Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 18-24
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Clemson University 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#1 21.6% (+78.4)#4
2. Kingstree 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#2 21.6% (+78.4)#18
3. Graniteville 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#3 21.6% (+78.4)#46
4. Tigerville 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#4 21.6% (+78.4)#60
5. Catawba 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#5 21.6% (+78.4)#116
6. Beech Island 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#6 21.6% (+78.4)#123
7. La France 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#7 21.6% (+78.4)#192
8. Dovesville 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#8 21.6% (+78.4)#208
9. Unity 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#9 21.6% (+78.4)#312
10. Chickasaw Point 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#10 21.6% (+78.4)#325
11. Adams Run 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#11 21.6% (+78.4)#420
12. Donalds 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#12 21.6% (+78.4)#482
13. Atlantic Beach 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#13 21.6% (+78.4)#512
14. Perry 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#14 21.6% (+78.4)#556
15. Daviston 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#15 21.6% (+78.4)#618
16. Ulmer 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#16 21.6% (+78.4)#863
17. Jenkinsville 100.0% 24.1% (+75.9)#17 21.6% (+78.4)#938
18. Allendale 93.8% 24.1% (+69.8)#18 21.6% (+72.2)#1,019
19. St Stephen 91.4% 24.1% (+67.3)#19 21.6% (+69.8)#1,047
20. Seabrook 89.8% 24.1% (+65.7)#20 21.6% (+68.2)#1,072
21. Brookdale 84.1% 24.1% (+60.1)#21 21.6% (+62.5)#1,182
22. Springfield 81.8% 24.1% (+57.8)#22 21.6% (+60.2)#1,244
23. Hopkins 81.7% 24.1% (+57.6)#23 21.6% (+60.1)#1,249
24. Blackville 80.2% 24.1% (+56.1)#24 21.6% (+58.6)#1,283
25. Holly Hill 80.0% 24.1% (+55.9)#25 21.6% (+58.4)#1,289
26. Lowndesville 80.0% 24.1% (+55.9)#26 21.6% (+58.4)#1,308
27. Olympia 79.3% 24.1% (+55.2)#27 21.6% (+57.7)#1,319
28. Walhalla 78.4% 24.1% (+54.3)#28 21.6% (+56.8)#1,362
29. Hodges 75.9% 24.1% (+51.8)#29 21.6% (+54.3)#1,443
30. Dillon 75.0% 24.1% (+50.9)#30 21.6% (+53.4)#1,461
31. Enoree 75.0% 24.1% (+50.9)#31 21.6% (+53.4)#1,491
32. Williston 74.8% 24.1% (+50.7)#32 21.6% (+53.2)#1,524
33. Arthurtown 72.6% 24.1% (+48.6)#33 21.6% (+51.0)#1,595
34. St George 71.0% 24.1% (+46.9)#34 21.6% (+49.4)#1,667
35. Southern Shops 70.0% 24.1% (+45.9)#35 21.6% (+48.4)#1,703
36. Clemson 68.6% 24.1% (+44.5)#36 21.6% (+47.0)#1,774
37. Pinewood 68.6% 24.1% (+44.5)#37 21.6% (+47.0)#1,777
38. Great Falls 67.1% 24.1% (+43.0)#38 21.6% (+45.5)#1,844
39. Mcclellanville 66.7% 24.1% (+42.6)#39 21.6% (+45.1)#1,876
40. Reevesville 66.7% 24.1% (+42.6)#40 21.6% (+45.1)#1,916
41. Lodge 66.7% 24.1% (+42.6)#41 21.6% (+45.1)#1,935
42. Drayton 66.4% 24.1% (+42.4)#42 21.6% (+44.8)#1,956
43. New Ellenton 65.7% 24.1% (+41.6)#43 21.6% (+44.1)#1,974
44. Stateburg 65.2% 24.1% (+41.2)#44 21.6% (+43.6)#1,991
45. Lowrys 64.7% 24.1% (+40.6)#45 21.6% (+43.1)#2,017
46. Piedmont 64.5% 24.1% (+40.5)#46 21.6% (+42.9)#2,026
47. Kiawah Island 63.6% 24.1% (+39.6)#47 21.6% (+42.0)#2,071
