Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Oklahoma

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Shamrock 100.0% 16.5% (+83.5)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#85
2. Cooperton 100.0% 16.5% (+83.5)#2 13.7% (+86.3)#143
3. Bee 93.4% 16.5% (+76.9)#3 13.7% (+79.7)#163
4. Mulberry 88.5% 16.5% (+72.0)#4 13.7% (+74.8)#191
5. Badger Lee 80.0% 16.5% (+63.5)#5 13.7% (+66.3)#262
6. Emet 77.8% 16.5% (+61.3)#6 13.7% (+64.1)#286
7. Grand Lake Towne 75.7% 16.5% (+59.2)#7 13.7% (+62.0)#320
8. Amorita 75.0% 16.5% (+58.5)#8 13.7% (+61.3)#337
9. Piney 73.9% 16.5% (+57.4)#9 13.7% (+60.2)#348
10. Deer Lick 73.2% 16.5% (+56.7)#10 13.7% (+59.5)#367
11. Oak Hill-Piney 67.1% 16.5% (+50.6)#11 13.7% (+53.4)#459
12. Rosston 66.7% 16.5% (+50.2)#12 13.7% (+53.0)#471
13. Avard 66.7% 16.5% (+50.2)#13 13.7% (+53.0)#475
14. Platter 65.2% 16.5% (+48.7)#14 13.7% (+51.5)#502
15. Butler 62.9% 16.5% (+46.4)#15 13.7% (+49.2)#578
16. Bell 61.8% 16.5% (+45.3)#16 13.7% (+48.1)#615
17. Tenkiller 61.5% 16.5% (+45.0)#17 13.7% (+47.8)#623
18. Monroe 60.0% 16.5% (+43.5)#18 13.7% (+46.3)#663
19. Atwood 59.5% 16.5% (+43.0)#19 13.7% (+45.8)#686
20. Dustin 58.7% 16.5% (+42.2)#20 13.7% (+45.0)#711
21. Mccurtain 58.3% 16.5% (+41.8)#21 13.7% (+44.6)#728
22. Slick 57.4% 16.5% (+40.9)#22 13.7% (+43.7)#755
23. Elm Grove 57.3% 16.5% (+40.8)#23 13.7% (+43.6)#758
24. Dripping Springs 57.1% 16.5% (+40.6)#24 13.7% (+43.4)#770
25. Hoyt 55.8% 16.5% (+39.3)#25 13.7% (+42.1)#824
26. Ratliff City 54.5% 16.5% (+38.0)#26 13.7% (+40.8)#883
27. May 54.5% 16.5% (+38.0)#27 13.7% (+40.8)#890
28. Bunch 54.5% 16.5% (+38.0)#28 13.7% (+40.8)#891
29. White Water 53.8% 16.5% (+37.3)#29 13.7% (+40.1)#920
30. Bowring 53.7% 16.5% (+37.2)#30 13.7% (+40.0)#927
31. Hanna 53.2% 16.5% (+36.7)#31 13.7% (+39.5)#966
32. Baker 52.5% 16.5% (+36.0)#32 13.7% (+38.8)#1,004
33. Langston 51.3% 16.5% (+34.8)#33 13.7% (+37.6)#1,084
34. Summit 51.0% 16.5% (+34.5)#34 13.7% (+37.3)#1,103
35. Martha 50.8% 16.5% (+34.3)#35 13.7% (+37.1)#1,113
36. Boynton 50.6% 16.5% (+34.1)#36 13.7% (+36.9)#1,124
37. Boswell 50.6% 16.5% (+34.1)#37 13.7% (+36.9)#1,127
38. Moyers 50.0% 16.5% (+33.5)#38 13.7% (+36.3)#1,163
39. Whippoorwill 50.0% 16.5% (+33.5)#39 13.7% (+36.3)#1,174
40. Douglas 50.0% 16.5% (+33.5)#40 13.7% (+36.3)#1,177
41. Friendship 50.0% 16.5% (+33.5)#41 13.7% (+36.3)#1,186
42. Whitesboro 49.3% 16.5% (+32.8)#42 13.7% (+35.6)#1,226
43. Bennington 48.4% 16.5% (+31.9)#43 13.7% (+34.7)#1,289
44. Fitzhugh 47.7% 16.5% (+31.2)#44 13.7% (+34.0)#1,336
45. Billings 47.7% 16.5% (+31.2)#45 13.7% (+34.0)#1,341
46. Elohim 47.6% 16.5% (+31.1)#46 13.7% (+33.9)#1,345
47. Lawrence Creek 46.4% 16.5% (+29.9)#47 13.7% (+32.7)#1,416
48. Loyal 46.2% 16.5% (+29.7)#48 13.7% (+32.5)#1,436
49. Reydon 45.0% 16.5% (+28.5)#49 13.7% (+31.3)#1,536
50. Cedar Crest 44.7% 16.5% (+28.2)#50 13.7% (+31.0)#1,567
51. Rosedale 44.4% 16.5% (+27.9)#51 13.7% (+30.7)#1,597
52. Wapanucka 44.4% 16.5% (+27.9)#52 13.7% (+30.7)#1,602
