Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Carolina

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Long Creek 100.0% 14.6% (+85.4)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#53
2. Ivanhoe 83.3% 14.6% (+68.7)#2 13.7% (+69.6)#231
3. Conetoe 73.2% 14.6% (+58.6)#3 13.7% (+59.5)#362
4. Shannon 65.5% 14.6% (+50.9)#4 13.7% (+51.8)#491
5. Bonnetsville 65.2% 14.6% (+50.6)#5 13.7% (+51.5)#501
6. Vann Crossroads 64.9% 14.6% (+50.3)#6 13.7% (+51.2)#512
7. Chowan Beach 64.8% 14.6% (+50.2)#7 13.7% (+51.1)#519
8. Brunswick 64.5% 14.6% (+49.9)#8 13.7% (+50.8)#534
9. Seven Springs 62.5% 14.6% (+47.9)#9 13.7% (+48.8)#593
10. Old Hundred 62.3% 14.6% (+47.7)#10 13.7% (+48.6)#602
11. Maury 58.5% 14.6% (+43.9)#11 13.7% (+44.8)#718
12. Silver City 58.0% 14.6% (+43.4)#12 13.7% (+44.3)#742
13. Fountain 56.2% 14.6% (+41.6)#13 13.7% (+42.5)#808
14. Hightsville 55.9% 14.6% (+41.3)#14 13.7% (+42.2)#820
15. Boone 55.5% 14.6% (+40.9)#15 13.7% (+41.8)#837
16. South Mills 54.8% 14.6% (+40.2)#16 13.7% (+41.1)#871
17. Mcfarlan 54.5% 14.6% (+40.0)#17 13.7% (+40.8)#882
18. South Weldon 53.0% 14.6% (+38.4)#18 13.7% (+39.3)#976
19. Engelhard 52.3% 14.6% (+37.7)#19 13.7% (+38.6)#1,018
20. Tabor City 52.0% 14.6% (+37.4)#20 13.7% (+38.3)#1,043
21. Clarkton 51.7% 14.6% (+37.1)#21 13.7% (+38.0)#1,066
22. Elizabethtown 51.5% 14.6% (+36.9)#22 13.7% (+37.8)#1,076
23. Robbinsville 50.6% 14.6% (+36.0)#23 13.7% (+36.9)#1,126
24. Cullowhee 49.9% 14.6% (+35.3)#24 13.7% (+36.2)#1,196
25. Garland 49.6% 14.6% (+35.0)#25 13.7% (+35.9)#1,211
26. Ramseur 49.5% 14.6% (+34.9)#26 13.7% (+35.8)#1,221
27. Buies Creek 49.2% 14.6% (+34.6)#27 13.7% (+35.5)#1,234
28. Biscoe 49.1% 14.6% (+34.5)#28 13.7% (+35.4)#1,245
29. Fairplains 48.4% 14.6% (+33.8)#29 13.7% (+34.7)#1,291
30. Belhaven 48.1% 14.6% (+33.5)#30 13.7% (+34.4)#1,317
31. Hoffman 47.1% 14.6% (+32.5)#31 13.7% (+33.4)#1,380
32. Falcon 46.6% 14.6% (+32.0)#32 13.7% (+32.9)#1,406
33. Dudley 46.1% 14.6% (+31.5)#33 13.7% (+32.4)#1,443
34. Raynham 45.5% 14.6% (+30.9)#34 13.7% (+31.8)#1,492
35. Edenton 45.4% 14.6% (+30.8)#35 13.7% (+31.7)#1,500
36. Mooresboro 45.2% 14.6% (+30.6)#36 13.7% (+31.5)#1,515
37. Scotland Neck 44.8% 14.6% (+30.2)#37 13.7% (+31.1)#1,554
38. Pembroke 43.8% 14.6% (+29.2)#38 13.7% (+30.1)#1,656
39. Light Oak 43.3% 14.6% (+28.7)#39 13.7% (+29.6)#1,708
40. Parmele 43.2% 14.6% (+28.6)#40 13.7% (+29.5)#1,714
41. Webster 42.5% 14.6% (+27.9)#41 13.7% (+28.8)#1,790
42. Snow Hill 42.4% 14.6% (+27.8)#42 13.7% (+28.7)#1,807
43. Forest City 42.3% 14.6% (+27.7)#43 13.7% (+28.6)#1,823
44. Norman 42.3% 14.6% (+27.7)#44 13.7% (+28.6)#1,828
45. Brogden 42.2% 14.6% (+27.6)#45 13.7% (+28.5)#1,834
46. Maxton 41.9% 14.6% (+27.3)#46 13.7% (+28.2)#1,879
47. Elrod 41.7% 14.6% (+27.2)#47 13.7% (+28.0)#1,893
48. Marshallberg 41.6% 14.6% (+27.0)#48 13.7% (+27.9)#1,909
49. Cerro Gordo 40.6% 14.6% (+26.0)#49 13.7% (+26.9)#2,026
50. Manns Harbor 40.6% 14.6% (+26.0)#50 13.7% (+26.9)#2,032
51. Barker Heights 40.0% 14.6% (+25.4)#51 13.7% (+26.3)#2,096
52. Gibson 40.0% 14.6% (+25.4)#52 13.7% (+26.3)#2,097
53. Bridgeton 39.2% 14.6% (+24.6)#53 13.7% (+25.5)#2,198
