Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Food Preparation & Serving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Hubbard 44.4% 4.7% (+39.7)#1 5.3% (+39.2)#143
2. Bruno 41.2% 4.7% (+36.4)#2 5.3% (+35.9)#178
3. Hazel Run 37.0% 4.7% (+32.3)#3 5.3% (+31.8)#219
4. Riverland 32.9% 4.7% (+28.1)#4 5.3% (+27.6)#285
5. Halma 30.8% 4.7% (+26.0)#5 5.3% (+25.5)#328
6. Pine Bend 28.6% 4.7% (+23.8)#6 5.3% (+23.3)#384
7. Kinney 28.0% 4.7% (+23.3)#7 5.3% (+22.7)#398
8. Hill City 26.0% 4.7% (+21.3)#8 5.3% (+20.7)#471
9. Kenneth 25.0% 4.7% (+20.3)#9 5.3% (+19.7)#508
10. Walker 24.3% 4.7% (+19.5)#10 5.3% (+19.0)#540
11. Spring Hill 23.4% 4.7% (+18.7)#11 5.3% (+18.2)#588
12. Henriette 23.1% 4.7% (+18.3)#12 5.3% (+17.8)#613
13. Finland 22.7% 4.7% (+18.0)#13 5.3% (+17.4)#634
14. South End 22.2% 4.7% (+17.5)#14 5.3% (+16.9)#670
15. Ebro 21.4% 4.7% (+16.7)#15 5.3% (+16.1)#714
16. Evan 20.5% 4.7% (+15.8)#16 5.3% (+15.2)#784
17. Walters 20.0% 4.7% (+15.3)#17 5.3% (+14.7)#846
18. Kelliher 19.7% 4.7% (+15.0)#18 5.3% (+14.4)#875
19. St. John's University 19.3% 4.7% (+14.6)#19 5.3% (+14.0)#913
20. Essig 18.2% 4.7% (+13.5)#20 5.3% (+12.9)#1,045
21. Pease 17.9% 4.7% (+13.2)#21 5.3% (+12.7)#1,076
22. Pine River 17.9% 4.7% (+13.2)#22 5.3% (+12.6)#1,082
23. Franklin 17.2% 4.7% (+12.5)#23 5.3% (+11.9)#1,179
24. Hilltop 17.0% 4.7% (+12.3)#24 5.3% (+11.7)#1,204
25. Odin 16.9% 4.7% (+12.2)#25 5.3% (+11.6)#1,218
26. Delhi 16.7% 4.7% (+11.9)#26 5.3% (+11.4)#1,273
27. Spring Park 16.1% 4.7% (+11.4)#27 5.3% (+10.8)#1,385
28. Iona 16.1% 4.7% (+11.3)#28 5.3% (+10.8)#1,394
29. Spicer 16.1% 4.7% (+11.3)#29 5.3% (+10.8)#1,396
30. Aldrich 15.8% 4.7% (+11.1)#30 5.3% (+10.5)#1,452
31. Heron Lake 15.7% 4.7% (+11.0)#31 5.3% (+10.4)#1,466
32. Elba 15.7% 4.7% (+11.0)#32 5.3% (+10.4)#1,475
33. Claremont 15.6% 4.7% (+10.9)#33 5.3% (+10.4)#1,483
34. Trommald 15.6% 4.7% (+10.8)#34 5.3% (+10.3)#1,499
35. St Rosa 14.8% 4.7% (+10.1)#35 5.3% (+9.53)#1,687
36. Currie 14.7% 4.7% (+9.97)#36 5.3% (+9.42)#1,710
37. White Earth 14.6% 4.7% (+9.83)#37 5.3% (+9.28)#1,750
38. Sandstone 14.5% 4.7% (+9.81)#38 5.3% (+9.25)#1,758
39. Morton 14.4% 4.7% (+9.64)#39 5.3% (+9.08)#1,801
40. Winton 14.0% 4.7% (+9.30)#40 5.3% (+8.75)#1,907
41. Backus 13.8% 4.7% (+9.11)#41 5.3% (+8.56)#1,956
42. Forada 13.8% 4.7% (+9.11)#42 5.3% (+8.56)#1,957
43. Cyrus 13.2% 4.7% (+8.49)#43 5.3% (+7.93)#2,170
44. Steen 13.2% 4.7% (+8.48)#44 5.3% (+7.92)#2,179
45. Menahga 13.1% 4.7% (+8.33)#45 5.3% (+7.78)#2,229
46. Roosevelt 12.9% 4.7% (+8.14)#46 5.3% (+7.59)#2,313
47. Motley 12.7% 4.7% (+7.98)#47 5.3% (+7.42)#2,398
48. Underwood 12.7% 4.7% (+7.95)#48 5.3% (+7.40)#2,413
49. Ghent 12.5% 4.7% (+7.77)#49 5.3% (+7.21)#2,492
50. Sargeant 12.5% 4.7% (+7.77)#50 5.3% (+7.21)#2,520
51. Vineland 12.4% 4.7% (+7.69)#51 5.3% (+7.14)#2,551
52. Elkton 12.3% 4.7% (+7.60)#52 5.3% (+7.04)#2,592
53. Clements 12.3% 4.7% (+7.55)#53 5.3% (+6.99)#2,606
