Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Manufacturing
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Rochester 100.0% 14.9% (+85.1)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#44
2. Hayfield 100.0% 14.9% (+85.1)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#60
3. Mona 83.3% 14.9% (+68.5)#3 10.0% (+73.3)#86
4. Harris 79.2% 14.9% (+64.4)#4 10.0% (+69.2)#97
5. Stone City 78.2% 14.9% (+63.3)#5 10.0% (+68.2)#102
6. Montpelier 76.8% 14.9% (+62.0)#6 10.0% (+66.8)#107
7. Chillicothe 73.3% 14.9% (+58.5)#7 10.0% (+63.3)#116
8. Yarmouth 72.7% 14.9% (+57.9)#8 10.0% (+62.7)#120
9. Little Cedar 61.5% 14.9% (+46.7)#9 10.0% (+51.5)#187
10. Big Rock 60.0% 14.9% (+45.1)#10 10.0% (+50.0)#207
11. Moscow 57.7% 14.9% (+42.9)#11 10.0% (+47.7)#227
12. Bassett 57.1% 14.9% (+42.3)#12 10.0% (+47.2)#238
13. Rodman 53.8% 14.9% (+39.0)#13 10.0% (+43.9)#306
14. Toeterville 53.3% 14.9% (+38.5)#14 10.0% (+43.3)#316
15. Promise City 51.7% 14.9% (+36.9)#15 10.0% (+41.7)#346
16. Truesdale 50.0% 14.9% (+35.1)#16 10.0% (+40.0)#378
17. Center Junction 50.0% 14.9% (+35.1)#17 10.0% (+40.0)#379
18. Hamilton 50.0% 14.9% (+35.1)#18 10.0% (+40.0)#383
19. Elkport 50.0% 14.9% (+35.1)#19 10.0% (+40.0)#400
20. Spragueville 48.7% 14.9% (+33.9)#20 10.0% (+38.7)#429
21. Stanley 48.6% 14.9% (+33.8)#21 10.0% (+38.7)#431
22. Conesville 47.5% 14.9% (+32.6)#22 10.0% (+37.5)#465
23. Craig 46.3% 14.9% (+31.5)#23 10.0% (+36.4)#501
24. Arthur 46.2% 14.9% (+31.3)#24 10.0% (+36.2)#508
25. Rembrandt 44.3% 14.9% (+29.5)#25 10.0% (+34.3)#583
26. Northboro 44.1% 14.9% (+29.2)#26 10.0% (+34.1)#601
27. Columbus Junction 44.0% 14.9% (+29.1)#27 10.0% (+34.0)#604
28. Woden 43.9% 14.9% (+29.0)#28 10.0% (+33.9)#605
29. Braddyville 43.9% 14.9% (+29.0)#29 10.0% (+33.9)#606
30. Leland 43.5% 14.9% (+28.7)#30 10.0% (+33.5)#630
31. Westfield 43.5% 14.9% (+28.6)#31 10.0% (+33.5)#632
32. Rathbun 42.9% 14.9% (+28.0)#32 10.0% (+32.9)#663
33. Udell 42.9% 14.9% (+28.0)#33 10.0% (+32.9)#664
34. Hardy 42.9% 14.9% (+28.0)#34 10.0% (+32.9)#666
35. Royal 41.9% 14.9% (+27.1)#35 10.0% (+31.9)#706
36. West Liberty 41.5% 14.9% (+26.7)#36 10.0% (+31.5)#736
37. Storm Lake 41.5% 14.9% (+26.6)#37 10.0% (+31.5)#737
38. Gillett Grove 41.2% 14.9% (+26.3)#38 10.0% (+31.2)#749
39. Hopkinton 40.8% 14.9% (+25.9)#39 10.0% (+30.8)#779
40. Paton 40.0% 14.9% (+25.1)#40 10.0% (+30.0)#833
41. Garber 40.0% 14.9% (+25.1)#41 10.0% (+30.0)#836
42. Kingston 40.0% 14.9% (+25.1)#42 10.0% (+30.0)#843
43. Chelsea 39.4% 14.9% (+24.5)#43 10.0% (+29.4)#877
44. Malcom 39.2% 14.9% (+24.3)#44 10.0% (+29.2)#890
45. Bonaparte 38.8% 14.9% (+23.9)#45 10.0% (+28.8)#913
46. Ionia 38.2% 14.9% (+23.3)#46 10.0% (+28.2)#968
47. Swaledale 37.7% 14.9% (+22.9)#47 10.0% (+27.7)#1,007
48. Carpenter 37.5% 14.9% (+22.6)#48 10.0% (+27.5)#1,019
49. Thornburg 37.5% 14.9% (+22.6)#49 10.0% (+27.5)#1,021
50. Augusta 37.0% 14.9% (+22.2)#50 10.0% (+27.0)#1,060
51. Lakeside 36.6% 14.9% (+21.8)#51 10.0% (+26.7)#1,097
52. Masonville 36.6% 14.9% (+21.7)#52 10.0% (+26.6)#1,104
