Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas

15.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Coppell 1.5% 35.8% (-34.3)#1 33.1% (-31.6)#19
2. Hudson 1.9% 35.8% (-33.9)#2 33.1% (-31.2)#31
3. Kirby 3.2% 35.8% (-32.6)#3 33.1% (-29.9)#104
4. Sugar Land 3.6% 35.8% (-32.2)#4 33.1% (-29.6)#142
5. Ponder 3.8% 35.8% (-32.0)#5 33.1% (-29.4)#157
6. Katy 4.3% 35.8% (-31.5)#6 33.1% (-28.8)#202
7. Fresno 4.4% 35.8% (-31.4)#7 33.1% (-28.8)#210
8. Vidor 4.4% 35.8% (-31.4)#8 33.1% (-28.7)#215
9. Heath 4.4% 35.8% (-31.4)#9 33.1% (-28.7)#216
10. Rockport 4.5% 35.8% (-31.2)#10 33.1% (-28.6)#227
11. Follett 4.5% 35.8% (-31.2)#11 33.1% (-28.6)#233
12. Danbury 4.8% 35.8% (-31.0)#12 33.1% (-28.4)#257
13. Scotland 4.8% 35.8% (-31.0)#13 33.1% (-28.4)#261
14. Wallis 5.0% 35.8% (-30.8)#14 33.1% (-28.1)#290
15. Selma 5.0% 35.8% (-30.7)#15 33.1% (-28.1)#303
16. Robinson 5.1% 35.8% (-30.7)#16 33.1% (-28.1)#304
17. Helotes 5.1% 35.8% (-30.7)#17 33.1% (-28.1)#306
18. Clarendon 5.1% 35.8% (-30.7)#18 33.1% (-28.0)#311
19. Von Ormy 5.4% 35.8% (-30.4)#19 33.1% (-27.7)#350
20. Bronte 5.4% 35.8% (-30.4)#20 33.1% (-27.7)#351
21. Port Neches 5.4% 35.8% (-30.4)#21 33.1% (-27.7)#356
22. Corinth 5.5% 35.8% (-30.3)#22 33.1% (-27.6)#362
23. Lake Dallas 5.6% 35.8% (-30.2)#23 33.1% (-27.5)#378
24. Slaton 5.7% 35.8% (-30.1)#24 33.1% (-27.5)#387
25. Lakeside Town Tarrant County 5.7% 35.8% (-30.1)#25 33.1% (-27.4)#401
26. Pearland 5.8% 35.8% (-29.9)#26 33.1% (-27.3)#413
27. Gunter 6.1% 35.8% (-29.7)#27 33.1% (-27.0)#452
28. Rosita 6.2% 35.8% (-29.6)#28 33.1% (-27.0)#459
29. Addison 6.3% 35.8% (-29.4)#29 33.1% (-26.8)#489
30. Hempstead 6.4% 35.8% (-29.4)#30 33.1% (-26.7)#499
31. Prosper 6.4% 35.8% (-29.4)#31 33.1% (-26.7)#502
32. Lockney 6.5% 35.8% (-29.3)#32 33.1% (-26.7)#507
33. Briarcliff 6.7% 35.8% (-29.1)#33 33.1% (-26.5)#536
34. Alpine 6.7% 35.8% (-29.1)#34 33.1% (-26.4)#555
35. Bridge City 6.8% 35.8% (-29.0)#35 33.1% (-26.4)#565
36. Decatur 6.8% 35.8% (-29.0)#36 33.1% (-26.4)#566
37. Godley 6.9% 35.8% (-28.9)#37 33.1% (-26.2)#580
38. Trophy Club 7.1% 35.8% (-28.7)#38 33.1% (-26.0)#602
39. Wylie 7.1% 35.8% (-28.7)#39 33.1% (-26.0)#603
40. Spur 7.1% 35.8% (-28.7)#40 33.1% (-26.0)#618
41. Mildred 7.1% 35.8% (-28.7)#41 33.1% (-26.0)#632
42. Saginaw 7.2% 35.8% (-28.6)#42 33.1% (-25.9)#637
43. Luling 7.4% 35.8% (-28.4)#43 33.1% (-25.8)#664
44. Thrall 7.4% 35.8% (-28.4)#44 33.1% (-25.7)#674
45. Lake Worth 7.5% 35.8% (-28.3)#45 33.1% (-25.6)#688
46. Hackberry 7.8% 35.8% (-28.0)#46 33.1% (-25.4)#745
47. Frisco 7.9% 35.8% (-27.9)#47 33.1% (-25.3)#760
48. Fair Oaks Ranch 7.9% 35.8% (-27.9)#48 33.1% (-25.3)#762
49. Sienna 8.0% 35.8% (-27.8)#49 33.1% (-25.2)#771
50. Steiner Ranch 8.4% 35.8% (-27.4)#50 33.1% (-24.7)#872
51. Sam Rayburn 8.5% 35.8% (-27.3)#51 33.1% (-24.7)#880
52. Bardwell 8.5% 35.8% (-27.3)#52 33.1% (-24.6)#885
53. Patton Village 8.6% 35.8% (-27.2)#53 33.1% (-24.6)#893
54. Flower Mound 8.6% 35.8% (-27.2)#54 33.1% (-24.5)#897
55. Grandview 8.9% 35.8% (-26.9)#55 33.1% (-24.2)#972
