Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Indiana

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Millville 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#21
2. Pence 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#2 13.7% (+86.3)#27
3. Otisco 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#3 13.7% (+86.3)#40
4. Penntown 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#4 13.7% (+86.3)#56
5. Fredericksburg 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#5 13.7% (+86.3)#89
6. Burney 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#6 13.7% (+86.3)#100
7. Lawrenceport 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#7 13.7% (+86.3)#105
8. Lewis 96.7% 13.5% (+83.1)#8 13.7% (+83.0)#150
9. Linn Grove 87.5% 13.5% (+74.0)#9 13.7% (+73.8)#198
10. Notre Dame 86.7% 13.5% (+73.1)#10 13.7% (+73.0)#205
11. Centerton 78.8% 13.5% (+65.3)#11 13.7% (+65.1)#272
12. Adams 78.6% 13.5% (+65.1)#12 13.7% (+64.9)#276
13. Lake View 75.9% 13.5% (+62.3)#13 13.7% (+62.2)#316
14. New Marion 72.7% 13.5% (+59.2)#14 13.7% (+59.0)#378
15. Alamo 72.4% 13.5% (+58.9)#15 13.7% (+58.7)#385
16. Grayford 70.4% 13.5% (+56.8)#16 13.7% (+56.7)#405
17. Lamb 70.0% 13.5% (+56.5)#17 13.7% (+56.3)#410
18. North Grove 70.0% 13.5% (+56.5)#18 13.7% (+56.3)#415
19. Williams 69.6% 13.5% (+56.1)#19 13.7% (+55.9)#424
20. Green Hill 65.3% 13.5% (+51.8)#20 13.7% (+51.6)#499
21. Mauckport 64.9% 13.5% (+51.3)#21 13.7% (+51.2)#517
22. Eugene 63.9% 13.5% (+50.4)#22 13.7% (+50.2)#550
23. Lake Cicott 63.2% 13.5% (+49.6)#23 13.7% (+49.5)#571
24. Deer Creek 62.3% 13.5% (+48.8)#24 13.7% (+48.6)#599
25. Cates 62.2% 13.5% (+48.6)#25 13.7% (+48.5)#607
26. Kimmell 58.9% 13.5% (+45.3)#26 13.7% (+45.2)#707
27. Prairie Creek 58.5% 13.5% (+45.0)#27 13.7% (+44.8)#716
28. St Mary Of The Woods 58.3% 13.5% (+44.7)#28 13.7% (+44.6)#730
29. Hanna 58.2% 13.5% (+44.7)#29 13.7% (+44.5)#732
30. Hartz Lake 57.5% 13.5% (+44.0)#30 13.7% (+43.8)#753
31. Brimfield 53.8% 13.5% (+40.3)#31 13.7% (+40.1)#915
32. Malden 53.0% 13.5% (+39.5)#32 13.7% (+39.3)#973
33. English 52.9% 13.5% (+39.4)#33 13.7% (+39.2)#981
34. Forest 52.1% 13.5% (+38.6)#34 13.7% (+38.4)#1,028
35. Azalia 52.1% 13.5% (+38.5)#35 13.7% (+38.4)#1,036
36. Servia 52.0% 13.5% (+38.4)#36 13.7% (+38.3)#1,045
37. Nyona Lake 47.8% 13.5% (+34.2)#37 13.7% (+34.1)#1,332
38. Arthur 47.5% 13.5% (+34.0)#38 13.7% (+33.8)#1,351
39. Young America 47.4% 13.5% (+33.9)#39 13.7% (+33.7)#1,358
40. Cross Plains 46.9% 13.5% (+33.4)#40 13.7% (+33.2)#1,390
41. Billtown 46.5% 13.5% (+32.9)#41 13.7% (+32.8)#1,411
42. Bippus 45.8% 13.5% (+32.3)#42 13.7% (+32.1)#1,464
43. Fairbanks 45.0% 13.5% (+31.4)#43 13.7% (+31.3)#1,543
44. Butlerville 44.6% 13.5% (+31.0)#44 13.7% (+30.9)#1,581
45. Crandall 44.2% 13.5% (+30.7)#45 13.7% (+30.5)#1,617
46. Newberry 43.2% 13.5% (+29.7)#46 13.7% (+29.5)#1,713
47. Hobbs 42.1% 13.5% (+28.6)#47 13.7% (+28.4)#1,852
48. Laurel 41.8% 13.5% (+28.3)#48 13.7% (+28.1)#1,888
49. Hardinsburg 41.2% 13.5% (+27.6)#49 13.7% (+27.5)#1,954
50. Montmorenci 40.9% 13.5% (+27.4)#50 13.7% (+27.2)#1,979
51. Pleasantville 40.9% 13.5% (+27.4)#51 13.7% (+27.2)#1,984