54. Sandyfield 39.1% 14.6% (+24.5)#54 13.7% (+25.4)#2,204
55. Magnolia 38.9% 14.6% (+24.3)#55 13.7% (+25.2)#2,226
56. East Rockingham 38.8% 14.6% (+24.2)#56 13.7% (+25.1)#2,240
57. Red Springs 38.8% 14.6% (+24.2)#57 13.7% (+25.1)#2,252
58. Sylva 38.6% 14.6% (+24.0)#58 13.7% (+24.9)#2,277
59. Roseboro 38.6% 14.6% (+24.0)#59 13.7% (+24.9)#2,279
60. Pinnacle 38.2% 14.6% (+23.6)#60 13.7% (+24.5)#2,343
61. Beulaville 38.0% 14.6% (+23.4)#61 13.7% (+24.3)#2,372
62. Dobbins Heights 37.9% 14.6% (+23.3)#62 13.7% (+24.2)#2,385
63. Benson 37.9% 14.6% (+23.3)#63 13.7% (+24.2)#2,391
64. Dover 37.8% 14.6% (+23.2)#64 13.7% (+24.1)#2,403
65. Laurel Hill 37.6% 14.6% (+23.0)#65 13.7% (+23.9)#2,421
66. Wilson S Mills 37.4% 14.6% (+22.8)#66 13.7% (+23.7)#2,464
67. Arrowhead Beach 37.2% 14.6% (+22.6)#67 13.7% (+23.5)#2,486
68. East Laurinburg 37.0% 14.6% (+22.4)#68 13.7% (+23.3)#2,529
69. South Henderson 36.7% 14.6% (+22.1)#69 13.7% (+23.0)#2,583
70. Fairmont 36.7% 14.6% (+22.1)#70 13.7% (+23.0)#2,593
71. Reidsville 36.6% 14.6% (+22.0)#71 13.7% (+22.9)#2,613
72. Murfreesboro 36.5% 14.6% (+21.9)#72 13.7% (+22.8)#2,627
73. Columbia 36.4% 14.6% (+21.9)#73 13.7% (+22.7)#2,631
74. Momeyer 36.3% 14.6% (+21.7)#74 13.7% (+22.6)#2,658
75. Littleton 36.2% 14.6% (+21.6)#75 13.7% (+22.5)#2,683
76. Laurinburg 36.1% 14.6% (+21.5)#76 13.7% (+22.4)#2,711
77. Harrellsville 36.0% 14.6% (+21.4)#77 13.7% (+22.3)#2,716
78. Lucama 35.8% 14.6% (+21.2)#78 13.7% (+22.1)#2,765
79. East Spencer 35.8% 14.6% (+21.2)#79 13.7% (+22.1)#2,775
80. Hayesville 35.8% 14.6% (+21.2)#80 13.7% (+22.1)#2,781
81. Ansonville 35.6% 14.6% (+21.0)#81 13.7% (+21.9)#2,823
82. Rennert 35.6% 14.6% (+21.0)#82 13.7% (+21.9)#2,826
83. Grifton 35.5% 14.6% (+20.9)#83 13.7% (+21.8)#2,846
84. Rich Square 35.4% 14.6% (+20.8)#84 13.7% (+21.7)#2,862
85. Williamston 35.2% 14.6% (+20.6)#85 13.7% (+21.5)#2,896
86. Saratoga 35.1% 14.6% (+20.5)#86 13.7% (+21.4)#2,911
87. Roxboro 35.1% 14.6% (+20.5)#87 13.7% (+21.4)#2,915
88. Andrews 34.8% 14.6% (+20.2)#88 13.7% (+21.1)#2,999
89. Fallston 34.6% 14.6% (+20.0)#89 13.7% (+20.9)#3,024
90. Rockingham 34.6% 14.6% (+20.0)#90 13.7% (+20.9)#3,029
91. Dana 34.4% 14.6% (+19.8)#91 13.7% (+20.7)#3,077
92. Mount Airy 34.4% 14.6% (+19.8)#92 13.7% (+20.7)#3,083
93. St Pauls 34.3% 14.6% (+19.7)#93 13.7% (+20.6)#3,087
94. Fremont 34.3% 14.6% (+19.7)#94 13.7% (+20.6)#3,089
95. Hookerton 34.3% 14.6% (+19.7)#95 13.7% (+20.6)#3,098
96. Middleburg 33.8% 14.6% (+19.2)#96 13.7% (+20.1)#3,183
97. Cherokee 33.6% 14.6% (+19.0)#97 13.7% (+19.9)#3,241
98. Chocowinity 33.3% 14.6% (+18.7)#98 13.7% (+19.6)#3,285
99. Wakulla 33.3% 14.6% (+18.7)#99 13.7% (+19.6)#3,307
100. Robbins 32.7% 14.6% (+18.1)#100 13.7% (+19.0)#3,438

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Carolina are:
#1
83.3%
#2
73.2%
#3
65.5%
#4
65.2%
#5
64.9%
#6
64.5%
#7
62.5%
#8
62.3%
#9
58.5%
#10
58.0%
What city has the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Carolina?
Ivanhoe has the Highest Female Poverty Level in North Carolina with 83.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Females in North Carolina is 14.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.