Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Manufacturing
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Panola 100.0% 14.2% (+85.8)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#25
2. Standing Rock 100.0% 14.2% (+85.8)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#38
3. Carlton 100.0% 14.2% (+85.8)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#42
4. Gainesville 79.8% 14.2% (+65.6)#4 10.0% (+69.8)#95
5. Dozier 78.1% 14.2% (+63.9)#5 10.0% (+68.1)#103
6. Natural Bridge 73.3% 14.2% (+59.1)#6 10.0% (+63.3)#118
7. Graham 67.9% 14.2% (+53.7)#7 10.0% (+57.9)#143
8. Gu Win 67.6% 14.2% (+53.4)#8 10.0% (+57.6)#145
9. Fairford 64.6% 14.2% (+50.4)#9 10.0% (+54.7)#160
10. Bristow Cove 63.6% 14.2% (+49.4)#10 10.0% (+53.6)#168
11. Gantt 63.4% 14.2% (+49.2)#11 10.0% (+53.4)#172
12. Weogufka 62.6% 14.2% (+48.4)#12 10.0% (+52.6)#178
13. Mosses 56.4% 14.2% (+42.2)#13 10.0% (+46.5)#251
14. Uriah 55.6% 14.2% (+41.4)#14 10.0% (+45.6)#262
15. Penton 55.6% 14.2% (+41.4)#15 10.0% (+45.6)#264
16. Fredonia 54.2% 14.2% (+40.0)#16 10.0% (+44.2)#292
17. Beaverton 54.2% 14.2% (+40.0)#17 10.0% (+44.2)#293
18. Pine Ridge 50.5% 14.2% (+36.3)#18 10.0% (+40.5)#366
19. Morrison Crossroads 49.5% 14.2% (+35.3)#19 10.0% (+39.5)#415
20. Fruithurst 48.9% 14.2% (+34.7)#20 10.0% (+38.9)#424
21. Chunchula 48.7% 14.2% (+34.5)#21 10.0% (+38.7)#428
22. Vina 48.3% 14.2% (+34.1)#22 10.0% (+38.3)#438
23. Union Springs 48.1% 14.2% (+33.8)#23 10.0% (+38.1)#445
24. Goodwater 47.5% 14.2% (+33.3)#24 10.0% (+37.5)#462
25. Red Bay 47.3% 14.2% (+33.1)#25 10.0% (+37.3)#472
26. Providence 46.3% 14.2% (+32.1)#26 10.0% (+36.3)#504
27. West Point 46.0% 14.2% (+31.8)#27 10.0% (+36.0)#518
28. Fayette 45.0% 14.2% (+30.8)#28 10.0% (+35.0)#553
29. Epes 44.7% 14.2% (+30.5)#29 10.0% (+34.7)#560
30. County Line 44.7% 14.2% (+30.5)#30 10.0% (+34.7)#563
31. Collinsville 44.3% 14.2% (+30.1)#31 10.0% (+34.3)#588
32. Bear Creek 44.2% 14.2% (+30.0)#32 10.0% (+34.2)#593
33. Midway 43.1% 14.2% (+28.9)#33 10.0% (+33.1)#648
34. Five Points 42.9% 14.2% (+28.7)#34 10.0% (+32.9)#660
35. Orrville 42.9% 14.2% (+28.7)#35 10.0% (+32.9)#661
36. Repton 40.8% 14.2% (+26.6)#36 10.0% (+30.8)#777
37. Hollywood 40.7% 14.2% (+26.5)#37 10.0% (+30.7)#786
38. Spruce Pine 40.6% 14.2% (+26.4)#38 10.0% (+30.6)#792
39. Akron 39.9% 14.2% (+25.7)#39 10.0% (+29.9)#851
40. Black 39.5% 14.2% (+25.3)#40 10.0% (+29.5)#867
41. Louisville 39.1% 14.2% (+24.8)#41 10.0% (+29.1)#898
42. North Courtland 38.6% 14.2% (+24.4)#42 10.0% (+28.6)#933
43. Ashland 38.4% 14.2% (+24.2)#43 10.0% (+28.5)#947
44. Sulligent 38.3% 14.2% (+24.1)#44 10.0% (+28.4)#955
45. White Plains 38.0% 14.2% (+23.8)#45 10.0% (+28.0)#980
46. Valley 37.9% 14.2% (+23.7)#46 10.0% (+27.9)#995
47. Coffeeville 37.8% 14.2% (+23.6)#47 10.0% (+27.8)#1,000
48. Cottondale 37.3% 14.2% (+23.1)#48 10.0% (+27.3)#1,035
49. Autaugaville 37.0% 14.2% (+22.8)#49 10.0% (+27.0)#1,063
50. Russellville 36.8% 14.2% (+22.6)#50 10.0% (+26.8)#1,081
51. Clayton 36.5% 14.2% (+22.2)#51 10.0% (+26.5)#1,111
52. Kennedy 36.1% 14.2% (+21.9)#52 10.0% (+26.1)#1,153
