Tohono O'odham Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Tohono O'odham Married-Couple Family Poverty
11.2%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,693,710 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 11.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.31% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tohono O'odham influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Tohono O'odham simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 0.93%), Pima (11.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 5.6%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 14.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Tohono O'odham Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.034% | 5.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 71.6% |
| Range | 100.0% | 65.8% |
| Mean | 24.4% | 23.0% |
| Median | 5.8% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.6% | 21.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.8% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 33.1% | 18.2% |
Correlation Details
| Tohono O'odham Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 56,777,017 | 6.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 1,353,864 | 7.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 385,770 | 10.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 65,693 | 12.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 11,962 | 7.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 56,832 | 5.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 4,489 | 20.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 1,835 | 54.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 1,178 | 21.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 1,824 | 40.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 965 | 11.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 5,820 | 9.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 7,564 | 14.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.57% | 2,403 | 13.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 454 | 15.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.52% | 3,621 | 6.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.96% | 392 | 50.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.26% | 2,021 | 31.2% |
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.49% | 749 | 14.6% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.94% | 8,434 | 24.5% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.67% | 353 | 30.3% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.37% | 187 | 52.2% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 283 | 71.6% |