53. White Eagle 44.2% 16.5% (+27.7)#53 13.7% (+30.5)#1,621
54. Mutual 43.5% 16.5% (+27.0)#54 13.7% (+29.8)#1,692
55. Hitchita 43.3% 16.5% (+26.8)#55 13.7% (+29.6)#1,704
56. Lima 42.9% 16.5% (+26.4)#56 13.7% (+29.2)#1,762
57. Little Rock 42.4% 16.5% (+25.9)#57 13.7% (+28.7)#1,803
58. Spavinaw 41.8% 16.5% (+25.3)#58 13.7% (+28.1)#1,885
59. Indianola 41.6% 16.5% (+25.1)#59 13.7% (+27.9)#1,918
60. Porum 40.6% 16.5% (+24.1)#60 13.7% (+26.9)#2,024
61. Yeager 40.6% 16.5% (+24.1)#61 13.7% (+26.9)#2,030
62. Carlisle 40.0% 16.5% (+23.5)#62 13.7% (+26.3)#2,098
63. Bluejacket 40.0% 16.5% (+23.5)#63 13.7% (+26.3)#2,101
64. Hendrix 40.0% 16.5% (+23.5)#64 13.7% (+26.3)#2,115
65. Lamont 39.8% 16.5% (+23.3)#65 13.7% (+26.1)#2,142
66. Heavener 39.6% 16.5% (+23.1)#66 13.7% (+25.9)#2,152
67. Wetumka 39.4% 16.5% (+22.9)#67 13.7% (+25.7)#2,168
68. Carmen 39.3% 16.5% (+22.8)#68 13.7% (+25.6)#2,183
69. Lowrey 39.3% 16.5% (+22.8)#69 13.7% (+25.6)#2,186
70. Yale 39.2% 16.5% (+22.7)#70 13.7% (+25.5)#2,192
71. Okemah 38.9% 16.5% (+22.4)#71 13.7% (+25.2)#2,224
72. Mcbride 38.8% 16.5% (+22.3)#72 13.7% (+25.1)#2,249
73. Tishomingo 38.6% 16.5% (+22.1)#73 13.7% (+24.9)#2,273
74. Wainwright 38.6% 16.5% (+22.1)#74 13.7% (+24.9)#2,281
75. Hugo 38.4% 16.5% (+21.9)#75 13.7% (+24.7)#2,307
76. Cottonwood 38.1% 16.5% (+21.6)#76 13.7% (+24.4)#2,357
77. Gans 38.0% 16.5% (+21.5)#77 13.7% (+24.3)#2,377
78. Depew 37.9% 16.5% (+21.4)#78 13.7% (+24.2)#2,386
79. Panama 37.8% 16.5% (+21.3)#79 13.7% (+24.1)#2,393
80. Tushka 37.8% 16.5% (+21.3)#80 13.7% (+24.1)#2,398
81. Simms 37.8% 16.5% (+21.3)#81 13.7% (+24.1)#2,406
82. Pensacola 37.7% 16.5% (+21.2)#82 13.7% (+24.0)#2,407
83. Salina 37.7% 16.5% (+21.2)#83 13.7% (+24.0)#2,413
84. Cowlington 37.5% 16.5% (+21.0)#84 13.7% (+23.8)#2,440
85. Hobart 37.5% 16.5% (+21.0)#85 13.7% (+23.8)#2,445
86. Sallisaw 37.4% 16.5% (+20.9)#86 13.7% (+23.7)#2,456
87. Blue 37.3% 16.5% (+20.8)#87 13.7% (+23.6)#2,482
88. Cameron 37.2% 16.5% (+20.7)#88 13.7% (+23.5)#2,498
89. Eakly 37.0% 16.5% (+20.5)#89 13.7% (+23.3)#2,521
90. Olive 37.0% 16.5% (+20.5)#90 13.7% (+23.3)#2,531
91. Lovell 36.8% 16.5% (+20.3)#91 13.7% (+23.1)#2,556
92. Eldorado 36.8% 16.5% (+20.3)#92 13.7% (+23.1)#2,561
93. Waurika 36.6% 16.5% (+20.1)#93 13.7% (+22.9)#2,608
94. Warwick 36.4% 16.5% (+19.9)#94 13.7% (+22.7)#2,646
95. Quinton 36.1% 16.5% (+19.6)#95 13.7% (+22.4)#2,702
96. Eufaula 36.0% 16.5% (+19.5)#96 13.7% (+22.3)#2,731
97. Lebanon 35.9% 16.5% (+19.4)#97 13.7% (+22.2)#2,745
98. Caney Ridge 35.9% 16.5% (+19.4)#98 13.7% (+22.2)#2,752
99. Shady Point 35.8% 16.5% (+19.3)#99 13.7% (+22.1)#2,764
100. Dewey 35.6% 16.5% (+19.1)#100 13.7% (+21.9)#2,815

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
93.4%
#4
88.5%
#5
80.0%
#6
75.7%
#7
75.0%
#8
73.9%
#9
73.2%
#10
66.7%
What city has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Oklahoma?
Shamrock has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma is 16.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.