52. Ambia 40.2% 13.5% (+26.6)#52 13.7% (+26.5)#2,077
53. Judson 40.0% 13.5% (+26.5)#53 13.7% (+26.3)#2,118
54. Amity 39.1% 13.5% (+25.6)#54 13.7% (+25.4)#2,201
55. Thayer 39.0% 13.5% (+25.5)#55 13.7% (+25.3)#2,211
56. Redkey 38.9% 13.5% (+25.4)#56 13.7% (+25.2)#2,234
57. Coal 38.7% 13.5% (+25.2)#57 13.7% (+25.0)#2,260
58. Shelby 38.5% 13.5% (+24.9)#58 13.7% (+24.8)#2,299
59. Crane 38.4% 13.5% (+24.9)#59 13.7% (+24.7)#2,308
60. Merom 38.2% 13.5% (+24.6)#60 13.7% (+24.5)#2,341
61. Letts 38.1% 13.5% (+24.6)#61 13.7% (+24.4)#2,358
62. Boswell 38.0% 13.5% (+24.5)#62 13.7% (+24.3)#2,367
63. Spring Grove 37.5% 13.5% (+24.0)#63 13.7% (+23.8)#2,431
64. Bloomingdale 37.3% 13.5% (+23.8)#64 13.7% (+23.6)#2,467
65. Boston 37.2% 13.5% (+23.7)#65 13.7% (+23.5)#2,485
66. Knox 37.2% 13.5% (+23.6)#66 13.7% (+23.5)#2,500
67. Jasonville 36.7% 13.5% (+23.2)#67 13.7% (+23.0)#2,584
68. New Salisbury 36.4% 13.5% (+22.9)#68 13.7% (+22.7)#2,639
69. Laconia 35.7% 13.5% (+22.2)#69 13.7% (+22.0)#2,799
70. Williamsburg 35.5% 13.5% (+22.0)#70 13.7% (+21.8)#2,831
71. Eden 35.2% 13.5% (+21.7)#71 13.7% (+21.5)#2,905
72. West Lafayette 35.1% 13.5% (+21.6)#72 13.7% (+21.4)#2,921
73. Alford 35.0% 13.5% (+21.4)#73 13.7% (+21.3)#2,952
74. Cannelton 34.8% 13.5% (+21.3)#74 13.7% (+21.1)#2,978
75. Scottsburg 34.7% 13.5% (+21.2)#75 13.7% (+21.0)#3,005
76. Russellville 34.6% 13.5% (+21.1)#76 13.7% (+20.9)#3,035
77. Staunton 34.1% 13.5% (+20.6)#77 13.7% (+20.4)#3,126
78. Gary 34.1% 13.5% (+20.6)#78 13.7% (+20.4)#3,135
79. Owensburg 33.9% 13.5% (+20.4)#79 13.7% (+20.2)#3,163
80. Roachdale 33.3% 13.5% (+19.8)#80 13.7% (+19.6)#3,286
81. Mount Ayr 33.3% 13.5% (+19.8)#81 13.7% (+19.6)#3,311
82. Leiters Ford 33.1% 13.5% (+19.6)#82 13.7% (+19.4)#3,351
83. Paoli 32.7% 13.5% (+19.1)#83 13.7% (+19.0)#3,449
84. Rockville 32.4% 13.5% (+18.8)#84 13.7% (+18.7)#3,525
85. Kempton 32.1% 13.5% (+18.6)#85 13.7% (+18.4)#3,575
86. Libertyville 32.1% 13.5% (+18.6)#86 13.7% (+18.4)#3,576
87. Blairsville 32.0% 13.5% (+18.5)#87 13.7% (+18.3)#3,611
88. Poneto 31.9% 13.5% (+18.3)#88 13.7% (+18.2)#3,640
89. Muncie 31.8% 13.5% (+18.3)#89 13.7% (+18.1)#3,651
90. Campbellsburg 31.2% 13.5% (+17.6)#90 13.7% (+17.5)#3,809
91. Bloomington 31.1% 13.5% (+17.6)#91 13.7% (+17.4)#3,823
92. East Chicago 31.1% 13.5% (+17.5)#92 13.7% (+17.4)#3,840
93. Switz City 31.0% 13.5% (+17.5)#93 13.7% (+17.3)#3,851
94. Depauw 30.9% 13.5% (+17.4)#94 13.7% (+17.2)#3,879
95. Brooksburg 30.8% 13.5% (+17.2)#95 13.7% (+17.1)#3,916
96. Winamac 30.4% 13.5% (+16.9)#96 13.7% (+16.7)#4,031
97. Holiday Woods 30.0% 13.5% (+16.5)#97 13.7% (+16.3)#4,149
98. Culver 29.8% 13.5% (+16.2)#98 13.7% (+16.1)#4,218
99. Hudson 29.7% 13.5% (+16.2)#99 13.7% (+16.0)#4,225
100. Crows Nest 29.4% 13.5% (+15.9)#100 13.7% (+15.7)#4,307

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
86.7%
#3
72.4%
#4
69.6%
#5
64.9%
#6
58.9%
#7
58.3%
#8
58.2%
#9
52.9%
#10
44.6%
What city has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Indiana?
Fredericksburg has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Females in Indiana is 13.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.