Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Loma Linda East Cdp Jim Wells County 100.0% 1.9% (+98.1)#1 0.44% (+99.6)#4
2. South Fork Estates 91.3% 1.9% (+89.5)#2 0.44% (+90.9)#12
3. Chula Vista Cdp Cameron County 79.1% 1.9% (+77.2)#3 0.44% (+78.6)#15
4. Falcon Mesa 66.7% 1.9% (+64.8)#4 0.44% (+66.2)#20
5. Realitos 59.0% 1.9% (+57.1)#5 0.44% (+58.5)#28
6. Paisano Park 52.6% 1.9% (+50.8)#6 0.44% (+52.2)#34
7. La Minita 50.5% 1.9% (+48.6)#7 0.44% (+50.0)#41
8. Waka 47.2% 1.9% (+45.4)#8 0.44% (+46.8)#47
9. Rancho Viejo 43.6% 1.9% (+41.8)#9 0.44% (+43.2)#54
10. Thorntonville 42.1% 1.9% (+40.2)#10 0.44% (+41.6)#60
11. San Juan 39.1% 1.9% (+37.3)#11 0.44% (+38.7)#68
12. New Ulm 38.8% 1.9% (+36.9)#12 0.44% (+38.3)#71
13. Brazos 38.1% 1.9% (+36.2)#13 0.44% (+37.7)#77
14. Big Lake 37.3% 1.9% (+35.5)#14 0.44% (+36.9)#80
15. Mertzon 33.3% 1.9% (+31.5)#15 0.44% (+32.9)#95
16. Pettus 31.8% 1.9% (+30.0)#16 0.44% (+31.4)#102
17. Southwest Sandhill 31.6% 1.9% (+29.8)#17 0.44% (+31.2)#104
18. Imperial 31.1% 1.9% (+29.2)#18 0.44% (+30.6)#106
19. Mi Ranchito Estate 30.0% 1.9% (+28.1)#19 0.44% (+29.6)#112
20. Sanford 30.0% 1.9% (+28.1)#20 0.44% (+29.6)#115
21. Sheridan 29.8% 1.9% (+27.9)#21 0.44% (+29.3)#119
22. Sand Springs 29.3% 1.9% (+27.4)#22 0.44% (+28.8)#123
23. Forsan 29.2% 1.9% (+27.4)#23 0.44% (+28.8)#124
24. Christoval 28.7% 1.9% (+26.9)#24 0.44% (+28.3)#128
25. Rankin 27.9% 1.9% (+26.0)#25 0.44% (+27.4)#136
26. Moran 27.9% 1.9% (+26.0)#26 0.44% (+27.4)#137
27. Hebbronville 27.4% 1.9% (+25.5)#27 0.44% (+27.0)#143
28. Mckinney Acres 26.8% 1.9% (+24.9)#28 0.44% (+26.3)#149
29. Delmita 26.3% 1.9% (+24.5)#29 0.44% (+25.9)#150
30. Rancho Banquete 26.0% 1.9% (+24.2)#30 0.44% (+25.6)#155
31. Goldsmith 25.7% 1.9% (+23.8)#31 0.44% (+25.2)#158
32. Airport Road Addition 25.6% 1.9% (+23.8)#32 0.44% (+25.2)#159
33. Eldorado 25.3% 1.9% (+23.4)#33 0.44% (+24.8)#161
34. Freer 24.8% 1.9% (+23.0)#34 0.44% (+24.4)#172
35. Mccamey 23.8% 1.9% (+22.0)#35 0.44% (+23.4)#177
36. Aspermont 23.2% 1.9% (+21.4)#36 0.44% (+22.8)#185
37. West Odessa 23.0% 1.9% (+21.2)#37 0.44% (+22.6)#187
38. Lindsay 23.0% 1.9% (+21.1)#38 0.44% (+22.5)#189
39. Perryton 22.8% 1.9% (+21.0)#39 0.44% (+22.4)#190
40. Lakeshore Gardens Hidden Acres 22.6% 1.9% (+20.8)#40 0.44% (+22.2)#193
41. Ranchitos East 22.6% 1.9% (+20.7)#41 0.44% (+22.1)#194
42. Sundown 22.6% 1.9% (+20.7)#42 0.44% (+22.1)#196
43. Rochelle 22.5% 1.9% (+20.6)#43 0.44% (+22.0)#201
44. Port Mansfield 22.2% 1.9% (+20.4)#44 0.44% (+21.8)#203
45. New London 22.1% 1.9% (+20.2)#45 0.44% (+21.6)#205
46. North San Pedro 21.9% 1.9% (+20.1)#46 0.44% (+21.5)#207
47. Lake Colorado City 21.5% 1.9% (+19.7)#47 0.44% (+21.1)#216
48. Denver City 21.4% 1.9% (+19.6)#48 0.44% (+21.0)#219
49. Big Wells 21.3% 1.9% (+19.5)#49 0.44% (+20.9)#220
50. Oilton 21.0% 1.9% (+19.1)#50 0.44% (+20.5)#226
51. Carrizo Springs 21.0% 1.9% (+19.1)#51 0.44% (+20.5)#228
52. Iraan 20.5% 1.9% (+18.7)#52 0.44% (+20.1)#234
