Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Educational Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Chaparrito 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#1 9.3% (+90.7)#2
2. North Escobares 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#2 9.3% (+90.7)#3
3. Del Mar Heights 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#3 9.3% (+90.7)#9
4. Sunset Cdp Starr County 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#5 9.3% (+90.7)#13
5. Longoria 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#6 9.3% (+90.7)#14
6. Sunset Acres 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#7 9.3% (+90.7)#26
7. La Paloma Ranchettes 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#8 9.3% (+90.7)#27
8. Santel 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#9 9.3% (+90.7)#36
9. Los Ybanez 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#10 9.3% (+90.7)#37
10. Prado Verde 92.5% 9.6% (+82.9)#11 9.3% (+83.2)#42
11. Evergreen 88.1% 9.6% (+78.5)#12 9.3% (+78.8)#43
12. Sheffield 86.4% 9.6% (+76.8)#13 9.3% (+77.0)#44
13. Box Canyon 84.2% 9.6% (+74.6)#14 9.3% (+74.9)#46
14. Salineno 79.2% 9.6% (+69.6)#15 9.3% (+69.9)#52
15. Grandfalls 64.4% 9.6% (+54.8)#16 9.3% (+55.1)#92
16. San Juan 60.9% 9.6% (+51.3)#17 9.3% (+51.6)#110
17. Ramos 60.0% 9.6% (+50.4)#18 9.3% (+50.7)#116
18. Airport Road Addition 58.5% 9.6% (+49.0)#19 9.3% (+49.2)#127
19. Fronton Ranchettes 56.7% 9.6% (+47.1)#20 9.3% (+47.4)#141
20. Rancho Viejo 56.4% 9.6% (+46.8)#21 9.3% (+47.0)#143
21. Salineno North 52.4% 9.6% (+42.8)#22 9.3% (+43.1)#180
22. Lake View 47.0% 9.6% (+37.4)#23 9.3% (+37.7)#249
23. Adrian 46.8% 9.6% (+37.2)#24 9.3% (+37.5)#253
24. Harrold 46.7% 9.6% (+37.1)#25 9.3% (+37.4)#257
25. J F Villareal 45.7% 9.6% (+36.2)#26 9.3% (+36.4)#275
26. Mcleod 45.2% 9.6% (+35.6)#27 9.3% (+35.9)#284
27. Valentine 44.4% 9.6% (+34.9)#28 9.3% (+35.1)#291
28. Richards 43.9% 9.6% (+34.3)#29 9.3% (+34.6)#306
29. Miguel Barrera 43.6% 9.6% (+34.1)#30 9.3% (+34.3)#313
30. Los Ebanos Cdp Starr County 42.0% 9.6% (+32.5)#31 9.3% (+32.7)#349
31. Deweyville 41.0% 9.6% (+31.4)#32 9.3% (+31.7)#371
32. Spring Branch 40.9% 9.6% (+31.4)#33 9.3% (+31.6)#372
33. Riverside 40.1% 9.6% (+30.5)#34 9.3% (+30.8)#389
34. Guthrie 39.7% 9.6% (+30.1)#35 9.3% (+30.4)#399
35. Santo 39.2% 9.6% (+29.7)#36 9.3% (+29.9)#411
36. Alamo Beach 39.1% 9.6% (+29.6)#37 9.3% (+29.8)#415
37. Loma Linda 38.8% 9.6% (+29.2)#38 9.3% (+29.5)#426
38. Kopperl 38.3% 9.6% (+28.7)#39 9.3% (+29.0)#441
39. Lasana 38.0% 9.6% (+28.4)#40 9.3% (+28.7)#446
40. Sanderson 37.0% 9.6% (+27.4)#41 9.3% (+27.7)#478
41. Chula Vista Cdp Zavala County 36.8% 9.6% (+27.3)#42 9.3% (+27.5)#484
42. Sandia 36.7% 9.6% (+27.1)#43 9.3% (+27.3)#494
43. Gail 36.4% 9.6% (+26.8)#44 9.3% (+27.0)#505
44. Garden City 36.4% 9.6% (+26.8)#45 9.3% (+27.0)#506
45. Dennis 36.0% 9.6% (+26.5)#46 9.3% (+26.7)#518
46. Rochelle 35.5% 9.6% (+25.9)#47 9.3% (+26.2)#538
47. El Brazil 35.3% 9.6% (+25.7)#48 9.3% (+26.0)#555
48. Wellman 35.1% 9.6% (+25.6)#49 9.3% (+25.8)#562
49. San Ygnacio 35.0% 9.6% (+25.5)#50 9.3% (+25.7)#567
