Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Wisconsin

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Big Foot Prairie 91.2% 11.7% (+79.5)#1 13.7% (+77.5)#174
2. Paac Ciinak 58.8% 11.7% (+47.1)#2 13.7% (+45.1)#708
3. Ceex Haci 55.0% 11.7% (+43.3)#3 13.7% (+41.3)#861
4. Pembine 54.3% 11.7% (+42.6)#4 13.7% (+40.6)#899
5. Odanah 53.8% 11.7% (+42.1)#5 13.7% (+40.1)#917
6. Chelsea 53.7% 11.7% (+41.9)#6 13.7% (+40.0)#933
7. Middle Village 49.5% 11.7% (+37.7)#7 13.7% (+35.8)#1,222
8. Florence 49.3% 11.7% (+37.6)#8 13.7% (+35.6)#1,227
9. Zoar 47.5% 11.7% (+35.8)#9 13.7% (+33.8)#1,352
10. Houlton 45.6% 11.7% (+33.9)#10 13.7% (+31.9)#1,476
11. Radisson 43.6% 11.7% (+31.9)#11 13.7% (+29.9)#1,670
12. Sobieski 41.1% 11.7% (+29.4)#12 13.7% (+27.4)#1,964
13. Springbrook 40.5% 11.7% (+28.8)#13 13.7% (+26.8)#2,035
14. Amberg 40.0% 11.7% (+28.3)#14 13.7% (+26.3)#2,107
15. Soldiers Grove 39.1% 11.7% (+27.4)#15 13.7% (+25.4)#2,199
16. Marquette 39.1% 11.7% (+27.3)#16 13.7% (+25.4)#2,209
17. Minong 37.4% 11.7% (+25.7)#17 13.7% (+23.7)#2,452
18. Mole Lake 37.4% 11.7% (+25.7)#18 13.7% (+23.7)#2,457
19. Hancock 37.3% 11.7% (+25.6)#19 13.7% (+23.6)#2,471
20. Barronett 37.0% 11.7% (+25.2)#20 13.7% (+23.3)#2,530
21. Keshena 36.9% 11.7% (+25.2)#21 13.7% (+23.2)#2,538
22. Birch Hill 35.7% 11.7% (+24.0)#22 13.7% (+22.0)#2,792
23. Wabeno 35.6% 11.7% (+23.9)#23 13.7% (+21.9)#2,816
24. Lake Tomahawk 35.5% 11.7% (+23.8)#24 13.7% (+21.8)#2,839
25. Franks Field 35.5% 11.7% (+23.8)#25 13.7% (+21.8)#2,854
26. Elcho 35.2% 11.7% (+23.5)#26 13.7% (+21.5)#2,891
27. Norwalk 34.4% 11.7% (+22.7)#27 13.7% (+20.7)#3,061
28. Adams 34.2% 11.7% (+22.5)#28 13.7% (+20.5)#3,120
29. Markesan 33.0% 11.7% (+21.3)#29 13.7% (+19.3)#3,376
30. Mission 32.8% 11.7% (+21.1)#30 13.7% (+19.1)#3,420
31. Townsend 32.3% 11.7% (+20.5)#31 13.7% (+18.6)#3,541
32. Easton 32.1% 11.7% (+20.4)#32 13.7% (+18.4)#3,578
33. White Lake 32.1% 11.7% (+20.3)#33 13.7% (+18.4)#3,596
34. Jump River 31.7% 11.7% (+20.0)#34 13.7% (+18.0)#3,670
35. Wausaukee 31.4% 11.7% (+19.7)#35 13.7% (+17.7)#3,736
36. New Post 31.0% 11.7% (+19.3)#36 13.7% (+17.3)#3,850
37. Whitewater 30.7% 11.7% (+19.0)#37 13.7% (+17.0)#3,935
38. La Farge 30.5% 11.7% (+18.8)#38 13.7% (+16.8)#3,988
39. Pulcifer 30.3% 11.7% (+18.6)#39 13.7% (+16.6)#4,057
40. Little Round Lake 29.6% 11.7% (+17.9)#40 13.7% (+15.9)#4,259
41. Embarrass 29.5% 11.7% (+17.8)#41 13.7% (+15.8)#4,275
42. Park Falls 29.5% 11.7% (+17.7)#42 13.7% (+15.8)#4,295
43. Gratiot 29.2% 11.7% (+17.5)#43 13.7% (+15.5)#4,359
44. Aniwa 29.1% 11.7% (+17.4)#44 13.7% (+15.4)#4,407
45. Fairchild 29.0% 11.7% (+17.3)#45 13.7% (+15.3)#4,451
46. Siren 28.6% 11.7% (+16.9)#46 13.7% (+14.9)#4,544
47. Cumberland 28.6% 11.7% (+16.9)#47 13.7% (+14.9)#4,554
48. Woodman 28.6% 11.7% (+16.9)#48 13.7% (+14.9)#4,565
49. Sister Bay 28.2% 11.7% (+16.5)#49 13.7% (+14.5)#4,709
50. Drummond 28.0% 11.7% (+16.3)#50 13.7% (+14.3)#4,788
51. Camp Douglas 28.0% 11.7% (+16.3)#51 13.7% (+14.3)#4,798
52. Friendship 27.9% 11.7% (+16.2)#52 13.7% (+14.2)#4,807
53. Reserve 27.8% 11.7% (+16.1)#53 13.7% (+14.1)#4,836
