Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Transportation & Warehousing
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Quemado 100.0% 5.5% (+94.5)#1 4.9% (+95.1)#11
2. Burlington 100.0% 5.5% (+94.5)#2 4.9% (+95.1)#19
3. Carlton 100.0% 5.5% (+94.5)#3 4.9% (+95.1)#27
4. Hillside Acres 100.0% 5.5% (+94.5)#4 4.9% (+95.1)#29
5. Rangerville 69.8% 5.5% (+64.3)#5 4.9% (+64.9)#49
6. Brazos 61.9% 5.5% (+56.4)#6 4.9% (+57.0)#66
7. Los Ebanos Cdp Starr County 58.0% 5.5% (+52.5)#7 4.9% (+53.0)#77
8. La Paloma Addition 58.0% 5.5% (+52.5)#8 4.9% (+53.0)#78
9. Valentine 55.6% 5.5% (+50.1)#9 4.9% (+50.6)#86
10. Port Mansfield 55.6% 5.5% (+50.1)#10 4.9% (+50.6)#87
11. Bivins 54.5% 5.5% (+49.0)#11 4.9% (+49.6)#92
12. J F Villareal 54.3% 5.5% (+48.8)#12 4.9% (+49.3)#95
13. La Presa 54.0% 5.5% (+48.5)#13 4.9% (+49.1)#97
14. Villa Verde 53.8% 5.5% (+48.3)#14 4.9% (+48.9)#98
15. Zapata Ranch 52.4% 5.5% (+46.9)#15 4.9% (+47.4)#105
16. Colorado Acres 50.0% 5.5% (+44.5)#16 4.9% (+45.1)#117
17. Study Butte 48.1% 5.5% (+42.6)#17 4.9% (+43.2)#136
18. Umbarger 46.9% 5.5% (+41.4)#18 4.9% (+41.9)#150
19. Dell City 46.4% 5.5% (+40.9)#19 4.9% (+41.5)#154
20. Putnam 45.5% 5.5% (+40.0)#20 4.9% (+40.5)#160
21. Praesel 41.9% 5.5% (+36.4)#21 4.9% (+37.0)#182
22. La Paloma Lost Creek 41.0% 5.5% (+35.5)#22 4.9% (+36.0)#189
23. Coyanosa 40.0% 5.5% (+34.5)#23 4.9% (+35.1)#192
24. K Bar Ranch 39.4% 5.5% (+33.9)#24 4.9% (+34.5)#198
25. Neches 39.2% 5.5% (+33.7)#25 4.9% (+34.2)#200
26. Novice 37.9% 5.5% (+32.4)#26 4.9% (+33.0)#208
27. Fabrica 36.2% 5.5% (+30.7)#27 4.9% (+31.2)#239
28. Ivanhoe 35.0% 5.5% (+29.5)#28 4.9% (+30.1)#263
29. Carl S Corner 34.0% 5.5% (+28.5)#29 4.9% (+29.1)#280
30. Falcon Mesa 33.3% 5.5% (+27.8)#30 4.9% (+28.4)#296
31. St Paul 32.5% 5.5% (+27.0)#31 4.9% (+27.5)#323
32. Lelia Lake 32.3% 5.5% (+26.8)#32 4.9% (+27.3)#328
33. North Cleveland 30.3% 5.5% (+24.8)#33 4.9% (+25.3)#357
34. Ranchitos Las Lomas 29.7% 5.5% (+24.2)#34 4.9% (+24.8)#371
35. Higgins 28.6% 5.5% (+23.1)#35 4.9% (+23.6)#401
36. Mingus 28.6% 5.5% (+23.1)#36 4.9% (+23.6)#402
37. Ranchos Penitas West 28.0% 5.5% (+22.5)#37 4.9% (+23.1)#422
38. Allison 27.9% 5.5% (+22.4)#38 4.9% (+23.0)#430
39. Waskom 27.9% 5.5% (+22.4)#39 4.9% (+22.9)#431
40. Brackettville 26.9% 5.5% (+21.4)#40 4.9% (+22.0)#467
41. Beaver Creek 25.6% 5.5% (+20.1)#41 4.9% (+20.6)#509
42. Fort Hancock 25.4% 5.5% (+19.9)#42 4.9% (+20.5)#521
43. Mikes 25.3% 5.5% (+19.8)#43 4.9% (+20.3)#528
44. Iago 25.0% 5.5% (+19.5)#44 4.9% (+20.1)#556
45. Argyle 23.8% 5.5% (+18.3)#45 4.9% (+18.9)#596
46. Eugenio Saenz 23.5% 5.5% (+18.0)#46 4.9% (+18.6)#603
47. Blackwell 23.5% 5.5% (+18.0)#47 4.9% (+18.6)#604
48. Wallis 23.4% 5.5% (+17.9)#48 4.9% (+18.4)#610
49. Lopezville 23.3% 5.5% (+17.8)#49 4.9% (+18.4)#611
50. Santo 23.2% 5.5% (+17.7)#50 4.9% (+18.3)#619
51. Thompsonville 23.1% 5.5% (+17.6)#51 4.9% (+18.2)#623