53. Laurens 36.3% 14.9% (+21.4)#53 10.0% (+26.3)#1,137
54. Clarinda 36.0% 14.9% (+21.2)#54 10.0% (+26.0)#1,162
55. New Hampton 35.9% 14.9% (+21.1)#55 10.0% (+26.0)#1,171
56. Grandview 35.7% 14.9% (+20.9)#56 10.0% (+25.7)#1,199
57. Ralston 35.5% 14.9% (+20.6)#57 10.0% (+25.5)#1,230
58. Hospers 35.4% 14.9% (+20.5)#58 10.0% (+25.4)#1,244
59. Montour 35.2% 14.9% (+20.4)#59 10.0% (+25.3)#1,263
60. Chatsworth 35.1% 14.9% (+20.3)#60 10.0% (+25.1)#1,276
61. Mystic 35.0% 14.9% (+20.2)#61 10.0% (+25.0)#1,281
62. Marble Rock 34.8% 14.9% (+20.0)#62 10.0% (+24.8)#1,305
63. Janesville 34.8% 14.9% (+19.9)#63 10.0% (+24.8)#1,306
64. Monmouth 34.8% 14.9% (+19.9)#64 10.0% (+24.8)#1,309
65. Zwingle 34.8% 14.9% (+19.9)#65 10.0% (+24.8)#1,311
66. Elma 34.7% 14.9% (+19.9)#66 10.0% (+24.7)#1,319
67. Crystal Lake 34.6% 14.9% (+19.7)#67 10.0% (+24.6)#1,340
68. Drakesville 34.4% 14.9% (+19.5)#68 10.0% (+24.4)#1,362
69. Searsboro 34.3% 14.9% (+19.5)#69 10.0% (+24.3)#1,371
70. Goodell 34.0% 14.9% (+19.2)#70 10.0% (+24.0)#1,417
71. Letts 33.3% 14.9% (+18.5)#71 10.0% (+23.3)#1,494
72. Superior 33.3% 14.9% (+18.5)#72 10.0% (+23.3)#1,503
73. Beaver 33.3% 14.9% (+18.5)#73 10.0% (+23.3)#1,513
74. Muscatine 33.3% 14.9% (+18.4)#74 10.0% (+23.3)#1,529
75. Earlville 33.2% 14.9% (+18.3)#75 10.0% (+23.2)#1,537
76. Titonka 33.0% 14.9% (+18.2)#76 10.0% (+23.1)#1,553
77. Alvord 33.0% 14.9% (+18.2)#77 10.0% (+23.1)#1,554
78. Latimer 32.9% 14.9% (+18.1)#78 10.0% (+23.0)#1,564
79. Lenox 32.5% 14.9% (+17.7)#79 10.0% (+22.5)#1,618
80. Plano 32.1% 14.9% (+17.3)#80 10.0% (+22.2)#1,670
81. Rome 31.9% 14.9% (+17.1)#81 10.0% (+21.9)#1,712
82. Brunsville 31.9% 14.9% (+17.0)#82 10.0% (+21.9)#1,717
83. Clare 31.9% 14.9% (+17.0)#83 10.0% (+21.9)#1,718
84. Shambaugh 31.7% 14.9% (+16.9)#84 10.0% (+21.7)#1,747
85. Thurman 31.6% 14.9% (+16.8)#85 10.0% (+21.7)#1,759
86. Delaware 31.6% 14.9% (+16.8)#86 10.0% (+21.7)#1,760
87. Nichols 31.6% 14.9% (+16.8)#87 10.0% (+21.6)#1,765
88. Bradgate 31.6% 14.9% (+16.7)#88 10.0% (+21.6)#1,773
89. Beacon 31.5% 14.9% (+16.6)#89 10.0% (+21.5)#1,795
90. Hartwick 31.4% 14.9% (+16.5)#90 10.0% (+21.4)#1,809
91. Fontanelle 31.3% 14.9% (+16.4)#91 10.0% (+21.3)#1,830
92. Scarville 31.2% 14.9% (+16.4)#92 10.0% (+21.3)#1,837
93. Thompson 31.2% 14.9% (+16.4)#93 10.0% (+21.2)#1,839
94. Middletown 31.1% 14.9% (+16.3)#94 10.0% (+21.1)#1,855
95. Bennett 31.0% 14.9% (+16.2)#95 10.0% (+21.0)#1,871
96. Schleswig 30.8% 14.9% (+15.9)#96 10.0% (+20.8)#1,906
97. Keomah Village 30.8% 14.9% (+15.9)#97 10.0% (+20.8)#1,913
98. Stockport 30.7% 14.9% (+15.8)#98 10.0% (+20.7)#1,939
99. Beaverdale 30.7% 14.9% (+15.8)#99 10.0% (+20.7)#1,942
100. Burr Oak 30.6% 14.9% (+15.8)#100 10.0% (+20.6)#1,954

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
83.3%
#4
79.2%
#5
78.2%
#6
73.3%
#7
61.5%
#8
57.1%
#9
53.8%
#10
53.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa?
Rochester has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Iowa is 14.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the United States is 10.0%.