Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Food Preparation & Serving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Clayton 43.8% 5.1% (+38.6)#1 5.3% (+38.5)#153
2. Loveland 38.5% 5.1% (+33.3)#2 5.3% (+33.2)#204
3. Buck Grove 35.0% 5.1% (+29.9)#3 5.3% (+29.7)#254
4. Burchinal 33.3% 5.1% (+28.2)#4 5.3% (+28.0)#281
5. Bentley 31.6% 5.1% (+26.5)#5 5.3% (+26.3)#304
6. Hansell 28.3% 5.1% (+23.2)#6 5.3% (+23.0)#391
7. Anthon 23.8% 5.1% (+18.7)#7 5.3% (+18.5)#562
8. Dana 23.5% 5.1% (+18.4)#8 5.3% (+18.2)#581
9. Millerton 22.7% 5.1% (+17.6)#9 5.3% (+17.4)#635
10. Wever 22.2% 5.1% (+17.1)#10 5.3% (+16.9)#662
11. Toronto 22.2% 5.1% (+17.1)#11 5.3% (+16.9)#666
12. Scarville 21.9% 5.1% (+16.8)#12 5.3% (+16.6)#685
13. Valeria 21.1% 5.1% (+15.9)#13 5.3% (+15.8)#733
14. Kamrar 20.2% 5.1% (+15.1)#14 5.3% (+15.0)#812
15. Hillsboro 20.0% 5.1% (+14.9)#15 5.3% (+14.7)#843
16. Morley 20.0% 5.1% (+14.9)#16 5.3% (+14.7)#848
17. Delphos 20.0% 5.1% (+14.9)#17 5.3% (+14.7)#853
18. Jolley 20.0% 5.1% (+14.9)#18 5.3% (+14.7)#854
19. Greenville 19.4% 5.1% (+14.3)#19 5.3% (+14.2)#901
20. Waucoma 19.2% 5.1% (+14.1)#20 5.3% (+13.9)#930
21. St Donatus 18.9% 5.1% (+13.8)#21 5.3% (+13.6)#955
22. Irvington 18.2% 5.1% (+13.1)#22 5.3% (+12.9)#1,047
23. Andrew 18.0% 5.1% (+12.9)#23 5.3% (+12.7)#1,072
24. Numa 17.6% 5.1% (+12.5)#24 5.3% (+12.4)#1,110
25. Grant 17.4% 5.1% (+12.3)#25 5.3% (+12.1)#1,157
26. Arion 16.7% 5.1% (+11.6)#26 5.3% (+11.4)#1,260
27. Vining 16.7% 5.1% (+11.6)#27 5.3% (+11.4)#1,265
28. Mona 16.7% 5.1% (+11.6)#28 5.3% (+11.4)#1,275
29. Atalissa 16.4% 5.1% (+11.3)#29 5.3% (+11.2)#1,306
30. Keosauqua 16.3% 5.1% (+11.2)#30 5.3% (+11.0)#1,330
31. Jackson Junction 15.8% 5.1% (+10.7)#31 5.3% (+10.5)#1,453
32. Hastings 15.1% 5.1% (+9.98)#32 5.3% (+9.81)#1,605
33. Mooar 14.9% 5.1% (+9.82)#33 5.3% (+9.65)#1,658
34. Davis City 14.9% 5.1% (+9.74)#34 5.3% (+9.57)#1,675
35. Garrison 14.8% 5.1% (+9.65)#35 5.3% (+9.48)#1,695
36. Webster 14.5% 5.1% (+9.40)#36 5.3% (+9.23)#1,766
37. Larrabee 14.5% 5.1% (+9.34)#37 5.3% (+9.17)#1,779
38. Bussey 14.1% 5.1% (+8.95)#38 5.3% (+8.78)#1,898
39. Superior 14.0% 5.1% (+8.92)#39 5.3% (+8.75)#1,905
40. Beaverdale 13.4% 5.1% (+8.30)#40 5.3% (+8.13)#2,094
41. Auburn 13.2% 5.1% (+8.07)#41 5.3% (+7.90)#2,192
42. Ralston 12.9% 5.1% (+7.79)#42 5.3% (+7.62)#2,298
43. Swan 12.9% 5.1% (+7.79)#43 5.3% (+7.62)#2,299
44. Percival 12.8% 5.1% (+7.71)#44 5.3% (+7.53)#2,340
45. Dedham 12.8% 5.1% (+7.67)#45 5.3% (+7.50)#2,354
46. Crystal Lake 12.5% 5.1% (+7.39)#46 5.3% (+7.21)#2,496
47. Harper 12.5% 5.1% (+7.39)#47 5.3% (+7.21)#2,505
48. Thornburg 12.5% 5.1% (+7.39)#48 5.3% (+7.21)#2,513
49. Curlew 12.5% 5.1% (+7.39)#49 5.3% (+7.21)#2,519
50. Cotter 12.5% 5.1% (+7.39)#50 5.3% (+7.21)#2,525
51. Rowley 12.4% 5.1% (+7.26)#51 5.3% (+7.09)#2,574
52. Rippey 12.2% 5.1% (+7.13)#52 5.3% (+6.96)#2,621
53. Bernard 12.2% 5.1% (+7.13)#53 5.3% (+6.96)#2,622
54. Andover 12.2% 5.1% (+7.08)#54 5.3% (+6.91)#2,651