50. Iglesia Antigua 34.8% 9.6% (+25.2)#51 9.3% (+25.5)#578
51. Balmorhea 34.6% 9.6% (+25.0)#52 9.3% (+25.2)#592
52. Penelope 33.7% 9.6% (+24.1)#53 9.3% (+24.3)#624
53. Douglassville 32.7% 9.6% (+23.2)#54 9.3% (+23.4)#676
54. Holly Lake Ranch 32.7% 9.6% (+23.2)#55 9.3% (+23.4)#677
55. La Joya 32.6% 9.6% (+23.0)#56 9.3% (+23.2)#685
56. Butterfield 32.4% 9.6% (+22.9)#57 9.3% (+23.1)#691
57. Whitharral 32.4% 9.6% (+22.9)#58 9.3% (+23.1)#693
58. Frost 31.2% 9.6% (+21.6)#59 9.3% (+21.9)#754
59. Loop 30.9% 9.6% (+21.3)#60 9.3% (+21.6)#773
60. Las Lomitas 29.0% 9.6% (+19.5)#61 9.3% (+19.7)#884
61. Asherton 28.9% 9.6% (+19.4)#62 9.3% (+19.6)#887
62. Happy 28.7% 9.6% (+19.2)#63 9.3% (+19.4)#906
63. Ropesville 28.6% 9.6% (+19.0)#64 9.3% (+19.3)#914
64. South Frydek 28.6% 9.6% (+19.0)#65 9.3% (+19.3)#916
65. Mount Calm 28.3% 9.6% (+18.7)#66 9.3% (+19.0)#943
66. Woodway 28.3% 9.6% (+18.7)#67 9.3% (+19.0)#948
67. Stinnett 28.2% 9.6% (+18.6)#68 9.3% (+18.9)#953
68. Laguna Seca 28.2% 9.6% (+18.6)#69 9.3% (+18.9)#956
69. Washburn 28.1% 9.6% (+18.5)#70 9.3% (+18.8)#965
70. College Station 28.1% 9.6% (+18.5)#71 9.3% (+18.8)#967
71. Blue Berry Hill 28.1% 9.6% (+18.5)#72 9.3% (+18.7)#968
72. Poetry 27.9% 9.6% (+18.3)#73 9.3% (+18.6)#981
73. Rice Tracts 27.8% 9.6% (+18.2)#74 9.3% (+18.5)#986
74. Relampago 27.6% 9.6% (+18.0)#75 9.3% (+18.2)#1,006
75. Linn 27.6% 9.6% (+18.0)#76 9.3% (+18.2)#1,007
76. Presidio 26.7% 9.6% (+17.1)#77 9.3% (+17.4)#1,081
77. Calvert 26.2% 9.6% (+16.6)#78 9.3% (+16.8)#1,130
78. Wadsworth 26.1% 9.6% (+16.5)#79 9.3% (+16.8)#1,133
79. South La Paloma 26.1% 9.6% (+16.5)#80 9.3% (+16.8)#1,135
80. Smyer 25.8% 9.6% (+16.3)#81 9.3% (+16.5)#1,158
81. Beauxart Gardens 25.8% 9.6% (+16.2)#82 9.3% (+16.5)#1,162
82. Star Harbor 25.6% 9.6% (+16.1)#83 9.3% (+16.3)#1,185
83. North Pearsall 25.3% 9.6% (+15.8)#84 9.3% (+16.0)#1,217
84. Coldspring 25.1% 9.6% (+15.5)#85 9.3% (+15.8)#1,231
85. New Home 25.0% 9.6% (+15.4)#86 9.3% (+15.7)#1,242
86. Pablo Pena 25.0% 9.6% (+15.4)#87 9.3% (+15.7)#1,244
87. Lakeshore Gardens Hidden Acres 24.9% 9.6% (+15.3)#88 9.3% (+15.5)#1,266
88. Gregory 24.8% 9.6% (+15.3)#89 9.3% (+15.5)#1,267
89. Coahoma 24.7% 9.6% (+15.1)#90 9.3% (+15.4)#1,282
90. Commerce 24.7% 9.6% (+15.1)#91 9.3% (+15.4)#1,285
91. Somerset 24.6% 9.6% (+15.0)#92 9.3% (+15.2)#1,299
92. Ozona 24.2% 9.6% (+14.6)#93 9.3% (+14.9)#1,343
93. Benjamin Perez 24.1% 9.6% (+14.6)#94 9.3% (+14.8)#1,352
94. Tradewinds 24.1% 9.6% (+14.5)#95 9.3% (+14.8)#1,355
95. Fort Clark Springs 23.9% 9.6% (+14.3)#96 9.3% (+14.6)#1,375
96. Christine 23.7% 9.6% (+14.2)#97 9.3% (+14.4)#1,408
97. Roma 23.4% 9.6% (+13.9)#98 9.3% (+14.1)#1,456
98. Progreso 23.3% 9.6% (+13.7)#99 9.3% (+13.9)#1,480
99. Monte Alto 23.3% 9.6% (+13.7)#100 9.3% (+13.9)#1,482
100. Mustang Ridge 23.2% 9.6% (+13.7)#101 9.3% (+13.9)#1,485

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
92.5%
#10
88.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas?
Chaparrito has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Texas is 9.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the United States is 9.3%.