Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Dakota

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Hansboro 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#112
2. Ypsilanti 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#2 13.7% (+86.3)#138
3. East Fairview 89.3% 11.8% (+77.5)#3 13.7% (+75.6)#184
4. East Dunseith 82.1% 11.8% (+70.3)#4 13.7% (+68.4)#244
5. Luverne 76.5% 11.8% (+64.6)#5 13.7% (+62.8)#301
6. Litchville 69.2% 11.8% (+57.4)#6 13.7% (+55.5)#429
7. Springbrook 64.7% 11.8% (+52.9)#7 13.7% (+51.0)#525
8. Loma 61.5% 11.8% (+49.7)#8 13.7% (+47.8)#626
9. Solen 58.3% 11.8% (+46.5)#9 13.7% (+44.6)#723
10. Edmore 56.3% 11.8% (+44.5)#10 13.7% (+42.6)#802
11. Four Bears Village 56.0% 11.8% (+44.2)#11 13.7% (+42.3)#818
12. Bathgate 56.0% 11.8% (+44.2)#12 13.7% (+42.3)#819
13. Maxbass 55.6% 11.8% (+43.7)#13 13.7% (+41.9)#829
14. Ambrose 55.6% 11.8% (+43.7)#14 13.7% (+41.9)#835
15. Ruthville 54.5% 11.8% (+42.7)#15 13.7% (+40.8)#881
16. Cannon Ball 54.0% 11.8% (+42.2)#16 13.7% (+40.3)#907
17. Mandaree 50.9% 11.8% (+39.1)#17 13.7% (+37.2)#1,104
18. De Lamere 50.0% 11.8% (+38.2)#18 13.7% (+36.3)#1,181
19. Mylo 50.0% 11.8% (+38.2)#19 13.7% (+36.3)#1,189
20. Pillsbury 50.0% 11.8% (+38.2)#20 13.7% (+36.3)#1,191
21. Esmond 47.7% 11.8% (+35.9)#21 13.7% (+34.0)#1,337
22. Hampden 46.2% 11.8% (+34.3)#22 13.7% (+32.5)#1,439
23. Maddock 44.8% 11.8% (+33.0)#23 13.7% (+31.1)#1,560
24. Ryder 40.5% 11.8% (+28.7)#24 13.7% (+26.8)#2,043
25. Egeland 40.0% 11.8% (+28.2)#25 13.7% (+26.3)#2,110
26. Sarles 40.0% 11.8% (+28.2)#26 13.7% (+26.3)#2,120
27. Fairdale 40.0% 11.8% (+28.2)#27 13.7% (+26.3)#2,121
28. Souris 38.5% 11.8% (+26.6)#28 13.7% (+24.8)#2,302
29. Bowdon 37.9% 11.8% (+26.0)#29 13.7% (+24.2)#2,389
30. Fort Totten 36.2% 11.8% (+24.4)#30 13.7% (+22.6)#2,668
31. Warwick 34.2% 11.8% (+22.4)#31 13.7% (+20.5)#3,115
32. Conway 33.3% 11.8% (+21.5)#32 13.7% (+19.6)#3,328
33. Leal 33.3% 11.8% (+21.5)#33 13.7% (+19.6)#3,329
34. Zeeland 32.4% 11.8% (+20.5)#34 13.7% (+18.7)#3,520
35. Hannaford 32.4% 11.8% (+20.5)#35 13.7% (+18.7)#3,522
36. Pisek 32.1% 11.8% (+20.2)#36 13.7% (+18.4)#3,593
37. Shell Valley 31.3% 11.8% (+19.5)#37 13.7% (+17.6)#3,760
38. Parshall 30.1% 11.8% (+18.3)#38 13.7% (+16.4)#4,110
39. Kathryn 30.0% 11.8% (+18.2)#39 13.7% (+16.3)#4,150
40. Haynes 30.0% 11.8% (+18.2)#40 13.7% (+16.3)#4,155
41. Bisbee 29.6% 11.8% (+17.8)#41 13.7% (+15.9)#4,250
42. Noonan 29.2% 11.8% (+17.3)#42 13.7% (+15.5)#4,389
43. Anamoose 29.0% 11.8% (+17.1)#43 13.7% (+15.3)#4,454
44. Willow City 28.9% 11.8% (+17.1)#44 13.7% (+15.2)#4,470
45. Green Acres 28.7% 11.8% (+16.9)#45 13.7% (+15.0)#4,522
46. Fort Yates 28.6% 11.8% (+16.7)#46 13.7% (+14.9)#4,571
47. Erie 27.8% 11.8% (+16.0)#47 13.7% (+14.1)#4,860
48. Drake 27.4% 11.8% (+15.6)#48 13.7% (+13.7)#4,981
49. Almont 27.4% 11.8% (+15.6)#49 13.7% (+13.7)#4,991
50. Halliday 26.7% 11.8% (+14.9)#50 13.7% (+13.0)#5,251
51. Mooreton 26.4% 11.8% (+14.6)#51 13.7% (+12.7)#5,387
52. Center 26.0% 11.8% (+14.1)#52 13.7% (+12.3)#5,539
