 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#11 21.6% (+78.4)#132
12. Quail Creek 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#12 21.6% (+78.4)#133
13. Sebastian 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#13 21.6% (+78.4)#136
14. Carrizo Hill 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#14 21.6% (+78.4)#142
15. Falcon Lake Estates 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#15 21.6% (+78.4)#178
16. Clint 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#16 21.6% (+78.4)#186
17. Ames 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#17 21.6% (+78.4)#194
18. Canyon Creek 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#18 21.6% (+78.4)#241
19. Wells 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#19 21.6% (+78.4)#257
20. Alto Bonito Heights 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#20 21.6% (+78.4)#269
21. La Tina Ranch 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#21 21.6% (+78.4)#270
22. La Puerta 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#22 21.6% (+78.4)#275
23. Road Runner 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#23 21.6% (+78.4)#302
24. Myrtle Springs 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#24 21.6% (+78.4)#316
25. Garza Salinas Ii 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#25 21.6% (+78.4)#376
26. Buckholts 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#26 21.6% (+78.4)#402
27. Huxley 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#27 21.6% (+78.4)#410
28. Morgan Farm 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#28 21.6% (+78.4)#432
29. Plantersville 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#29 21.6% (+78.4)#438
30. Murchison 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#30 21.6% (+78.4)#443
31. Cottonwood 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#31 21.6% (+78.4)#486
32. Iredell 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#32 21.6% (+78.4)#502
33. Blessing 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#33 21.6% (+78.4)#508
34. Barrera 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#34 21.6% (+78.4)#513
35. Byers 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#35 21.6% (+78.4)#521
36. Hilltop Cdp Starr County 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#37 21.6% (+78.4)#574
37. Gary City 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#38 21.6% (+78.4)#575
38. Havana 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#39 21.6% (+78.4)#616
39. San Carlos I 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#40 21.6% (+78.4)#631
40. South Frydek 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#41 21.6% (+78.4)#654
41. Pecan Gap 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#42 21.6% (+78.4)#691
42. Los Alvarez 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#43 21.6% (+78.4)#720
43. Navarro 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#44 21.6% (+78.4)#728
44. El Castillo 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#45 21.6% (+78.4)#785
45. Boys Ranch 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#46 21.6% (+78.4)#804
46. Richards 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#47 21.6% (+78.4)#816
47. Chula Vista Cdp Cameron County 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#48 21.6% (+78.4)#817
48. Loma Vista 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#49 21.6% (+78.4)#822