52. La Rosita 22.9% 5.5% (+17.4)#52 4.9% (+17.9)#639
53. Thompsons 22.8% 5.5% (+17.3)#53 4.9% (+17.9)#643
54. Priddy 22.4% 5.5% (+16.9)#54 4.9% (+17.5)#665
55. Elm Creek 22.3% 5.5% (+16.8)#55 4.9% (+17.3)#670
56. Browndell 22.2% 5.5% (+16.7)#56 4.9% (+17.3)#674
57. Salida Del Sol Estates 22.0% 5.5% (+16.5)#57 4.9% (+17.1)#685
58. Gustine 22.0% 5.5% (+16.5)#58 4.9% (+17.0)#688
59. Boling 22.0% 5.5% (+16.5)#59 4.9% (+17.0)#689
60. Horseshoe Bend 21.7% 5.5% (+16.2)#60 4.9% (+16.7)#711
61. Amistad 21.6% 5.5% (+16.1)#61 4.9% (+16.7)#716
62. Muniz 21.5% 5.5% (+16.0)#62 4.9% (+16.5)#719
63. Big Thicket Lake Estates 21.2% 5.5% (+15.7)#63 4.9% (+16.2)#742
64. Rosita 21.2% 5.5% (+15.7)#64 4.9% (+16.2)#745
65. Powell 21.1% 5.5% (+15.6)#65 4.9% (+16.1)#756
66. Holiday Beach 20.9% 5.5% (+15.4)#66 4.9% (+16.0)#762
67. Sarita 20.9% 5.5% (+15.4)#67 4.9% (+16.0)#765
68. Bledsoe 20.8% 5.5% (+15.3)#68 4.9% (+15.9)#769
69. Marlin 20.8% 5.5% (+15.3)#69 4.9% (+15.8)#774
70. Beckville 20.4% 5.5% (+14.9)#70 4.9% (+15.5)#802
71. Sanford 20.0% 5.5% (+14.5)#71 4.9% (+15.1)#830
72. Pawnee 19.5% 5.5% (+14.0)#72 4.9% (+14.6)#872
73. Reno City Parker And Tarrant Counties 19.3% 5.5% (+13.8)#73 4.9% (+14.3)#879
74. Leming 19.2% 5.5% (+13.7)#74 4.9% (+14.3)#893
75. Fort Davis 19.2% 5.5% (+13.7)#75 4.9% (+14.2)#894
76. San Carlos Ii 19.1% 5.5% (+13.6)#76 4.9% (+14.2)#895
77. Garrett 18.9% 5.5% (+13.4)#77 4.9% (+14.0)#914
78. Morning Glory 18.5% 5.5% (+13.0)#78 4.9% (+13.5)#963
79. Petrolia 18.5% 5.5% (+13.0)#79 4.9% (+13.5)#964
80. Ozona 18.1% 5.5% (+12.6)#80 4.9% (+13.2)#1,004
81. Amherst 18.1% 5.5% (+12.6)#81 4.9% (+13.1)#1,011
82. El Chaparral 18.0% 5.5% (+12.5)#82 4.9% (+13.0)#1,025
83. Clyde 17.9% 5.5% (+12.4)#83 4.9% (+13.0)#1,032
84. Vanderbilt 17.9% 5.5% (+12.4)#84 4.9% (+12.9)#1,040
85. Pecan Acres 17.8% 5.5% (+12.3)#85 4.9% (+12.9)#1,047
86. Kurten 17.7% 5.5% (+12.2)#86 4.9% (+12.8)#1,059
87. Indian Lake 17.6% 5.5% (+12.1)#87 4.9% (+12.6)#1,080
88. Wells 17.5% 5.5% (+12.0)#88 4.9% (+12.6)#1,092
89. Moran 17.3% 5.5% (+11.8)#89 4.9% (+12.4)#1,116
90. Winona 17.1% 5.5% (+11.6)#90 4.9% (+12.2)#1,147
91. Southwest Sandhill 17.0% 5.5% (+11.5)#91 4.9% (+12.1)#1,152
92. Hale Center 17.0% 5.5% (+11.5)#92 4.9% (+12.0)#1,164
93. Benavides 16.9% 5.5% (+11.4)#93 4.9% (+11.9)#1,187
94. Sand Springs 16.8% 5.5% (+11.3)#94 4.9% (+11.9)#1,196
95. Cesar Chavez 16.6% 5.5% (+11.1)#95 4.9% (+11.7)#1,242
96. Iowa Park 16.6% 5.5% (+11.1)#96 4.9% (+11.6)#1,249
97. Las Quintas Fronterizas 16.5% 5.5% (+11.0)#97 4.9% (+11.6)#1,253
98. Dawson 16.4% 5.5% (+10.9)#98 4.9% (+11.5)#1,277
99. Ames 16.2% 5.5% (+10.7)#99 4.9% (+11.2)#1,314
100. Wyldwood 16.2% 5.5% (+10.7)#100 4.9% (+11.2)#1,317

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas?
Quemado has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Texas is 5.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in the United States is 4.9%.