56. Huxley 9.1% 35.8% (-26.7)#56 33.1% (-24.0)#1,012
57. Glenn Heights 9.2% 35.8% (-26.6)#57 33.1% (-24.0)#1,022
58. Whitewright 9.2% 35.8% (-26.6)#58 33.1% (-23.9)#1,031
59. Hubbard 9.5% 35.8% (-26.3)#59 33.1% (-23.7)#1,060
60. Canton 9.5% 35.8% (-26.3)#60 33.1% (-23.6)#1,066
61. Snyder 9.6% 35.8% (-26.2)#61 33.1% (-23.6)#1,086
62. Muleshoe 9.6% 35.8% (-26.2)#62 33.1% (-23.5)#1,098
63. Highland Park 9.7% 35.8% (-26.1)#63 33.1% (-23.4)#1,113
64. Goldthwaite 10.0% 35.8% (-25.8)#64 33.1% (-23.1)#1,166
65. Alma 10.0% 35.8% (-25.8)#65 33.1% (-23.1)#1,187
66. Crandall 10.1% 35.8% (-25.7)#66 33.1% (-23.0)#1,213
67. Calvert 10.1% 35.8% (-25.6)#67 33.1% (-23.0)#1,214
68. Leonard 10.3% 35.8% (-25.5)#68 33.1% (-22.8)#1,240
69. Lackland Afb 10.3% 35.8% (-25.5)#69 33.1% (-22.8)#1,248
70. Lakeway 10.5% 35.8% (-25.3)#70 33.1% (-22.6)#1,274
71. Pettus 10.5% 35.8% (-25.3)#71 33.1% (-22.6)#1,286
72. Forney 10.9% 35.8% (-24.9)#72 33.1% (-22.2)#1,363
73. White Oak 11.0% 35.8% (-24.8)#73 33.1% (-22.2)#1,375
74. Leon Valley 11.1% 35.8% (-24.7)#74 33.1% (-22.1)#1,390
75. Brushy Creek 11.1% 35.8% (-24.7)#75 33.1% (-22.1)#1,392
76. Smithville 11.1% 35.8% (-24.7)#76 33.1% (-22.0)#1,399
77. Lake Bridgeport 11.1% 35.8% (-24.7)#77 33.1% (-22.0)#1,445
78. New Braunfels 11.3% 35.8% (-24.5)#78 33.1% (-21.9)#1,470
79. Haskell 11.4% 35.8% (-24.4)#79 33.1% (-21.7)#1,493
80. Beverly Hills 11.5% 35.8% (-24.3)#80 33.1% (-21.6)#1,509
81. Grapeland 11.6% 35.8% (-24.2)#81 33.1% (-21.5)#1,531
82. Springtown 11.7% 35.8% (-24.1)#82 33.1% (-21.5)#1,539
83. Cisco 11.7% 35.8% (-24.1)#83 33.1% (-21.4)#1,544
84. Kempner 11.8% 35.8% (-24.0)#84 33.1% (-21.4)#1,559
85. Kyle 11.8% 35.8% (-24.0)#85 33.1% (-21.3)#1,580
86. Aurora 12.0% 35.8% (-23.8)#86 33.1% (-21.1)#1,621
87. Tioga 12.0% 35.8% (-23.8)#87 33.1% (-21.1)#1,628
88. Timberwood Park 12.0% 35.8% (-23.7)#88 33.1% (-21.1)#1,633
89. University Park 12.1% 35.8% (-23.7)#89 33.1% (-21.0)#1,652
90. Clifton 12.3% 35.8% (-23.5)#90 33.1% (-20.9)#1,677
91. Natalia 12.3% 35.8% (-23.5)#91 33.1% (-20.9)#1,679
92. Brady 12.4% 35.8% (-23.4)#92 33.1% (-20.7)#1,704
93. Groesbeck 12.5% 35.8% (-23.3)#93 33.1% (-20.7)#1,711
94. Glen Rose 12.5% 35.8% (-23.3)#94 33.1% (-20.6)#1,721
95. Tomball 12.6% 35.8% (-23.2)#95 33.1% (-20.5)#1,783
96. Reid Hope King 12.8% 35.8% (-23.0)#96 33.1% (-20.4)#1,807
97. Royse City 12.8% 35.8% (-23.0)#97 33.1% (-20.3)#1,821
98. Fate 12.9% 35.8% (-22.9)#98 33.1% (-20.2)#1,843
99. Farwell 13.0% 35.8% (-22.8)#99 33.1% (-20.1)#1,869
100. Ladonia 13.1% 35.8% (-22.7)#100 33.1% (-20.0)#1,884

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas are:
#1
1.5%
#2
1.9%
#3
3.2%
#4
3.6%
#5
3.8%
#6
4.3%
#7
4.4%
#8
4.4%
#9
4.4%
#10
4.5%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas?
Coppell has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas with 1.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Texas?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Texas is 35.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.