54. Foxhome 12.3% 4.7% (+7.55)#54 5.3% (+6.99)#2,607
55. Lancaster 12.3% 4.7% (+7.54)#55 5.3% (+6.98)#2,610
56. Morris 12.2% 4.7% (+7.48)#56 5.3% (+6.92)#2,642
57. West Union 12.2% 4.7% (+7.46)#57 5.3% (+6.91)#2,653
58. Gonvick 12.1% 4.7% (+7.39)#58 5.3% (+6.84)#2,691
59. Mcgregor 12.0% 4.7% (+7.31)#59 5.3% (+6.76)#2,732
60. Jasper 12.0% 4.7% (+7.28)#60 5.3% (+6.73)#2,749
61. Crown College 12.0% 4.7% (+7.28)#61 5.3% (+6.73)#2,750
62. Big Falls 11.8% 4.7% (+7.11)#62 5.3% (+6.56)#2,856
63. Watson 11.8% 4.7% (+7.10)#63 5.3% (+6.54)#2,866
64. Remer 11.8% 4.7% (+7.03)#64 5.3% (+6.48)#2,890
65. Bena 11.8% 4.7% (+7.03)#65 5.3% (+6.48)#2,897
66. Crosby 11.8% 4.7% (+7.02)#66 5.3% (+6.47)#2,907
67. Graceville 11.7% 4.7% (+6.97)#67 5.3% (+6.41)#2,945
68. Porter 11.7% 4.7% (+6.92)#68 5.3% (+6.36)#2,972
69. Deerwood 11.6% 4.7% (+6.92)#69 5.3% (+6.36)#2,976
70. Naytahwaush 11.4% 4.7% (+6.70)#70 5.3% (+6.14)#3,104
71. Tamarack 11.4% 4.7% (+6.70)#71 5.3% (+6.14)#3,109
72. Pipestone 11.4% 4.7% (+6.65)#72 5.3% (+6.10)#3,138
73. New Trier 11.4% 4.7% (+6.63)#73 5.3% (+6.08)#3,156
74. Homer 11.1% 4.7% (+6.38)#74 5.3% (+5.83)#3,322
75. Rutledge 11.0% 4.7% (+6.27)#75 5.3% (+5.71)#3,393
76. Virginia 11.0% 4.7% (+6.24)#76 5.3% (+5.69)#3,409
77. Freeborn 10.9% 4.7% (+6.19)#77 5.3% (+5.64)#3,430
78. Karlstad 10.9% 4.7% (+6.16)#78 5.3% (+5.61)#3,447
79. Eitzen 10.9% 4.7% (+6.12)#79 5.3% (+5.57)#3,480
80. Ironton 10.8% 4.7% (+6.09)#80 5.3% (+5.54)#3,498
81. Park Rapids 10.7% 4.7% (+5.99)#81 5.3% (+5.44)#3,563
82. Elmdale 10.7% 4.7% (+5.98)#82 5.3% (+5.43)#3,574
83. Cosmos 10.6% 4.7% (+5.89)#83 5.3% (+5.34)#3,640
84. Willow River 10.6% 4.7% (+5.86)#84 5.3% (+5.30)#3,659
85. Okabena 10.6% 4.7% (+5.86)#85 5.3% (+5.30)#3,660
86. Ormsby 10.5% 4.7% (+5.79)#86 5.3% (+5.24)#3,703
87. Bemidji 10.5% 4.7% (+5.79)#87 5.3% (+5.23)#3,713
88. Deer River 10.5% 4.7% (+5.78)#88 5.3% (+5.22)#3,719
89. Landfall 10.5% 4.7% (+5.77)#89 5.3% (+5.21)#3,729
90. Calumet 10.3% 4.7% (+5.58)#90 5.3% (+5.02)#3,859
91. Hammond 10.2% 4.7% (+5.50)#91 5.3% (+4.94)#3,917
92. Onamia 10.2% 4.7% (+5.47)#92 5.3% (+4.92)#3,932
93. Hoffman 10.2% 4.7% (+5.44)#93 5.3% (+4.88)#3,969
94. New Auburn 10.2% 4.7% (+5.42)#94 5.3% (+4.87)#3,979
95. Audubon 10.1% 4.7% (+5.35)#95 5.3% (+4.79)#4,033
96. Canton 10.0% 4.7% (+5.31)#96 5.3% (+4.76)#4,064
97. Murdock 10.0% 4.7% (+5.27)#97 5.3% (+4.71)#4,103
98. Arco 10.0% 4.7% (+5.27)#98 5.3% (+4.71)#4,121
99. Taopi 10.0% 4.7% (+5.27)#99 5.3% (+4.71)#4,124
100. New Prague 9.9% 4.7% (+5.20)#100 5.3% (+4.64)#4,169

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota are:
#1
41.2%
#2
37.0%
#3
32.9%
#4
30.8%
#5
28.6%
#6
28.0%
#7
26.0%
#8
25.0%
#9
24.3%
#10
23.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota?
Bruno has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota with 41.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Minnesota is 4.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States is 5.3%.