55. Masonville 12.2% 5.1% (+7.08)#55 5.3% (+6.91)#2,654
56. Aurora 12.1% 5.1% (+7.01)#56 5.3% (+6.84)#2,690
57. Ainsworth 12.0% 5.1% (+6.91)#57 5.3% (+6.73)#2,748
58. New Albin 12.0% 5.1% (+6.84)#58 5.3% (+6.67)#2,790
59. Barnum 11.9% 5.1% (+6.83)#59 5.3% (+6.65)#2,801
60. Ladora 11.9% 5.1% (+6.83)#60 5.3% (+6.65)#2,803
61. Tabor 11.8% 5.1% (+6.71)#61 5.3% (+6.54)#2,863
62. Little Sioux 11.8% 5.1% (+6.65)#62 5.3% (+6.48)#2,895
63. Hartwick 11.8% 5.1% (+6.65)#63 5.3% (+6.48)#2,898
64. Rutland 11.7% 5.1% (+6.57)#64 5.3% (+6.40)#2,955
65. Batavia 11.6% 5.1% (+6.50)#65 5.3% (+6.32)#2,998
66. Morning Sun 11.6% 5.1% (+6.47)#66 5.3% (+6.30)#3,017
67. Melrose 11.5% 5.1% (+6.42)#67 5.3% (+6.25)#3,051
68. Grinnell 11.5% 5.1% (+6.36)#68 5.3% (+6.19)#3,081
69. Bouton 11.4% 5.1% (+6.31)#69 5.3% (+6.14)#3,107
70. Osterdock 11.4% 5.1% (+6.31)#70 5.3% (+6.14)#3,108
71. Colwell 11.4% 5.1% (+6.31)#71 5.3% (+6.14)#3,110
72. Cedar Falls 11.4% 5.1% (+6.29)#72 5.3% (+6.12)#3,121
73. Unionville 11.3% 5.1% (+6.21)#73 5.3% (+6.03)#3,184
74. Spillville 11.3% 5.1% (+6.20)#74 5.3% (+6.02)#3,194
75. Stratford 11.1% 5.1% (+6.00)#75 5.3% (+5.83)#3,306
76. Portsmouth 11.1% 5.1% (+6.00)#76 5.3% (+5.83)#3,319
77. Onawa 11.0% 5.1% (+5.88)#77 5.3% (+5.71)#3,396
78. Lu Verne 10.9% 5.1% (+5.76)#78 5.3% (+5.58)#3,465
79. California Junction 10.9% 5.1% (+5.76)#79 5.3% (+5.58)#3,472
80. Rock Rapids 10.8% 5.1% (+5.66)#80 5.3% (+5.49)#3,526
81. Deloit 10.8% 5.1% (+5.64)#81 5.3% (+5.47)#3,548
82. Carpenter 10.7% 5.1% (+5.60)#82 5.3% (+5.43)#3,577
83. Balltown 10.7% 5.1% (+5.60)#83 5.3% (+5.43)#3,580
84. Northwood 10.6% 5.1% (+5.46)#84 5.3% (+5.28)#3,674
85. Cambridge 10.4% 5.1% (+5.32)#85 5.3% (+5.15)#3,773
86. Mount Vernon 10.4% 5.1% (+5.25)#86 5.3% (+5.08)#3,822
87. Marquette 10.3% 5.1% (+5.15)#87 5.3% (+4.98)#3,883
88. Lamoni 10.2% 5.1% (+5.13)#88 5.3% (+4.95)#3,907
89. Mystic 10.2% 5.1% (+5.11)#89 5.3% (+4.93)#3,924
90. Henderson 10.1% 5.1% (+5.03)#90 5.3% (+4.86)#3,984
91. Logan 10.0% 5.1% (+4.90)#91 5.3% (+4.73)#4,090
92. Oto 10.0% 5.1% (+4.89)#92 5.3% (+4.71)#4,117
93. Welton 9.9% 5.1% (+4.76)#93 5.3% (+4.59)#4,205
94. Decorah 9.9% 5.1% (+4.75)#94 5.3% (+4.57)#4,217
95. Remsen 9.8% 5.1% (+4.71)#95 5.3% (+4.54)#4,248
96. Lambs Grove 9.7% 5.1% (+4.56)#96 5.3% (+4.39)#4,373
97. Lake City 9.6% 5.1% (+4.53)#97 5.3% (+4.36)#4,397
98. Seymour 9.6% 5.1% (+4.51)#98 5.3% (+4.34)#4,418
99. Gilmore City 9.6% 5.1% (+4.49)#99 5.3% (+4.32)#4,438
100. Sabula 9.6% 5.1% (+4.49)#100 5.3% (+4.32)#4,439

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa are:
#1
43.8%
#2
38.5%
#3
35.0%
#4
33.3%
#5
31.6%
#6
28.3%
#7
23.8%
#8
23.5%
#9
22.7%
#10
22.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa?
Clayton has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa with 43.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in Iowa is 5.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Food Preparation & Serving in the United States is 5.3%.