54. Frederic 27.0% 11.7% (+15.3)#54 13.7% (+13.3)#5,138
55. Neshkoro 26.9% 11.7% (+15.2)#55 13.7% (+13.2)#5,152
56. Saxon 26.9% 11.7% (+15.2)#56 13.7% (+13.2)#5,164
57. Rewey 26.8% 11.7% (+15.1)#57 13.7% (+13.1)#5,224
58. Ashland 26.5% 11.7% (+14.8)#58 13.7% (+12.8)#5,331
59. Woodford 26.5% 11.7% (+14.8)#59 13.7% (+12.8)#5,349
60. Taylor 26.3% 11.7% (+14.6)#60 13.7% (+12.6)#5,400
61. Juda 26.1% 11.7% (+14.3)#61 13.7% (+12.4)#5,497
62. Avoca 25.9% 11.7% (+14.2)#62 13.7% (+12.2)#5,578
63. Oxford 25.9% 11.7% (+14.2)#63 13.7% (+12.2)#5,579
64. Cobb 25.7% 11.7% (+14.0)#64 13.7% (+12.0)#5,632
65. New Odanah 25.4% 11.7% (+13.7)#65 13.7% (+11.7)#5,781
66. Phillips 25.4% 11.7% (+13.7)#66 13.7% (+11.7)#5,799
67. Kennan 25.0% 11.7% (+13.3)#67 13.7% (+11.3)#5,953
68. Milwaukee 25.0% 11.7% (+13.3)#68 13.7% (+11.3)#5,997
69. Sand Pillow 24.8% 11.7% (+13.1)#69 13.7% (+11.1)#6,053
70. Boulder Junction 24.7% 11.7% (+13.0)#70 13.7% (+11.0)#6,109
71. Endeavor 24.4% 11.7% (+12.7)#71 13.7% (+10.7)#6,231
72. Dalton 24.2% 11.7% (+12.4)#72 13.7% (+10.5)#6,357
73. Waterloo 24.2% 11.7% (+12.4)#73 13.7% (+10.5)#6,359
74. Grand View 24.1% 11.7% (+12.4)#74 13.7% (+10.4)#6,372
75. Bancroft 23.6% 11.7% (+11.9)#75 13.7% (+9.91)#6,638
76. Richland Center 23.3% 11.7% (+11.6)#76 13.7% (+9.63)#6,788
77. Ironton 23.1% 11.7% (+11.4)#77 13.7% (+9.43)#6,900
78. Cassville 23.0% 11.7% (+11.3)#78 13.7% (+9.34)#6,959
79. Boaz 23.0% 11.7% (+11.2)#79 13.7% (+9.25)#7,004
80. Hayward 22.9% 11.7% (+11.2)#80 13.7% (+9.21)#7,016
81. Minocqua 22.9% 11.7% (+11.1)#81 13.7% (+9.16)#7,036
82. Edmund 22.8% 11.7% (+11.1)#82 13.7% (+9.09)#7,077
83. Chetek 22.8% 11.7% (+11.1)#83 13.7% (+9.07)#7,085
84. Abbotsford 22.7% 11.7% (+11.0)#84 13.7% (+9.03)#7,106
85. Cable 22.7% 11.7% (+11.0)#85 13.7% (+9.03)#7,112
86. Platteville 22.6% 11.7% (+10.9)#86 13.7% (+8.95)#7,160
87. Newald 22.6% 11.7% (+10.9)#87 13.7% (+8.88)#7,195
88. Eland 22.5% 11.7% (+10.8)#88 13.7% (+8.78)#7,246
89. Granton 22.5% 11.7% (+10.8)#89 13.7% (+8.77)#7,251
90. Wautoma 22.5% 11.7% (+10.7)#90 13.7% (+8.75)#7,265
91. Hurley 22.4% 11.7% (+10.7)#91 13.7% (+8.70)#7,299
92. Abrams 22.4% 11.7% (+10.7)#92 13.7% (+8.67)#7,314
93. Laona 22.4% 11.7% (+10.6)#93 13.7% (+8.67)#7,318
94. Marion 22.4% 11.7% (+10.6)#94 13.7% (+8.65)#7,325
95. La Crosse 22.4% 11.7% (+10.6)#95 13.7% (+8.65)#7,327
96. Bagley 22.3% 11.7% (+10.6)#96 13.7% (+8.65)#7,330
97. Readstown 22.3% 11.7% (+10.6)#97 13.7% (+8.61)#7,347
98. Nichols 22.1% 11.7% (+10.4)#98 13.7% (+8.42)#7,466
99. Iron River 22.0% 11.7% (+10.3)#99 13.7% (+8.30)#7,528
100. Elmwood 21.9% 11.7% (+10.2)#100 13.7% (+8.18)#7,584

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Wisconsin are:
#1
54.3%
#2
53.8%
#3
53.7%
#4
49.5%
#5
49.3%
#6
47.5%
#7
45.6%
#8
43.6%
#9
41.1%
#10
40.5%
What city has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Wisconsin?
Pembine has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Wisconsin with 54.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the State of Wisconsin?
Poverty Level Among Females in Wisconsin is 11.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.