48. Bonneau 63.2% 24.1% (+39.1)#48 21.6% (+41.6)#2,107
49. Hartsville 62.8% 24.1% (+38.8)#49 21.6% (+41.2)#2,123
50. Burnettown 62.7% 24.1% (+38.7)#50 21.6% (+41.1)#2,129
51. Winnsboro Mills 62.6% 24.1% (+38.5)#51 21.6% (+41.0)#2,133
52. Irwin 62.5% 24.1% (+38.4)#52 21.6% (+40.9)#2,143
53. Aynor 62.5% 24.1% (+38.4)#53 21.6% (+40.9)#2,145
54. Hilda 62.5% 24.1% (+38.4)#54 21.6% (+40.9)#2,153
55. Ridgeway 62.5% 24.1% (+38.4)#55 21.6% (+40.9)#2,164
56. Red Hill 61.8% 24.1% (+37.7)#56 21.6% (+40.2)#2,205
57. Woodruff 61.0% 24.1% (+36.9)#57 21.6% (+39.4)#2,259
58. Central 60.4% 24.1% (+36.3)#58 21.6% (+38.8)#2,294
59. Richburg 59.1% 24.1% (+35.0)#59 21.6% (+37.5)#2,398
60. Coward 58.1% 24.1% (+34.0)#60 21.6% (+36.5)#2,481
61. Lancaster 57.5% 24.1% (+33.4)#61 21.6% (+35.9)#2,523
62. Brunson 57.1% 24.1% (+33.1)#62 21.6% (+35.5)#2,560
63. Columbia 55.5% 24.1% (+31.4)#63 21.6% (+33.9)#2,706
64. Chesnee 53.8% 24.1% (+29.8)#64 21.6% (+32.2)#2,829
65. Valley Falls 53.6% 24.1% (+29.6)#65 21.6% (+32.0)#2,863
66. Hamer 53.6% 24.1% (+29.5)#66 21.6% (+32.0)#2,868
67. Ware Shoals 52.7% 24.1% (+28.7)#67 21.6% (+31.1)#2,960
68. Bamberg 52.5% 24.1% (+28.4)#68 21.6% (+30.9)#2,980
69. Loris 52.4% 24.1% (+28.4)#69 21.6% (+30.8)#2,986
70. Cayce 51.6% 24.1% (+27.6)#70 21.6% (+30.0)#3,057
71. Judson 51.3% 24.1% (+27.2)#71 21.6% (+29.7)#3,084
72. Mcbee 50.9% 24.1% (+26.8)#72 21.6% (+29.3)#3,112
73. Pendleton 50.6% 24.1% (+26.5)#73 21.6% (+29.0)#3,131
74. Estill 50.5% 24.1% (+26.5)#74 21.6% (+29.0)#3,132
75. North Myrtle Beach 50.5% 24.1% (+26.4)#75 21.6% (+28.9)#3,135
76. Orangeburg 50.3% 24.1% (+26.3)#76 21.6% (+28.8)#3,140
77. Watts Mills 50.0% 24.1% (+25.9)#77 21.6% (+28.4)#3,155
78. Nichols 50.0% 24.1% (+25.9)#78 21.6% (+28.4)#3,321
79. Charleston 49.9% 24.1% (+25.8)#79 21.6% (+28.3)#3,353
80. Murrells Inlet 49.7% 24.1% (+25.6)#80 21.6% (+28.1)#3,362
81. Camp Croft 49.5% 24.1% (+25.4)#81 21.6% (+27.9)#3,370
82. Fairfax 49.2% 24.1% (+25.1)#82 21.6% (+27.6)#3,386
83. Darlington 48.7% 24.1% (+24.6)#83 21.6% (+27.1)#3,417
84. Lakewood 48.4% 24.1% (+24.3)#84 21.6% (+26.8)#3,447
85. Ridge Spring 48.1% 24.1% (+24.1)#85 21.6% (+26.6)#3,477
86. Barnwell 48.0% 24.1% (+23.9)#86 21.6% (+26.4)#3,497
87. Conestee 47.0% 24.1% (+22.9)#87 21.6% (+25.4)#3,601
88. Mullins 46.6% 24.1% (+22.6)#88 21.6% (+25.0)#3,641
89. Harleyville 46.2% 24.1% (+22.1)#89 21.6% (+24.6)#3,696
90. Manning 45.9% 24.1% (+21.8)#90 21.6% (+24.3)#3,735
91. Berea 45.8% 24.1% (+21.7)#91 21.6% (+24.2)#3,748
92. Arial 44.7% 24.1% (+20.7)#92 21.6% (+23.1)#3,889
93. Gayle Mill 43.6% 24.1% (+19.6)#93 21.6% (+22.0)#4,012
94. Branchville 43.3% 24.1% (+19.2)#94 21.6% (+21.7)#4,047
95. Gantt 43.1% 24.1% (+19.1)#95 21.6% (+21.5)#4,065
96. West Columbia 42.2% 24.1% (+18.1)#96 21.6% (+20.6)#4,200
97. Ben Avon 42.0% 24.1% (+18.0)#97 21.6% (+20.4)#4,234
98. Anderson 41.4% 24.1% (+17.3)#98 21.6% (+19.8)#4,347
99. Marion 41.4% 24.1% (+17.3)#99 21.6% (+19.8)#4,348
100. Williamston 41.1% 24.1% (+17.1)#100 21.6% (+19.5)#4,379

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
93.8%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina?
Kingstree has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the State of South Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in South Carolina is 24.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States is 21.6%.