Cities with the Highest Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

State Government Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas

City % State Government Employees vs State vs National
1. Chaparrito 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#1 4.2% (+95.8)#1
2. North Escobares 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#2 4.2% (+95.8)#3
3. Gutierrez 100.0% 4.1% (+95.9)#3 4.2% (+95.8)#33
4. Box Canyon 84.2% 4.1% (+80.1)#4 4.2% (+80.0)#43
5. Salineno 79.2% 4.1% (+75.1)#5 4.2% (+74.9)#44
6. Prado Verde 67.0% 4.1% (+62.9)#6 4.2% (+62.7)#57
7. Edgewater Estates 61.9% 4.1% (+57.8)#7 4.2% (+57.7)#71
8. Riverside 58.4% 4.1% (+54.3)#8 4.2% (+54.1)#81
9. Rancho Viejo 56.4% 4.1% (+52.3)#9 4.2% (+52.1)#95
10. Evergreen 52.4% 4.1% (+48.3)#10 4.2% (+48.1)#113
11. Carlsbad 52.0% 4.1% (+47.9)#11 4.2% (+47.7)#117
12. Valentine 44.4% 4.1% (+40.3)#12 4.2% (+40.2)#171
13. Relampago 44.2% 4.1% (+40.1)#13 4.2% (+40.0)#174
14. Mcleod 42.5% 4.1% (+38.4)#14 4.2% (+38.2)#190
15. Blessing 42.3% 4.1% (+38.2)#15 4.2% (+38.1)#192
16. Normanna 40.0% 4.1% (+35.9)#16 4.2% (+35.8)#221
17. Tynan 39.8% 4.1% (+35.7)#17 4.2% (+35.5)#222
18. Loma Linda 38.8% 4.1% (+34.7)#18 4.2% (+34.6)#230
19. Mound 38.6% 4.1% (+34.5)#19 4.2% (+34.4)#231
20. Chula Vista Cdp Zavala County 36.8% 4.1% (+32.7)#20 4.2% (+32.6)#255
21. Garden City 36.4% 4.1% (+32.3)#21 4.2% (+32.1)#263
22. Benjamin 36.1% 4.1% (+32.0)#22 4.2% (+31.9)#269
23. Reklaw 35.7% 4.1% (+31.6)#23 4.2% (+31.4)#280
24. El Brazil 35.3% 4.1% (+31.2)#24 4.2% (+31.1)#287
25. Laguna Seca 33.7% 4.1% (+29.6)#25 4.2% (+29.5)#324
26. Hull 33.7% 4.1% (+29.6)#26 4.2% (+29.5)#325
27. Mount Calm 33.5% 4.1% (+29.4)#27 4.2% (+29.3)#329
28. Santa Cruz 33.3% 4.1% (+29.2)#28 4.2% (+29.1)#333
29. Butterfield 32.4% 4.1% (+28.3)#29 4.2% (+28.2)#368
30. Calvert 32.2% 4.1% (+28.1)#30 4.2% (+27.9)#375
31. Latexo 30.1% 4.1% (+26.0)#31 4.2% (+25.9)#433
32. Airport Heights 29.9% 4.1% (+25.8)#32 4.2% (+25.7)#439
33. Bonney 29.9% 4.1% (+25.8)#33 4.2% (+25.7)#440
34. Kopperl 29.8% 4.1% (+25.7)#34 4.2% (+25.5)#442
35. Mesquite 29.5% 4.1% (+25.4)#35 4.2% (+25.3)#451
36. Huntsville 29.4% 4.1% (+25.3)#36 4.2% (+25.2)#457
37. Midway 29.0% 4.1% (+24.9)#37 4.2% (+24.7)#470
38. Gail 28.9% 4.1% (+24.8)#38 4.2% (+24.7)#475
39. Grandfalls 28.8% 4.1% (+24.7)#39 4.2% (+24.6)#481
40. San Ygnacio 28.4% 4.1% (+24.3)#40 4.2% (+24.2)#503
41. Washburn 28.1% 4.1% (+24.0)#41 4.2% (+23.8)#521
42. Holly Lake Ranch 27.9% 4.1% (+23.8)#42 4.2% (+23.6)#528
43. South La Paloma 26.1% 4.1% (+22.0)#43 4.2% (+21.8)#606
44. Pyote 26.1% 4.1% (+22.0)#44 4.2% (+21.8)#608
45. Blue Berry Hill 25.9% 4.1% (+21.8)#45 4.2% (+21.7)#620
46. Elsa 25.5% 4.1% (+21.4)#46 4.2% (+21.2)#642
47. Cedar Point 25.5% 4.1% (+21.4)#47 4.2% (+21.2)#643
48. Mertens 24.5% 4.1% (+20.4)#48 4.2% (+20.2)#706
49. Deweyville 24.5% 4.1% (+20.4)#49 4.2% (+20.2)#707
50. Benjamin Perez 24.1% 4.1% (+20.0)#50 4.2% (+19.9)#730
51. Hudson 23.9% 4.1% (+19.8)#51 4.2% (+19.7)#743
52. Beauxart Gardens 23.6% 4.1% (+19.5)#52 4.2% (+19.3)#761
53. Shiro 23.5% 4.1% (+19.4)#53 4.2% (+19.3)#768