53. Cushing 20.5% 1.9% (+18.6)#53 0.44% (+20.0)#235
54. Thornton 20.0% 1.9% (+18.1)#54 0.44% (+19.6)#244
55. Booker 19.9% 1.9% (+18.0)#55 0.44% (+19.4)#250
56. Midland 19.8% 1.9% (+18.0)#56 0.44% (+19.4)#251
57. Amargosa 19.7% 1.9% (+17.9)#57 0.44% (+19.3)#255
58. Sterling City 19.6% 1.9% (+17.7)#58 0.44% (+19.2)#257
59. Seagraves 19.2% 1.9% (+17.4)#59 0.44% (+18.8)#267
60. San Diego 18.7% 1.9% (+16.8)#60 0.44% (+18.2)#281
61. Westbrook 18.6% 1.9% (+16.8)#61 0.44% (+18.2)#283
62. Allison 18.6% 1.9% (+16.8)#62 0.44% (+18.2)#284
63. Todd Mission 18.5% 1.9% (+16.7)#63 0.44% (+18.1)#285
64. Orange Grove 18.5% 1.9% (+16.6)#64 0.44% (+18.1)#287
65. Gardendale 18.4% 1.9% (+16.5)#65 0.44% (+17.9)#289
66. Poth 18.3% 1.9% (+16.4)#66 0.44% (+17.8)#291
67. Nordheim 18.0% 1.9% (+16.1)#67 0.44% (+17.6)#298
68. Chico 18.0% 1.9% (+16.1)#68 0.44% (+17.6)#299
69. Woodsboro 17.4% 1.9% (+15.5)#69 0.44% (+16.9)#315
70. Huxley 17.3% 1.9% (+15.4)#70 0.44% (+16.8)#321
71. Mobeetie 17.2% 1.9% (+15.4)#71 0.44% (+16.8)#323
72. Mirando City 17.1% 1.9% (+15.2)#72 0.44% (+16.6)#334
73. Coahoma 17.0% 1.9% (+15.1)#73 0.44% (+16.5)#338
74. Buffalo 16.9% 1.9% (+15.1)#74 0.44% (+16.5)#340
75. Andrews 16.9% 1.9% (+15.0)#75 0.44% (+16.5)#342
76. Crane 16.9% 1.9% (+15.0)#76 0.44% (+16.4)#344
77. Siesta Shores 16.7% 1.9% (+14.9)#77 0.44% (+16.3)#345
78. Ganado 16.4% 1.9% (+14.6)#78 0.44% (+16.0)#356
79. Meadow 16.2% 1.9% (+14.4)#79 0.44% (+15.8)#361
80. Lueders 16.2% 1.9% (+14.4)#80 0.44% (+15.8)#363
81. Las Lomitas 16.1% 1.9% (+14.3)#81 0.44% (+15.7)#364
82. Yorktown 16.1% 1.9% (+14.3)#82 0.44% (+15.7)#365
83. Garrison 16.1% 1.9% (+14.2)#83 0.44% (+15.7)#367
84. Snyder 16.0% 1.9% (+14.2)#84 0.44% (+15.6)#372
85. Kermit 16.0% 1.9% (+14.2)#85 0.44% (+15.6)#374
86. Bunker Hill Village 16.0% 1.9% (+14.1)#86 0.44% (+15.6)#377
87. Pleasanton 15.7% 1.9% (+13.8)#87 0.44% (+15.2)#382
88. Bruni 15.4% 1.9% (+13.5)#88 0.44% (+14.9)#389
89. Jewett 15.4% 1.9% (+13.5)#89 0.44% (+14.9)#392
90. Elm Creek 15.2% 1.9% (+13.3)#90 0.44% (+14.8)#398
91. Dime Box 15.2% 1.9% (+13.3)#91 0.44% (+14.7)#399
92. Newcastle 14.9% 1.9% (+13.1)#92 0.44% (+14.5)#412
93. Post 14.8% 1.9% (+13.0)#93 0.44% (+14.4)#419
94. Ringgold 14.7% 1.9% (+12.9)#94 0.44% (+14.3)#428
95. Pawnee 14.6% 1.9% (+12.8)#95 0.44% (+14.2)#435
96. Stanton 14.6% 1.9% (+12.7)#96 0.44% (+14.1)#437
97. Falls City 14.3% 1.9% (+12.4)#97 0.44% (+13.8)#458
98. Canadian 14.2% 1.9% (+12.3)#98 0.44% (+13.7)#461
99. Austwell 14.0% 1.9% (+12.2)#99 0.44% (+13.6)#467
100. Shelbyville 14.0% 1.9% (+12.1)#100 0.44% (+13.5)#468

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas are:
#1
91.3%
#2
66.7%
#3
59.0%
#4
52.6%
#5
50.5%
#6
43.6%
#7
42.1%
#8
39.1%
#9
37.3%
#10
33.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas?
South Fork Estates has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas with 91.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in Texas is 1.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States is 0.44%.