Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Transportation
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Quemado 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#8
2. Burlington 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#2 3.8% (+96.2)#13
3. Carlton 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#3 3.8% (+96.2)#20
4. Hillside Acres 100.0% 4.2% (+95.8)#4 3.8% (+96.2)#23
5. Los Ebanos Cdp Starr County 58.0% 4.2% (+53.8)#5 3.8% (+54.2)#55
6. Bivins 54.5% 4.2% (+50.4)#6 3.8% (+50.7)#67
7. J F Villareal 54.3% 4.2% (+50.1)#7 3.8% (+50.4)#71
8. La Presa 54.0% 4.2% (+49.9)#8 3.8% (+50.2)#74
9. Zapata Ranch 52.4% 4.2% (+48.2)#9 3.8% (+48.6)#82
10. Neylandville 51.8% 4.2% (+47.6)#10 3.8% (+48.0)#86
11. Study Butte 48.1% 4.2% (+44.0)#11 3.8% (+44.3)#116
12. Waka 47.2% 4.2% (+43.1)#12 3.8% (+43.4)#122
13. Umbarger 46.9% 4.2% (+42.7)#13 3.8% (+43.1)#124
14. Novice 41.4% 4.2% (+37.2)#14 3.8% (+37.6)#159
15. La Paloma Lost Creek 41.0% 4.2% (+36.8)#15 3.8% (+37.2)#162
16. North Cleveland 40.8% 4.2% (+36.6)#16 3.8% (+37.0)#164
17. K Bar Ranch 39.4% 4.2% (+35.3)#17 3.8% (+35.6)#178
18. Kopperl 36.2% 4.2% (+32.0)#18 3.8% (+32.4)#220
19. Fabrica 36.2% 4.2% (+32.0)#19 3.8% (+32.3)#221
20. Redland 35.4% 4.2% (+31.2)#20 3.8% (+31.6)#235
21. Carl S Corner 35.3% 4.2% (+31.2)#21 3.8% (+31.5)#236
22. Beaver Creek 33.8% 4.2% (+29.7)#22 3.8% (+30.0)#265
23. Pablo Pena 33.8% 4.2% (+29.6)#23 3.8% (+29.9)#266
24. Falcon Mesa 33.3% 4.2% (+29.2)#24 3.8% (+29.5)#273
25. Ivanhoe 33.0% 4.2% (+28.9)#25 3.8% (+29.2)#287
26. Lelia Lake 32.3% 4.2% (+28.1)#26 3.8% (+28.4)#300
27. Sandia 32.1% 4.2% (+28.0)#27 3.8% (+28.3)#304
28. Grandfalls 30.5% 4.2% (+26.4)#28 3.8% (+26.7)#325
29. Thompsons 30.2% 4.2% (+26.1)#29 3.8% (+26.4)#334
30. Mikes 30.0% 4.2% (+25.8)#30 3.8% (+26.2)#335
31. Sanford 30.0% 4.2% (+25.8)#31 3.8% (+26.2)#337
32. Rowena 29.5% 4.2% (+25.4)#32 3.8% (+25.7)#349
33. Daisetta 29.0% 4.2% (+24.9)#33 3.8% (+25.2)#360
34. Trent 28.8% 4.2% (+24.6)#34 3.8% (+25.0)#367
35. La Paloma Addition 27.3% 4.2% (+23.1)#35 3.8% (+23.5)#407
36. Los Fresnos 25.9% 4.2% (+21.8)#36 3.8% (+22.1)#458
37. Perrin 25.4% 4.2% (+21.2)#37 3.8% (+21.5)#479
38. Higgins 25.3% 4.2% (+21.2)#38 3.8% (+21.5)#481
39. Iago 25.0% 4.2% (+20.8)#39 3.8% (+21.2)#500
40. Brackettville 24.7% 4.2% (+20.6)#40 3.8% (+20.9)#504
41. Bloomburg 24.3% 4.2% (+20.1)#41 3.8% (+20.4)#514
42. Kennard 24.2% 4.2% (+20.1)#42 3.8% (+20.4)#517
43. Camargito 24.0% 4.2% (+19.9)#43 3.8% (+20.2)#526
44. Eugenio Saenz 23.5% 4.2% (+19.4)#44 3.8% (+19.7)#548
45. Vanderbilt 23.5% 4.2% (+19.3)#45 3.8% (+19.6)#554
46. Fronton Ranchettes 23.3% 4.2% (+19.2)#46 3.8% (+19.5)#560
47. La Rosita 22.9% 4.2% (+18.7)#47 3.8% (+19.0)#593
48. Cesar Chavez 22.5% 4.2% (+18.4)#48 3.8% (+18.7)#615
49. Priddy 22.4% 4.2% (+18.3)#49 3.8% (+18.6)#622
50. Browndell 22.2% 4.2% (+18.1)#50 3.8% (+18.4)#630
51. Fort Clark Springs 22.2% 4.2% (+18.0)#51 3.8% (+18.4)#637