49. Browndell 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#50 21.6% (+78.4)#873
50. La Loma De Falcon 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#51 21.6% (+78.4)#944
51. Toco 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#52 21.6% (+78.4)#965
52. Quitaque 93.1% 22.6% (+70.5)#53 21.6% (+71.5)#1,031
53. Campo Verde 92.0% 22.6% (+69.4)#54 21.6% (+70.4)#1,042
54. Mccamey 88.9% 22.6% (+66.3)#55 21.6% (+67.3)#1,082
55. Big Sandy 88.5% 22.6% (+66.0)#56 21.6% (+66.9)#1,096
56. Malone 88.5% 22.6% (+65.9)#57 21.6% (+66.9)#1,099
57. Indian Lake 86.1% 22.6% (+63.5)#58 21.6% (+64.5)#1,144
58. Medina 85.4% 22.6% (+62.8)#59 21.6% (+63.8)#1,157
59. Wellington 85.1% 22.6% (+62.5)#60 21.6% (+63.5)#1,163
60. Wheeler 84.7% 22.6% (+62.2)#61 21.6% (+63.1)#1,165
61. Giddings 84.0% 22.6% (+61.4)#62 21.6% (+62.4)#1,187
62. Mcleod 83.8% 22.6% (+61.2)#63 21.6% (+62.2)#1,193
63. Post Oak Bend City 83.3% 22.6% (+60.8)#64 21.6% (+61.7)#1,200
64. East Alto Bonito 83.3% 22.6% (+60.8)#65 21.6% (+61.7)#1,202
65. Fronton 82.9% 22.6% (+60.3)#66 21.6% (+61.3)#1,222
66. Albany 82.7% 22.6% (+60.2)#67 21.6% (+61.1)#1,223
67. Omaha 82.6% 22.6% (+60.0)#68 21.6% (+61.0)#1,225
68. China 82.6% 22.6% (+60.0)#69 21.6% (+61.0)#1,226
69. Bluetown 82.6% 22.6% (+60.0)#70 21.6% (+61.0)#1,227
70. San Diego 82.4% 22.6% (+59.8)#71 21.6% (+60.8)#1,230
71. St Jo 82.4% 22.6% (+59.8)#72 21.6% (+60.8)#1,232
72. Horseshoe Bend 81.9% 22.6% (+59.4)#73 21.6% (+60.3)#1,240
73. Frost 81.8% 22.6% (+59.3)#74 21.6% (+60.2)#1,241
74. Newcastle 81.8% 22.6% (+59.3)#75 21.6% (+60.2)#1,243
75. Riviera 81.5% 22.6% (+58.9)#76 21.6% (+59.9)#1,250
76. Ivanhoe 81.2% 22.6% (+58.7)#77 21.6% (+59.7)#1,253
77. Bogata 80.8% 22.6% (+58.2)#78 21.6% (+59.2)#1,272
78. Whiteface 78.6% 22.6% (+56.0)#79 21.6% (+57.0)#1,354
79. Encantada Ranchito El Calaboz 78.2% 22.6% (+55.7)#80 21.6% (+56.6)#1,364
80. Salida Del Sol Estates 77.9% 22.6% (+55.4)#81 21.6% (+56.3)#1,369
81. Valle Vista 77.9% 22.6% (+55.3)#82 21.6% (+56.3)#1,370
82. Louise 77.7% 22.6% (+55.1)#83 21.6% (+56.1)#1,392
83. Balcones Heights 76.0% 22.6% (+53.5)#84 21.6% (+54.4)#1,435
84. Refugio 75.9% 22.6% (+53.3)#85 21.6% (+54.3)#1,440
85. Abram 75.6% 22.6% (+53.1)#86 21.6% (+54.0)#1,453
86. Amherst 75.0% 22.6% (+52.4)#87 21.6% (+53.4)#1,472
87. Sparks 74.5% 22.6% (+51.9)#88 21.6% (+52.9)#1,528
88. Runge 74.0% 22.6% (+51.4)#89 21.6% (+52.4)#1,536
89. Somerville 73.8% 22.6% (+51.2)#90 21.6% (+52.2)#1,544
90. Knollwood 73.6% 22.6% (+51.1)#91 21.6% (+52.0)#1,554
91. Caddo Mills 72.7% 22.6% (+50.2)#92 21.6% (+51.1)#1,583
92. Barstow 72.4% 22.6% (+49.9)#93 21.6% (+50.8)#1,604
93. Huntsville 72.4% 22.6% (+49.8)#94 21.6% (+50.8)#1,606
94. West Livingston 72.3% 22.6% (+49.7)#95 21.6% (+50.7)#1,614
95. Walnut Springs 70.0% 22.6% (+47.4)#96 21.6% (+48.4)#1,710
96. Rochester 69.2% 22.6% (+46.7)#97 21.6% (+47.6)#1,745
97. White Oak 69.0% 22.6% (+46.4)#98 21.6% (+47.4)#1,749
98. Jewett 68.6% 22.6% (+46.0)#99 21.6% (+47.0)#1,778
99. Rising Star 68.4% 22.6% (+45.9)#100 21.6% (+46.8)#1,785
100. Stowell 68.1% 22.6% (+45.5)#101 21.6% (+46.5)#1,802

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas?
Carrizo Springs has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the State of Texas?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Texas is 22.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States is 21.6%.