53. Rockford 36.1% 14.2% (+21.9)#53 10.0% (+26.1)#1,154
54. Town Creek 36.0% 14.2% (+21.8)#54 10.0% (+26.0)#1,165
55. Deer Park 35.7% 14.2% (+21.5)#55 10.0% (+25.7)#1,202
56. Banks 35.5% 14.2% (+21.3)#56 10.0% (+25.5)#1,223
57. Courtland 35.2% 14.2% (+21.0)#57 10.0% (+25.2)#1,265
58. Eutaw 34.9% 14.2% (+20.7)#58 10.0% (+24.9)#1,292
59. Fyffe 34.7% 14.2% (+20.5)#59 10.0% (+24.8)#1,318
60. Carolina 33.9% 14.2% (+19.7)#60 10.0% (+23.9)#1,435
61. Shelby 33.5% 14.2% (+19.3)#61 10.0% (+23.5)#1,479
62. Susan Moore 33.2% 14.2% (+19.0)#62 10.0% (+23.2)#1,532
63. Blountsville 33.1% 14.2% (+18.9)#63 10.0% (+23.1)#1,545
64. Vernon 32.9% 14.2% (+18.7)#64 10.0% (+22.9)#1,576
65. Berry 32.7% 14.2% (+18.5)#65 10.0% (+22.7)#1,599
66. Ballplay 32.6% 14.2% (+18.4)#66 10.0% (+22.6)#1,605
67. Roanoke 32.3% 14.2% (+18.1)#67 10.0% (+22.3)#1,650
68. Section 32.1% 14.2% (+17.9)#68 10.0% (+22.1)#1,672
69. Ider 31.7% 14.2% (+17.5)#69 10.0% (+21.7)#1,739
70. Vredenburgh 31.6% 14.2% (+17.4)#70 10.0% (+21.6)#1,774
71. Stewartville 31.5% 14.2% (+17.3)#71 10.0% (+21.6)#1,782
72. Cherokee 31.5% 14.2% (+17.3)#72 10.0% (+21.6)#1,783
73. Bakerhill 31.5% 14.2% (+17.3)#73 10.0% (+21.5)#1,787
74. Luverne 31.5% 14.2% (+17.3)#74 10.0% (+21.5)#1,791
75. Greenville 31.3% 14.2% (+17.1)#75 10.0% (+21.3)#1,823
76. Hollins 30.9% 14.2% (+16.7)#76 10.0% (+20.9)#1,889
77. Reform 30.6% 14.2% (+16.4)#77 10.0% (+20.6)#1,951
78. Mount Olive Cdp Coosa County 30.6% 14.2% (+16.4)#78 10.0% (+20.6)#1,953
79. Hammondville 30.5% 14.2% (+16.3)#79 10.0% (+20.5)#1,982
80. Twin 30.5% 14.2% (+16.3)#80 10.0% (+20.5)#1,988
81. Detroit 30.4% 14.2% (+16.2)#81 10.0% (+20.4)#1,992
82. Pollard 30.4% 14.2% (+16.2)#82 10.0% (+20.4)#1,995
83. Aliceville 30.1% 14.2% (+15.9)#83 10.0% (+20.1)#2,056
84. Double Springs 30.0% 14.2% (+15.8)#84 10.0% (+20.0)#2,067
85. Glenwood 30.0% 14.2% (+15.8)#85 10.0% (+20.0)#2,072
86. Benton 29.4% 14.2% (+15.2)#86 10.0% (+19.4)#2,192
87. Excel 29.3% 14.2% (+15.1)#87 10.0% (+19.3)#2,208
88. Ragland 29.3% 14.2% (+15.1)#88 10.0% (+19.3)#2,215
89. Vance 29.2% 14.2% (+15.0)#89 10.0% (+19.2)#2,236
90. Paint Rock 29.2% 14.2% (+15.0)#90 10.0% (+19.2)#2,242
91. Petrey 29.0% 14.2% (+14.8)#91 10.0% (+19.0)#2,276
92. Skyline 28.9% 14.2% (+14.7)#92 10.0% (+18.9)#2,307
93. Shorter 28.8% 14.2% (+14.6)#93 10.0% (+18.8)#2,343
94. Carlisle Rockledge 28.7% 14.2% (+14.5)#94 10.0% (+18.7)#2,352
95. Lanett 28.5% 14.2% (+14.3)#95 10.0% (+18.5)#2,412
96. Hobson 28.4% 14.2% (+14.2)#96 10.0% (+18.4)#2,435
97. Clio 28.4% 14.2% (+14.2)#97 10.0% (+18.4)#2,438
98. Triana 28.4% 14.2% (+14.2)#98 10.0% (+18.4)#2,440
99. Douglas 28.3% 14.2% (+14.1)#99 10.0% (+18.3)#2,469
100. Pleasant Groves 28.2% 14.2% (+14.0)#100 10.0% (+18.2)#2,491

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
79.8%
#5
78.1%
#6
73.3%
#7
67.9%
#8
67.6%
#9
64.6%
#10
63.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama?
Panola has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Alabama is 14.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the United States is 10.0%.