53. Reeder 25.6% 11.8% (+13.8)#53 13.7% (+11.9)#5,715
54. Antler 25.0% 11.8% (+13.2)#54 13.7% (+11.3)#5,990
55. Sheyenne 24.7% 11.8% (+12.9)#55 13.7% (+11.0)#6,094
56. Pettibone 24.1% 11.8% (+12.3)#56 13.7% (+10.4)#6,374
57. Hoople 24.0% 11.8% (+12.1)#57 13.7% (+10.3)#6,461
58. Carson 23.8% 11.8% (+12.0)#58 13.7% (+10.1)#6,525
59. Ashley 23.7% 11.8% (+11.8)#59 13.7% (+9.96)#6,613
60. Turtle Lake 23.6% 11.8% (+11.8)#60 13.7% (+9.90)#6,643
61. Verona 23.5% 11.8% (+11.7)#61 13.7% (+9.83)#6,678
62. Gardena 23.5% 11.8% (+11.7)#62 13.7% (+9.83)#6,684
63. Gackle 23.4% 11.8% (+11.6)#63 13.7% (+9.69)#6,757
64. Hazelton 23.1% 11.8% (+11.3)#64 13.7% (+9.38)#6,938
65. Amidon 23.1% 11.8% (+11.3)#65 13.7% (+9.38)#6,942
66. Makoti 22.9% 11.8% (+11.0)#66 13.7% (+9.16)#7,042
67. Driscoll 22.7% 11.8% (+10.9)#67 13.7% (+9.03)#7,119
68. Belcourt 22.5% 11.8% (+10.7)#68 13.7% (+8.82)#7,227
69. Scranton 22.3% 11.8% (+10.5)#69 13.7% (+8.59)#7,361
70. Devils Lake 22.2% 11.8% (+10.3)#70 13.7% (+8.47)#7,438
71. Hope 21.7% 11.8% (+9.86)#71 13.7% (+7.99)#7,683
72. Towner 21.6% 11.8% (+9.81)#72 13.7% (+7.94)#7,715
73. Upham 21.4% 11.8% (+9.60)#73 13.7% (+7.73)#7,831
74. Dawson 21.4% 11.8% (+9.60)#74 13.7% (+7.73)#7,836
75. Knox 21.4% 11.8% (+9.60)#75 13.7% (+7.73)#7,841
76. Adams 20.9% 11.8% (+9.07)#76 13.7% (+7.20)#8,163
77. Lisbon 20.7% 11.8% (+8.84)#77 13.7% (+6.97)#8,300
78. New Town 20.4% 11.8% (+8.60)#78 13.7% (+6.72)#8,466
79. Munich 20.3% 11.8% (+8.47)#79 13.7% (+6.60)#8,556
80. New Leipzig 20.0% 11.8% (+8.17)#80 13.7% (+6.30)#8,772
81. Montpelier 20.0% 11.8% (+8.17)#81 13.7% (+6.30)#8,781
82. Jud 20.0% 11.8% (+8.17)#82 13.7% (+6.30)#8,792
83. Rolla 19.8% 11.8% (+7.97)#83 13.7% (+6.10)#8,913
84. Lankin 19.6% 11.8% (+7.78)#84 13.7% (+5.91)#9,037
85. Selfridge 19.3% 11.8% (+7.43)#85 13.7% (+5.56)#9,295
86. Minto 18.8% 11.8% (+6.97)#86 13.7% (+5.10)#9,646
87. Wahpeton 18.6% 11.8% (+6.73)#87 13.7% (+4.86)#9,820
88. Fingal 18.5% 11.8% (+6.65)#88 13.7% (+4.78)#9,880
89. Valley City 18.5% 11.8% (+6.64)#89 13.7% (+4.77)#9,887
90. Columbus 18.4% 11.8% (+6.60)#90 13.7% (+4.72)#9,916
91. Fredonia 18.2% 11.8% (+6.36)#91 13.7% (+4.48)#10,099
92. Coleharbor 17.5% 11.8% (+5.67)#92 13.7% (+3.80)#10,572
93. Mott 17.5% 11.8% (+5.64)#93 13.7% (+3.77)#10,603
94. Grand Forks 17.4% 11.8% (+5.60)#94 13.7% (+3.72)#10,642
95. Fortuna 17.4% 11.8% (+5.57)#95 13.7% (+3.69)#10,671
96. Medina 17.4% 11.8% (+5.53)#96 13.7% (+3.66)#10,695
97. Hankinson 17.3% 11.8% (+5.50)#97 13.7% (+3.63)#10,712
98. Mchenry 17.2% 11.8% (+5.42)#98 13.7% (+3.54)#10,790
99. Stanton 17.1% 11.8% (+5.32)#99 13.7% (+3.44)#10,865
100. Tappen 17.1% 11.8% (+5.32)#100 13.7% (+3.44)#10,866

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
89.3%
#4
82.1%
#5
76.5%
#6
69.2%
#7
64.7%
#8
61.5%
#9
58.3%
#10
56.3%
What city has the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Dakota?
Hansboro has the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Females in North Dakota is 11.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.