Lumbee Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Lumbee Married-Couple Family Poverty
8.3%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,019,006 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 8.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.12% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Dominican (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Central American Indian (8.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and Native/Alaskan (8.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Lumbee Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.041% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 81.5% | 43.5% |
Range | 81.5% | 41.9% |
Mean | 19.0% | 11.6% |
Median | 10.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.9% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.3% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 7.6% |
Correlation Details
Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,257,411 | 5.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,094,548 | 5.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 211,865 | 6.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 116,998 | 6.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 77,959 | 7.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 9,477 | 8.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 4.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 9,277 | 13.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 3,848 | 15.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 6,831 | 7.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 5,429 | 14.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 22.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 1.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 10.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 5.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 24.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 20.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 9.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 6.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 14.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 6.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 5.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 8.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.81% | 3,239 | 6.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 5.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 11.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 7.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 7.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 20.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 14.3% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 22.2% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 16.5% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 17.1% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 8.3% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 8.1% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 11.8% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 43.5% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 8.1% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 12.0% |