54. Thompsons 22.8% 4.1% (+18.7)#54 4.2% (+18.5)#805
55. Cranfills Gap 22.7% 4.1% (+18.6)#55 4.2% (+18.4)#815
56. Colmesneil 22.6% 4.1% (+18.5)#56 4.2% (+18.3)#822
57. Lelia Lake 22.6% 4.1% (+18.5)#57 4.2% (+18.3)#826
58. Christine 22.5% 4.1% (+18.4)#58 4.2% (+18.3)#830
59. Richards 22.0% 4.1% (+17.9)#59 4.2% (+17.7)#879
60. Bremond 21.6% 4.1% (+17.5)#60 4.2% (+17.4)#918
61. College Station 21.0% 4.1% (+16.9)#61 4.2% (+16.7)#972
62. Howardwick 20.7% 4.1% (+16.6)#62 4.2% (+16.5)#995
63. La Victoria 20.6% 4.1% (+16.5)#63 4.2% (+16.3)#1,011
64. Whitharral 20.6% 4.1% (+16.5)#64 4.2% (+16.3)#1,012
65. Thompsonville 20.4% 4.1% (+16.3)#65 4.2% (+16.2)#1,032
66. Elkhart 20.4% 4.1% (+16.3)#66 4.2% (+16.1)#1,036
67. Wortham 20.2% 4.1% (+16.1)#67 4.2% (+16.0)#1,048
68. Trinity 20.1% 4.1% (+16.0)#68 4.2% (+15.9)#1,054
69. Arroyo Colorado Estates 20.0% 4.1% (+15.9)#69 4.2% (+15.8)#1,062
70. Creedmoor 19.7% 4.1% (+15.6)#70 4.2% (+15.5)#1,106
71. Ozona 19.4% 4.1% (+15.3)#71 4.2% (+15.1)#1,135
72. Star Harbor 19.2% 4.1% (+15.1)#72 4.2% (+15.0)#1,154
73. Coolidge 19.1% 4.1% (+15.0)#73 4.2% (+14.9)#1,171
74. Dime Box 19.0% 4.1% (+14.9)#74 4.2% (+14.7)#1,187
75. Elmo 18.9% 4.1% (+14.8)#75 4.2% (+14.6)#1,199
76. Serenada 18.8% 4.1% (+14.7)#76 4.2% (+14.6)#1,202
77. Thornton 18.8% 4.1% (+14.7)#77 4.2% (+14.6)#1,203
78. Edcouch 18.3% 4.1% (+14.2)#78 4.2% (+14.1)#1,274
79. Beaver Creek 18.3% 4.1% (+14.2)#79 4.2% (+14.1)#1,276
80. Webberville 18.1% 4.1% (+14.0)#80 4.2% (+13.9)#1,309
81. Haskell 17.9% 4.1% (+13.8)#81 4.2% (+13.7)#1,336
82. Powell 17.9% 4.1% (+13.8)#82 4.2% (+13.6)#1,346
83. Palestine 17.6% 4.1% (+13.5)#83 4.2% (+13.3)#1,389
84. Rio Grande City 17.4% 4.1% (+13.3)#84 4.2% (+13.2)#1,408
85. Coahoma 17.3% 4.1% (+13.2)#85 4.2% (+13.1)#1,425
86. Plantersville 17.2% 4.1% (+13.1)#86 4.2% (+13.0)#1,441
87. Camp Wood 17.1% 4.1% (+13.0)#87 4.2% (+12.9)#1,452
88. Adrian 17.0% 4.1% (+12.9)#88 4.2% (+12.8)#1,477
89. Anson 17.0% 4.1% (+12.9)#89 4.2% (+12.8)#1,480
90. Tiki Island 17.0% 4.1% (+12.9)#90 4.2% (+12.8)#1,482
91. Rosanky 17.0% 4.1% (+12.9)#91 4.2% (+12.7)#1,488
92. Alto 17.0% 4.1% (+12.9)#92 4.2% (+12.7)#1,489
93. New Waverly 16.9% 4.1% (+12.8)#93 4.2% (+12.7)#1,491
94. Ricardo 16.9% 4.1% (+12.8)#94 4.2% (+12.6)#1,500
95. Wyldwood 16.7% 4.1% (+12.6)#95 4.2% (+12.4)#1,536
96. Mexia 16.6% 4.1% (+12.5)#96 4.2% (+12.4)#1,568
97. Las Quintas Fronterizas 16.5% 4.1% (+12.4)#97 4.2% (+12.3)#1,582
98. Commerce 16.3% 4.1% (+12.2)#98 4.2% (+12.1)#1,624
99. Groesbeck 16.3% 4.1% (+12.2)#99 4.2% (+12.0)#1,626
100. Lovelady 16.2% 4.1% (+12.1)#100 4.2% (+12.0)#1,641

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
84.2%
#5
67.0%
#6
61.9%
#7
58.4%
#8
56.4%
#9
52.4%
#10
52.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas?
Chaparrito has the Highest Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of State Government Employees in the State of Texas?
Percentage of State Government Employees in Texas is 4.1%.
What is the Percentage of State Government Employees in the United States?
Percentage of State Government Employees in the United States is 4.2%.