52. Horseshoe Bend 21.7% 4.2% (+17.5)#52 3.8% (+17.9)#663
53. Amistad 21.6% 4.2% (+17.5)#53 3.8% (+17.8)#669
54. Wyldwood 21.5% 4.2% (+17.4)#54 3.8% (+17.7)#673
55. Big Thicket Lake Estates 21.2% 4.2% (+17.0)#55 3.8% (+17.4)#702
56. Delmita 21.1% 4.2% (+16.9)#56 3.8% (+17.2)#708
57. Holiday Beach 20.9% 4.2% (+16.8)#57 3.8% (+17.1)#716
58. Sarita 20.9% 4.2% (+16.8)#58 3.8% (+17.1)#719
59. Gustine 20.9% 4.2% (+16.7)#59 3.8% (+17.1)#723
60. Fulton 20.8% 4.2% (+16.7)#60 3.8% (+17.0)#726
61. Ringgold 20.6% 4.2% (+16.4)#61 3.8% (+16.8)#748
62. Garden City 20.2% 4.2% (+16.1)#62 3.8% (+16.4)#775
63. Coyanosa 20.0% 4.2% (+15.8)#63 3.8% (+16.2)#799
64. Siesta Shores 20.0% 4.2% (+15.8)#64 3.8% (+16.1)#813
65. Rancho Banquete 19.5% 4.2% (+15.4)#65 3.8% (+15.7)#837
66. Pawnee 19.5% 4.2% (+15.4)#66 3.8% (+15.7)#838
67. Indian Springs 19.4% 4.2% (+15.3)#67 3.8% (+15.6)#845
68. China Spring 19.3% 4.2% (+15.1)#68 3.8% (+15.5)#856
69. Buffalo 19.2% 4.2% (+15.0)#69 3.8% (+15.3)#863
70. San Carlos Ii 19.1% 4.2% (+15.0)#70 3.8% (+15.3)#864
71. Dickens 19.1% 4.2% (+15.0)#71 3.8% (+15.3)#865
72. Moore Station 19.1% 4.2% (+15.0)#72 3.8% (+15.3)#866
73. Salida Del Sol Estates 18.7% 4.2% (+14.6)#73 3.8% (+14.9)#904
74. Bluetown 18.6% 4.2% (+14.4)#74 3.8% (+14.8)#918
75. Indian Lake 18.6% 4.2% (+14.4)#75 3.8% (+14.7)#922
76. Neches 18.6% 4.2% (+14.4)#76 3.8% (+14.7)#923
77. Morning Glory 18.5% 4.2% (+14.3)#77 3.8% (+14.7)#938
78. Clint 18.5% 4.2% (+14.3)#78 3.8% (+14.6)#940
79. China 18.3% 4.2% (+14.2)#79 3.8% (+14.5)#955
80. Cedar Creek 18.3% 4.2% (+14.1)#80 3.8% (+14.4)#967
81. Lopezville 18.1% 4.2% (+13.9)#81 3.8% (+14.3)#993
82. Dalhart 18.0% 4.2% (+13.8)#82 3.8% (+14.2)#1,002
83. Texline 17.7% 4.2% (+13.6)#83 3.8% (+13.9)#1,035
84. Powell 17.5% 4.2% (+13.4)#84 3.8% (+13.7)#1,057
85. Moran 17.3% 4.2% (+13.2)#85 3.8% (+13.5)#1,084
86. Dawson 17.0% 4.2% (+12.9)#86 3.8% (+13.2)#1,115
87. Lakeshore Gardens Hidden Acres 17.0% 4.2% (+12.9)#87 3.8% (+13.2)#1,116
88. Petrolia 16.9% 4.2% (+12.8)#88 3.8% (+13.1)#1,131
89. Hilltop Cdp Frio County 16.8% 4.2% (+12.7)#89 3.8% (+13.0)#1,144
90. Fort Hancock 16.8% 4.2% (+12.6)#90 3.8% (+12.9)#1,151
91. Bledsoe 16.7% 4.2% (+12.5)#91 3.8% (+12.8)#1,169
92. Grey Forest 16.6% 4.2% (+12.5)#92 3.8% (+12.8)#1,186
93. Las Quintas Fronterizas 16.5% 4.2% (+12.4)#93 3.8% (+12.7)#1,194
94. Wadsworth 16.4% 4.2% (+12.2)#94 3.8% (+12.6)#1,210
95. Perezville 16.3% 4.2% (+12.2)#95 3.8% (+12.5)#1,220
96. Wells 16.3% 4.2% (+12.1)#96 3.8% (+12.4)#1,226
97. Amherst 16.2% 4.2% (+12.0)#97 3.8% (+12.3)#1,240
98. La Blanca 16.1% 4.2% (+11.9)#98 3.8% (+12.2)#1,252
99. Windthorst 15.9% 4.2% (+11.8)#99 3.8% (+12.1)#1,266
100. Orange Grove 15.9% 4.2% (+11.8)#100 3.8% (+12.1)#1,269

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas?
Quemado has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Texas is 4.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the United States is 3.8%.